Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/21/2004 11:17:16 PM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: kattracks

P.J. Crowley foolishly decided to open his fat pie hole, now, he'd better make sure he has a good lawyer.


2 posted on 07/21/2004 11:21:24 PM PDT by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

A widely circulated document with highest security classification? I don't recall seeing it. This is getting strange. Hold on to your hats. Could be an interesting summer. And enjoyable.


3 posted on 07/21/2004 11:21:57 PM PDT by Rennes Templar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
If he means widely circulated before it was stolen, he is muddying the water, trying to obscure the fact that the stolen papers might have had handwritten notes on them which made them unique from the circulated docs.

If he means that the STOLEN docs were subsequently circulated, then this is a ham-handed Clinton sabotage of Kerry.

If it's the latter, here comes H'lahrri!
4 posted on 07/21/2004 11:23:21 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Do Chernobyl restaurants serve Curied chicken?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

curiouser and curiouser


8 posted on 07/21/2004 11:30:55 PM PDT by moodyskeptic (www.WinWithHumor.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

"This was a document that was very widely circulated," he added, without noting that the Millennium plot after-action review was considered so sensitive that it received the government's highest-coded security classification.


There was once a time when security classifications actually meant something. And (I'm told) you could get into really deep doo-doo if you showed stuff to people who weren't supposed to see it.


9 posted on 07/21/2004 11:31:59 PM PDT by Sapper26 (In Europe will it be called Celsius 488.3?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
This was a document that was very widely circulated,"

It is not the circulated finished document that Berger sought and probably succeeded in hiding. Somebody made some very embarrassing notes on one of the drafts IMHO.

11 posted on 07/21/2004 11:32:36 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

OK. Let me get it all straight. I learned a few things in the last six years:

1.) It is okay to lie under oath as long as you claim it is only about sex, even if it isn't, and

2.) It is okay to stuff your socks, pants and suit jacket with classified documents that are never supposed to be removed from the Archive as long as you can say that it was a sloppy inadvertent error and that the documents were not "really" classified for all intents and purposes anyway.


17 posted on 07/21/2004 11:38:20 PM PDT by Donna Lee Nardo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

One of the top secret documents stolen from the National Archives by former National Security Advisor Sandy Berger last fall had been "widely circulated," former National Security Council spokesman P.J. Crowley revealed on Wednesday.

From what Kerry said to Dan Rather on the Evening News was that he knew nothing about Berger and the documents. Nothing. Not a thing. Zilch. Funny how Clinton and his proteges said they knew about this stuff months ago. Here is Kerry on the Intelligence Committee and he knows nothing? No wonder he flip flops so much. He has no memory.


18 posted on 07/21/2004 11:40:01 PM PDT by taxesareforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

Spin, spin, spin, the Clinton War Room is back in business, I wonder where the headquarters is ? I'd love to be a fly on the wall.


19 posted on 07/21/2004 11:40:18 PM PDT by John Lenin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
"widely circulated"

Do they mean "widely circulated" like a take out menu from the local Chinese restaurant?

Can we expect to see it under our windshield wipers after a vist to the mall?

22 posted on 07/21/2004 11:43:47 PM PDT by csvset
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks; All
Crosslinked:
Yes, Down My Pants. Oh, Like You Haven't? The Sordid Sandburglar Story

24 posted on 07/21/2004 11:44:15 PM PDT by backhoe (-30-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks; conspiratoristo; dubyaismypresident; Pontiac; Commiewatcher; GOP_Lady; boxerblues; ...
Does anyone think that Hildabeast is somehow connected with this?


31 posted on 07/22/2004 12:14:05 AM PDT by Las Vegas Dave ("Let's roll" in 2004 ----- Vote GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

Now Clinton is making a JOKE of it because "everyone knows" how messy and disorganized HIS National Security Adviser has always been. Is that supposed to be a good receomendation for Berger's (and Clinton's) precious "legacy"? It would seem that all sorts of things could get lost on his desk while he was advising the President on OUR security. An absent minded professor type?
Very scary folks.


32 posted on 07/22/2004 12:28:40 AM PDT by tinamina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

"This was a document that was very widely circulated".....


To me this translates to a lot of self incriminatory annotations written in the margins by the Clinton crew.


37 posted on 07/22/2004 2:10:26 AM PDT by dennisw (Once is Happenstance. Twice is Coincidence. The third time is Enemy action. - Ian Fleming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

Seems like there are more loose cannons on the dem side of late.


39 posted on 07/22/2004 3:40:29 AM PDT by Rebelbase ( A majority of Europeans have lost the courage of their fathers and grandfathers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

If it was widely circulated, then why did sockburgler need to steal it?


45 posted on 07/22/2004 5:28:06 AM PDT by zook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Where to I go to buy stock in Kool-Aid?

DemocRATs and media types are drinking it by the gallon!

Compared to the impeachment, this is a massive ingestion!

WOW!

47 posted on 07/22/2004 5:36:14 AM PDT by N. Theknow (Kennedy family legacy - can't skipper a boat, can't fly, can't drive, can't ski)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
This statement is totally meaningless and, I believe, intended to provide cover for what Sandy Berger was really doing - that is looking at the marked up DRAFT copies of the report. The one referred to in the article is very very unlikely to be any of the draft versions. I would be the final version and wide circulation (tens of people not hundreds) would not be unusual.

The draft copies on the other hand would not be circulated and the changes from the original to the final would tell volumes about the political pressure from Clinton and Berger to tone down the Clarke critique of the Administrations poor preparations against a terrorist attack. I would love to see that first Clarke draft. This is what they are attempting to cover up or discredit if it comes out.

49 posted on 07/22/2004 7:10:50 AM PDT by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

later


51 posted on 07/22/2004 7:49:29 AM PDT by chiller (Kill lying liberal Old media.....turn 'em off !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Crowley is obfuscating

Although various drafts of the document may have been widely circulated, the comments that it generated would have stayed with each individual copy only come back to the source.

It is the comments that I believe Berger was sanitizing out of all the drafts.

So Crowley's claim that everything was known by many is PURE BUNKUM

I suspect that there were comments made thast clinton did not want the 9/11 commission to see and he made Berger go retrieve them.

Crowley claims the 9/11 commision got to see all the docs but that was only AFTER Berger had destryed some and removed the notes from others.

52 posted on 07/22/2004 9:03:16 AM PDT by Wil H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson