Skip to comments.
The EXPLANATION: Sandy Berger is covering up Bill Clinton’s GREATEST CRIME (2004)
Free Republic
| 7-2-0-04
| Bill Charleston
Posted on 07/20/2004 7:44:02 PM PDT by BILL_C
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 301 next last
To: BILL_C
Someday the whole truth about the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy conspiracy will come out.
Was Clinton spending terrorist money going after everyday American conservatives?
41
posted on
07/20/2004 8:42:55 PM PDT
by
GOPJ
To: BILL_C
I agree with you.
I was just wondering about what state you are from.
I'm from Pennsylvania. I know it's no big deal, I was just curious.
To: BILL_C
43
posted on
07/20/2004 8:44:03 PM PDT
by
Revolting cat!
("In the end, nothing explains anything!")
To: el_texicano
I'm willing to bet a steak dinner that Berger was in there lifting out Clinton's obvious foreign policy failures from the document stack. Leaving a paper trail that connected Bush 41 and Bush 43, as if nothing went wrong during the Clinton administration. It would fit the template of the left-winged kookburger conspiracy theory that Clinton was the "Greatest President of the late 20th Century" and the Bush's were/are complete failures.
44
posted on
07/20/2004 8:48:09 PM PDT
by
BigSkyFreeper
(While Bush plays "rope a dope", Kerry/Edwards play "grope a dope".)
To: Texas Eagle
This story may have been leaked by a RAT with the pre-meditated "it's a conspiracy" response ready for deployment. I think that's exactly what happened - a preemptive strike. Guess it backfired. Whoops....
45
posted on
07/20/2004 8:49:02 PM PDT
by
livius
To: ovrtaxt
Thanks for the PING...
BKMRK for later...
Looking for a previous thread at the moment...
Getting Late...Not Thinking Clearly!
46
posted on
07/20/2004 8:50:25 PM PDT
by
FlashBack
(Faith will not make our path easy, but it will give us strength for the Journey.)
To: expatpat
That's a very good point. What was their reason, I wonder? Any ideas, expatpat or any Freeper?
47
posted on
07/20/2004 8:51:35 PM PDT
by
livius
To: ovrtaxt
Oh yeah this is the real deal....but I have believed that since 1993 and the first WTC...once I read Bodansky and Mylroie I knew that we were in a wrold of hurt
48
posted on
07/20/2004 8:52:33 PM PDT
by
jnarcus
To: BILL_C
The only Justice Department official she mentions by name is Jamie Gorelick. Remarkable.
49
posted on
07/20/2004 8:54:02 PM PDT
by
livius
To: BILL_C
One term Sin-ator "The Shrew"
To: ovrtaxt
Thanks for that link. I've followed Jayna, starting on FR, and then heard her on local talk radio (Philly WPHT 1210) with Michael Smerconish. That day Michael was simulcasting from Senator Arlen Spector's office. There was a thread, I would have to go back and try to find it. She had on 2 counter terrorism experts who believed her story, re the FBI mess that ensued. He promised to look into it, considering the Burton investigation. I've called his office a few times to follow up. I don't think he is following up. Surprise!!
51
posted on
07/20/2004 8:54:06 PM PDT
by
baseballmom
(Michael Moore - An un-American Hatriot)
To: baseballmom
I would be devastated to think that my government lied to me about these things
I am working on an article which is exploding into a book (unfortunately) on one of the conspiracy "events."
I know absolutely for sure that our government is lying on one VERY important piece of history.
That made it easy for me to connect the dots. The Sandy Berger story just made the Clinton election lie fit.
One other post raised the question of WHY Bush doesn't go after Clinton. W may have been waiting for the right time, which may be now.
The democRATS have broached the rumor that Bin Laden is being held to be released around election time. They probably didn't know about Berger getting caught with his hands in the cookie jar. Hence Davis' comment today about political motivated timing.
Like the RATS haven't done worse, lots worse.
52
posted on
07/20/2004 8:55:06 PM PDT
by
BILL_C
To: baseballmom
Specter the backstabber deserves a trip to the unemployment office.
But Bush endorsed him! Go figure.
53
posted on
07/20/2004 8:56:23 PM PDT
by
ovrtaxt
(Palm Beach voters: It's not the heat, it's the stupidity.)
To: BILL_C
One other post raised the question of WHY Bush doesn't go after Clinton. W may have been waiting for the right time, which may be now.Man, I hope you're right about that. I'm currently VERY disillusioned with the GOP and our left leaning leadership.
54
posted on
07/20/2004 8:58:53 PM PDT
by
ovrtaxt
(Palm Beach voters: It's not the heat, it's the stupidity.)
To: BILL_C
Bill loves conspiracy, It's a license to lie. And that's what he does best!
Bump
Former President Bill Clinton (news - web sites) responds to questions before autographing copies of his book during an appearance at a downtown Denver bookstore Tuesday, July 20, 2004. (AP Photo/David Zalubowski)
55
posted on
07/20/2004 9:00:35 PM PDT
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi Mac ... Godspeed x40 ... Support Our Troops!!! ......Become a FR Monthly Donor ...)
To: ovrtaxt
Specter is going to lose anyways. Sayonara infiltrator.
To: Texas Eagle
I guess when the story of Bush's drunken driving arrest came out 3 days before the election there was no political motivation.
To: BILL_C
This may be a little off-topic, but Spain has been having hearings regarding the March 11 terrorist attack. One thing that emerged is that ETA (native terrorist group) and the Muslims had stolen cars in the same town on the same day and were headed for the same place. Both were stopped by the police (for false license plates). The ETA members were arrested and their van was searched, revealing 1000 lbs of dynamite; the Moroccans were stopped but were only cited (for a counterfeit license plate!) and their van (which also contained hundreds of pounds of explosives) was not searched.
In the case of Spain, the domestic terrorists working with the Islamists were caught, but the foreign terrorists eventually succeeded and did the deed ; in the case of OKC, only the domestic terrorists with whom the Muslims were working were caught, or, for that matter, even searched for, probably thanks to the Clinton Rules.
58
posted on
07/20/2004 9:01:52 PM PDT
by
livius
To: BILL_C
One other post raised the question of WHY Bush doesn't go after Clinton.
I've thought about this a lot, and I know a lot of FReepers are really on GW's case about not going after Clinton. My personal view is that GWB is trying to protect the PRESIDENCY - not Bill Clinton - but the office of President of the United States. I understand, as I think it would be devastaing for the country, as well as world stability, to think that a president of the United States would cover up something of this magnitude.
For money? I don't think so, the presidency carries with it so many perks, and even the period after the presidency. Money rolls in. Look at the oodles of cash the Clinton and Hillary are raking in, via books, speeches, public appearances. I think it is all about the power. There is nothing like being the most powerful person in the world, is there. What a rush, as we used to say.
59
posted on
07/20/2004 9:02:48 PM PDT
by
baseballmom
(Michael Moore - An un-American Hatriot)
To: BigSkyFreeper
Berger was in there lifting out Clinton's obvious foreign policy failures from the document stack
If a few of us are right on this, Berger was in there getting information on Clinton's ties to terrorism years before 9-11.
There are many people that know pieces of these conspiracy incidents but only a few that understand that some lies are being told.
You can't let documents fall in the hands of those who don't know the details.
60
posted on
07/20/2004 9:06:25 PM PDT
by
BILL_C
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 301 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson