Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Archive Employees Suspicious of Berger - They Were Watching Him
Drudge Report ^ | 7-21-04 | Drudge Report

Posted on 07/21/2004 7:59:22 PM PDT by Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh

Archives Employees Suspicious of Berger... devised a coding system and marked the documents they knew Berger was interested in canvassing, and watched him carefully... employees determined that that draft and all four or five other versions of the millennium memo had disappeared from the files after Berger viewed them, WASH POST set to report, say sources... Developing...


TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS: 911; bergerjail; jfk; johnkerry; kerry; kerryedwards; knowingly; maliously; nara; nationalarchives; nationalsecurity; oopsifilledmypants; sandyberger; sandyburglar; sockgate; socks; soxgate; stuffedpants; terrorism; theinadvertantthief; trousergate; willfully
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460461-466 next last
To: VRWCTexan

Kerry is a fool. This was orchestrated by Clinton who still thinks he's president. Should be pretty funny when Clinton and other RATS dump Berger overboard. Maybe Berget will claim insanity.


421 posted on 07/22/2004 10:49:18 PM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981

TerAYsa's probably already started writing big, fat checks to cover Kerry's botoxed bottom.


422 posted on 07/22/2004 10:52:10 PM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh

Berger may have been working for Kerry, but his real boss is still Clinton.


423 posted on 07/22/2004 10:53:17 PM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

How true. Gore did make funny noises. And now Kerry has center stage, only nobody's paying any attention. He'll have to start gurgling soon. In fact all the RATS and their flunkies will gurgle in unison, a la 'gravitas'.


424 posted on 07/22/2004 10:59:11 PM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: mass55th

Kerry's probably figured out by now that thanks to Clinton, he has about as much chance of being pres. as Howdy Doody.


425 posted on 07/22/2004 11:14:51 PM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

I didn't see the interview, but he has to be terrified that Clinton and the rest of RATs will either dump him off the back of the bus or engineer a tragic 'accident'. Or maybe we'll discover that Berger has a brain tumor that made him do it.


426 posted on 07/22/2004 11:30:35 PM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288

Didn't Karl Rove say recently that two or three big things were going to happen before Nov.? Maybe this is one of them.


427 posted on 07/22/2004 11:39:52 PM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies]

To: Southack

Berger clearly believed he wasn't being videotaped.


428 posted on 07/22/2004 11:45:24 PM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 334 | View Replies]

To: Dolphy
"Yes, but does that mean there weren't copies made when these drafts were archived?"

As other Freepers have noted, a copy with original notes is original information. The real question is whether the information Berger destroyed is retrievable. So really a key issue is whether the handwritten notes were backed-up, or whether any have been irretrievably lost when Berger destroyed the documents he stole.

My guess is that the handwritten notes were not backed-up and some were likely lost irretrievably. I base this on the following points:

1. Visually you can see whether you are looking at a note written by hand with a pen versus a copy of the same. If Berger could see that the handwritten notes he was reading were xeroxed, there would have been little point in taking them. On the other hand, if he could see that the marginal notes were in blue ink and had scored the paper, he knew he was holding the original.

2. Generally speaking, archives aren't about making copies, they are about keeping originals, (or in this case copies of drafts which were originals by virtue of the original handwritten annotations. So if an archive got a document that had handwriting in the margins, they would catalog it but would not make copies. Remember there's thousands of pages involved, and the archivist didn't know ahead of time what Berger was after. They can't make copies of all that stuff. Archives never have enough space, and they certainly don't have departments or procedures in place to make precautionary copies for routine document review requests.

3. For the archives to have copied beforehand the documents given to Berger would have been no small task. You don't just walk over to the xerox machine and make a copy of a top-secret document. So had the original hand-written notes been copied there would have been a cumbersome procedure to go through. There's no indication that could have happened when Berger requested docs from the archivist, especially on his first visit. They had more chance to hand him dups on his second visit, but even still given the paperwork undoubtedly involved in copying top-secret docs, I don't this happened.

4. Handwritten marginal notes would not be something normally duplicated. Normally the reviewer writes the notes and returns the document to the author, and waits for the next draft version. Not duplicating margin notes goes double for secret documents, which aren't allowed to be copied except under prescribed rules and procedures.

5. The Post is reporting that the Archives contacted Bruce Lindsey, a Clinton guy. That shows either that they were sympathetic to the liberal view, or that they considered it merely an administrative and not a criminal matter. In either event, this suggests the likelihood of them having backed-up any document given to Berger as less.

429 posted on 07/22/2004 11:46:15 PM PDT by dano1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 418 | View Replies]

To: NavySEAL F-16

Maybe North Caroline can outsource the governor's job to India, too.


430 posted on 07/22/2004 11:50:35 PM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 367 | View Replies]

To: eureka!

The archives room monitors who broke rules and left Berger alone for private phone calls, plus all those bathroom breaks....when they realized what Berger had been up to, had to be terrified about being fired. And thank God. They had enough sense to go to their boss and get the sting going.


431 posted on 07/22/2004 11:57:26 PM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 392 | View Replies]

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham; Alamo-Girl; Nita Nupress; GeronL; Mitchell; PhilDragoo; Dog; Dog Gone; ...
FYI......ping......Posts# 420,429,431,....

Never forget the 'INS'.....et al.

:-(

432 posted on 07/23/2004 4:05:42 AM PDT by maestro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 416 | View Replies]

To: maestro

Thanks for the ping!


433 posted on 07/23/2004 7:48:43 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 432 | View Replies]

To: dano1

Thank you for your comments on this and yes I know, the issue is if the handwritten notes were copied. I agree, the documents wouldn't have been copied at the time of his request but was curious about the whole archival procedure and the use of microfilm & microfiche.


434 posted on 07/23/2004 9:11:32 AM PDT by Dolphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 429 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign; hiredhand; LTCJ
Berger had sufficient clearances in order to have held his NSA position. It takes a LONG time, typically longer than a year, for the background investigations to be done.

He would have lost his "access" privileges when the 'Toon administration came to an end. That did not end his security clearance.

He was tasked on behalf of the 9/11 Commission to access this material for them, and that gave him the "right-to-know", and that possibly meant that his security clearance had to be "refreshed" somehow.

The documents were "marked" by the archivists when they suspected he might be switching documents.

Typically, there is no one in the room with you when you are "accessing" such materials. You are supposed to be able to be trusted to begin with, and the archivists almost NEVER have the "right-to-know" and therefore are not to be in that room with you.
435 posted on 07/23/2004 10:24:40 AM PDT by AFPhys ((.Praying for President Bush, our troops, their families, and all my American neighbors..))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 376 | View Replies]

To: MissAmericanPie

The draft documents almost certainly were NOT microfilmed.
.


436 posted on 07/23/2004 10:27:31 AM PDT by AFPhys ((.Praying for President Bush, our troops, their families, and all my American neighbors..))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 396 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy

Whether Clarke remembers what he wrote is beside the point.

Appparently, what is missing are some of the "working draft copies" of the same document Clarke authored that had been redlined by certain of the 'Toon cabinet members, and perhaps Berger and 'Toon himself.

What did they comment, redline, marginal note, etc... is the question --- might have been VERY INTERESTING TO THE 9/11 Commission --- and now lost forever. Comments not put into the final draft of the Millenium report could have been very revealing of the state of mind of the previous administration.

I, for one, would simply like to have it released NOW as to whose copies, and comments, are missing. I do not ask that they release the document, or what was said.

All I want to know now, is WHOSE COPIES DID BERGER DESTROY?
.


437 posted on 07/23/2004 10:35:35 AM PDT by AFPhys ((.Praying for President Bush, our troops, their families, and all my American neighbors..))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 400 | View Replies]

To: Dolphy

Short answer: NO


438 posted on 07/23/2004 10:40:31 AM PDT by AFPhys ((.Praying for President Bush, our troops, their families, and all my American neighbors..))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 418 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh

Hamburger on a toasted bun, anyone?


439 posted on 07/23/2004 10:42:54 AM PDT by Fitzcarraldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama

If I were Sandy, I'd be asking to be put in VERY protective custody. Problem is, with the Clinton's reach, it'd have to be in the Oval Office.


440 posted on 07/23/2004 10:45:16 AM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460461-466 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson