1 posted on
07/20/2004 9:55:32 PM PDT by
hope
To: hope
2 posted on
07/20/2004 9:57:37 PM PDT by
counterpunch
(The CouNTeRPuNcH Collection - www.counterpunch.us)
To: hope
oh yeah - keep digging deeper into that hole you creeps - we want more headlines on this.
3 posted on
07/20/2004 9:59:01 PM PDT by
corkoman
(Logged in - have you?)
To: hope
He stole documents- who cares about where he stuffed them- he shouldn't have had them in his house.
4 posted on
07/20/2004 10:00:03 PM PDT by
piasa
(Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
To: hope
According to Davis, Berger is "a person of impeccable honesty and integrity." Just like the entirety of bill clinton's administration was the most ethical since before Adam.
5 posted on
07/20/2004 10:01:34 PM PDT by
GretchenM
(A country is a terrible thing to waste. Vote Republican.)
To: hope
If the socks don't fit you must aquit.
6 posted on
07/20/2004 10:02:25 PM PDT by
smoothsailing
(Eagles Up !!!!)
To: hope
Debka reports that it highly likely that a videotape of Bergers burglering is what is the basis for these specific claims of where he placed the stolen secrets.
To: hope
ROTF with glee!
Liars and Doc thieving pantloads are in trouble.IT'S THE COVER-UPS,STUPIDS!
Where oh where have the poor docs gone.
Oh where oh where can they be?
They're in Sandy's socks and in his pants,
And there are witnesses to his thieving spree.
To: hope
Reports CNN's Bob Franken: "Three law enforcement sources talking to CNN's Justice Department.."
Will make great witnesses for the prosecution.
To: hope
I sure hope all these Berger defenders have to eat their shorts over this sock stuffing denial.
18 posted on
07/20/2004 10:15:38 PM PDT by
umgud
(speaking strictly as an infidel,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,)
To: hope
Yes, he DID put docs in his socks, but he didn't know it, it was unintentional, a mistake, not relevant, a neo-con conspiracy, strangely timed accusations...
To: hope
I was disappointed in the fox all-stars. They were inept on this issue. Mort and Mara were just stupid and Charles lacked a bit.
To: hope
I've said it before in different ways and I'll say it again another way.
Bill Clinton + Sandy Berger investigation = arkancide
25 posted on
07/20/2004 10:34:22 PM PDT by
lewislynn
(Why do the same people who think "free trade" is the answer also want less foreign oil dependence?)
To: hope
"I did not have socks with those documents!"
To: hope
geez, sandy burglar's probably sitting in his basement bar with his hand wrapped around a bottle of jim beam wondering how his life turned out so stupid ... 30+ years of work all down the drain for a xxxlinton ... he must have felt really stupid shoving papers in his pants and socks trying to cover his and bill's and hillary's! tracks
bill's white shoe to the right
33 posted on
07/21/2004 6:22:06 AM PDT by
InvisibleChurch
(I actually did vote for the $87 billion before I voted against it)
To: hope
Former Clinton press secretary Joe Lockhart Is it just me, or does Joe Lockhart always look like he's got indigestion? He should do an endorsement deal with Maalox--I know the look on his face makes me want to reach for my bottle.....
To: hope
IOW Bergler is a common thief but would never stoop to stuffing top secret documents in his socks to steal them. And he is mightily offended at such baseless accusations!!!
39 posted on
07/21/2004 9:35:52 AM PDT by
dennisw
(Once is Happenstance. Twice is Coincidence. The third time is Enemy action. - Ian Fleming)
To: hope
Updated title should be "Dox in Socks"
42 posted on
07/21/2004 9:55:24 AM PDT by
baseballmom
(Michael Moore - An un-American Hatriot)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
