1 posted on
07/21/2004 9:26:35 AM PDT by
presidio9
TDIDDS
2 posted on
07/21/2004 9:27:47 AM PDT by
presidio9
(HAIL ANTS!!!)
To: presidio9
""I am for lower taxes and lower spending and lower deficits," Greenspan told the House Financial Services Committee in his second day of testimony on the Fed's midyear economic outlook."
Greenspan for President!
3 posted on
07/21/2004 9:37:21 AM PDT by
TexasGreg
("Democrats Piss Me Off")
To: presidio9; 4ConservativeJustices
Greenspan renewed his call for Congress to put back in place a budget mechanism that requires any new spending increases or tax cuts to be offset by spending reductions in other government programs or tax increases in other areas.My! What a concept!?? What a brilliant mind!? Wonder if that would work!?? /sarcasm
4 posted on
07/21/2004 9:40:02 AM PDT by
Ff--150
(John Birch Rocks!!!)
To: presidio9
Greenspan renewed his call for Congress to put back in place a budget mechanism that requires any new spending increases or tax cuts to be offset by spending reductions in other government programs or tax increases in other areas.Greenspan Calls for Responsible Federal Spending. Capitol Hill Outraged. Film at 11.
5 posted on
07/21/2004 9:46:16 AM PDT by
rudypoot
(Rat line = Routes that foreign fighters use to enter Iraq.)
To: presidio9
"I am for lower taxes and lower spending and lower deficits," Greenspan told the House Financial Services Committee When will the Dims decide he has to go???
6 posted on
07/21/2004 9:49:06 AM PDT by
trebb
(Ain't God good . . .)
To: presidio9
The Bush administration has supported such pay-as-you go procedures for government spending but not tax cuts. Which makes sense, because tax cuts mean economic growth, and that means more extortion money for the government even at a lower tax rate.
9 posted on
07/21/2004 10:51:18 AM PDT by
Moonman62
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson