Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Berger friends challenge sock-stuffing charge
WorldNetDaily ^ | July 20, 2004

Posted on 07/20/2004 6:15:31 PM PDT by traumer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last
To: traumer

Okay, that settles it. Now I believe Sandy Berger because Joe Lockhart says I should. /SARCASM!!!


21 posted on 07/20/2004 7:15:40 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
"Leftist male has trouble getting Bush. Rolls up classified docs and stuffs in pants."

This reminds me of an old joke:

Stosh and his American cousin Joe were on the beach ogling all the girls. Stosh asked Joe how he could make himself more attractive to the girls so they'd talk to him. Joe told Stosh: "Next time we come to the beach, stuff a potato inside your trunks. The girls will love it!"

So, the next time Stosh goes to the beach, he puts a potato in his swim trunks. But everytime he tries to talk to a girl, she makes a face and turns away. When he finds his cousin Joe on the beach, Stosh asks him: "Joe, I did what you told me to do. I put a potato in my swim trunks, but I can't get any girls to talk to me." Joe looks Stosh over and says: "Stosh, next time, try putting the potato in front!"

22 posted on 07/20/2004 7:17:51 PM PDT by mass55th (We are The Knights Who Say "Ni!" No! Not The Knights Who Say "Ni!" The same!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ScottFromSpokane
So I think we can assume that the documents he stuffed in his socks were the notes he made. The documents he stole, he stuffed somewhere else.

As someone suggsted on another thread, perhaps he put the footnotes in his socks. (Sorry, I just couldn't help it.)

23 posted on 07/20/2004 7:21:19 PM PDT by Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: traumer

The question is not whether Berger stuffed his socks with papers but whether he stuffs his underwear with his socks.


24 posted on 07/20/2004 7:28:14 PM PDT by Holden Magroin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traumer

"Berger has said he regrets the "sloppiness" involved in his actions."

Is that a public apology to the Clintons for botching up the job; fear of being Fosterized?


25 posted on 07/20/2004 7:32:09 PM PDT by streetpreacher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traumer
"Joe Lockhart, Clinton's former spokesman, says Berger "categorically denies that he ever took documents and stuffed them in his socks," according to CNN."

Klintoon translation:" Berger stole documents and stuffed them into his pants"...

See how it works?

26 posted on 07/20/2004 7:34:33 PM PDT by lawdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traumer
Joe Lockhart, Clinton's former spokesman, says Berger "categorically denies that he ever took documents and stuffed them in his socks," according to CNN.

I believe Lockhart --- Berger didn't stuff documents in his socks --- it would be too hard with most socks to put any kind of documents into them and think they wouldn't fall out and you'd be caught. He also didn't stuff them down his trousers because there would be nothing stopping the documents from sliding down and falling out the pant-leg opening. He stuffed them down his underpants so he could walk out knowing they'd stay in place.

27 posted on 07/20/2004 7:34:36 PM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traumer

Dems must defeat the allegation of "concealing" the documents in clothes etc. The act of concealing demonstrates "fore-knowledge of the evidence of wrongdoing."


28 posted on 07/20/2004 7:36:59 PM PDT by ez (TERRORISTS FOR KERRY!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thatcher; antonia
Typical Clinton administration! Where most pretenders would simple stuff their socks and pants or brassiers with Kleenex or cotton balls, the Bergerler must use top secret documents. Oh he's soooo special ~ not throw him in jail and throw away the key!

29 posted on 07/20/2004 7:38:28 PM PDT by Bea Elysian (Paradise is always where love dwells.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

It's interesting that the most frequently-seen defenders of Clinton during the impeachment period, Lanny Davis and Peter Fenn, have suddenly re-appeard now.


30 posted on 07/20/2004 7:39:03 PM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ez

I think with dems this is just another "depends on what you mean by 'is'" --- just a word game their playing to confuse those stupid enough to vote for them. He would have to have had pretty big socks to hold any kind of documents --- he never stuffed the documents into socks to steal them --- but they're not saying he didn't steal them or remove them illegally.


31 posted on 07/20/2004 7:42:35 PM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: FITZ
think with dems this is just another "depends on what you mean by 'is'" --- just a word game their playing to confuse those stupid enough to vote for them.

They are lawyers after all...

32 posted on 07/20/2004 7:47:29 PM PDT by ez (TERRORISTS FOR KERRY!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: traumer
Joe Lockhart claims ex-aide didn't hide secret docs in his hose

Joe Lockhart is a well paid political motivator for the Dem's.

What the he!! is he thinking when making such a statement?

33 posted on 07/20/2004 7:48:04 PM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: expatpat
It's interesting that the most frequently-seen defenders of Clinton during the impeachment period, Lanny Davis and Peter Fenn, have suddenly re-appeard now.

No doubt. That alone should set off bells with the public.

The flying monkeys are in the air again...

34 posted on 07/20/2004 7:58:03 PM PDT by ez (TERRORISTS FOR KERRY!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: traumer

35 posted on 07/20/2004 7:58:43 PM PDT by The Bronze Titan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

'Did Lanny say that with a straight face?' Lanny never says anything with a straight face. He always has that silly grin as if everything in politics, no matter how serious, is just "fun and games".


36 posted on 07/20/2004 8:55:08 PM PDT by Winfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

So is he copping to the pants and jacket, but not the socks?


37 posted on 07/20/2004 8:57:10 PM PDT by Howlin (~~~~Today is my sixth year FR anniversary~~~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

It sure sounds like it but, as you know, when it's the clinton clan you never take anything at face value.


38 posted on 07/20/2004 9:01:55 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Bea Elysian

Beware of the

Secret Brief Sock Bergler


39 posted on 07/20/2004 9:03:29 PM PDT by antonia ("Democracy is the worst type of government, excepting all others." ~ Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: traumer

bttt


40 posted on 07/20/2004 9:03:42 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson