Dr. James Shapiro is shown to be correct once more.
1 posted on
07/21/2004 8:50:00 PM PDT by
AndrewC
To: LiteKeeper; Michael_Michaelangelo; bondserv; Elsie; Aquinasfan; MacDorcha
2 posted on
07/21/2004 8:53:57 PM PDT by
AndrewC
(I am a Bertrand Russell agnostic, even an atheist.</sarcasm>)
To: AndrewC
Not that I doubt you, but does this somehow disprove evolution, other than to clarify a mechanism?
3 posted on
07/21/2004 8:54:36 PM PDT by
js1138
(In a minute there is time, for decisions and revisions which a minute will reverse. J Forbes Kerry)
To: AndrewC
But the real question is where did DNA come from?
7 posted on
07/21/2004 9:04:22 PM PDT by
rottndog
(WOOF!)
To: AndrewC
" transposons can cause favourable changes for the adaptation and survival of the organism. "Amazing. Who thought that up?
9 posted on
07/21/2004 9:06:32 PM PDT by
bayourod
(Kerry, the human downer, knows the words to "optimism" but can't quite get the tune right.)
To: AndrewC
The participants in the research project are Marta Puig, from the Department of Genetics and Microbiology from the UAB
I remember this name from my thesis research, though I was working with a Drosophila neural cell adhesion molecule.
12 posted on
07/21/2004 10:33:44 PM PDT by
aruanan
To: PatrickHenry
16 posted on
07/22/2004 9:18:57 AM PDT by
js1138
(In a minute there is time, for decisions and revisions which a minute will reverse. J Forbes Kerry)
To: AndrewC
theory of evolution is teleological and poor science
22 posted on
07/22/2004 1:27:38 PM PDT by
y2k_free_radical
(ESSE QUAM VIDERA-to be rather than to seem)
To: AndrewC
23 posted on
07/22/2004 11:06:44 PM PDT by
LiteKeeper
(Secularization of America)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson