[BILL_C]

I would be devastated to think that my government lied to me about these things

---

I am working on an article which is exploding into a book (unfortunately) on one of the conspiracy "events."

I know absolutely for sure that our government is lying on one VERY important piece of history.

That made it easy for me to connect the dots. The Sandy Berger story just made the Clinton election lie fit.

One other post raised the question of WHY Bush doesn't go after Clinton. W may have been waiting for the right time, which may be now.

The democRATS have broached the rumor that Bin Laden is being held to be released around election time. They probably didn't know about Berger getting caught with his hands in the cookie jar. Hence Davis' comment today about political motivated timing.

Like the RATS haven't done worse, lots worse.

[ovrtaxt]

One other post raised the question of WHY Bush doesn't go after Clinton. W may have been waiting for the right time, which may be now.

Man, I hope you're right about that. I'm currently VERY disillusioned with the GOP and our left leaning leadership.

[livius]

This may be a little off-topic, but Spain has been having hearings regarding the March 11 terrorist attack. One thing that emerged is that ETA (native terrorist group) and the Muslims had stolen cars in the same town on the same day and were headed for the same place. Both were stopped by the police (for false license plates). The ETA members were arrested and their van was searched, revealing 1000 lbs of dynamite; the Moroccans were stopped but were only cited (for a counterfeit license plate!) and their van (which also contained hundreds of pounds of explosives) was not searched.

In the case of Spain, the domestic terrorists working with the Islamists were caught, but the foreign terrorists eventually succeeded and did the deed ; in the case of OKC, only the domestic terrorists with whom the Muslims were working were caught, or, for that matter, even searched for, probably thanks to the Clinton Rules.

[baseballmom]

One other post raised the question of WHY Bush doesn't go after Clinton.

I've thought about this a lot, and I know a lot of FReepers are really on GW's case about not going after Clinton. My personal view is that GWB is trying to protect the PRESIDENCY - not Bill Clinton - but the office of President of the United States. I understand, as I think it would be devastaing for the country, as well as world stability, to think that a president of the United States would cover up something of this magnitude.

For money? I don't think so, the presidency carries with it so many perks, and even the period after the presidency. Money rolls in. Look at the oodles of cash the Clinton and Hillary are raking in, via books, speeches, public appearances. I think it is all about the power. There is nothing like being the most powerful person in the world, is there. What a rush, as we used to say.

[oyez]

I would be devastated to think that my government lied to me about these things

That administration sponsored Federal terrorism at the siege of the Dravidian complex so why would they be concerned about lying about this?

[NotJustAnotherPrettyFace]

One other post raised the question of WHY Bush doesn't go after Clinton.

Ever read this book?