Berger standing next to Kerry standing next to Clinton ....
Posted on 07/20/2004 1:11:47 PM PDT by gopwinsin04
SEN. SAXBY CHAMBLISS: 'Reportedly these documents are related to homeland security and then suddenly we see the Kerry campaign came forward with what may have been illegal documents. This is sensitive stuff and was a significant breach of security...Kerry knows better than to use these documents,' Chambliss says in a press conference.
SEN. GORDON SMITH: 'There is a curious connection between the removal of these documents and the Kerry press conference on port security..It's disappointing what people might do as they try and take the President down.
Resigned.....no kidding.
Fox interviewed ex-Special Prosecutor Marvin Weissberg and he assured viewers that the DOJ takes this very seriously....despite what the Dims believe ....that leaking the incident was (gag) political.
Thanks Gramps. The republicans sure are getting good at their Rope-A-Dope game, aren't they!?
Hannity is on radio taking calls from libs with excuses for Berger.
Thanks for your comment. The way it worked at the archives the times I went was that you had to show them your notes on paper they gave you. I think. It's been years. If he hid his own notes, it shows he was knowingly hiding archival material. Otherwise he would show all his notes so they could look for their stamped papers.As I explained, archival material is not all typed and important-looking. It is often a paper torn out of a secretary's steno-pad. What he did was probably not inadvertant. If he had been careless but shown them his notes at the check-out, the guards would have found the archives. He has to say he did this accidentally. I doubt this, but I think that he just didn't want to take all those notes and then write up his speech for the 9-11 Commission at home without the documents.
Really, he should have been given temporary copies or something. He was an important official who was asked to testify in Congress. Why should he be taking notes like some undergraduate in the pre-computer age? That is such drudgery. Hw can't say that because he would have to admit he stole the documents to save himself work.
Berger took two "slightly different" copies - yeah the one that tells the truth and the one redacted by the Clintons...
I figured there'd be a thread, but FR is so slow for me today, that I can barely navigate! I'll go look again. Thanks.
I think this is disinformation....I think Burglar took those documents to DESTROY them because they shed a terrible light on CLINTON!
Berger standing next to Kerry standing next to Clinton ....
I agree.
But Gergen really meant that the Kerry camp would suffer if Berger stepped down ... by loosing a valuable foreign policy expert. ... LOL !!!
LOL. and I should be working now.
If this is true then Kerry is finished.
Oooh, you put your post in gearhead terms. I like that.
Yeah, right. Only 3/4 of FR have been conspirorizing this for the last year, and not a single Republican in DC won't have a clue???
I think both are cleaning "redacted stains" out of their shorts...
Chris Lehane spinning madly on FOX News. What a queen!
"In other words, Berger burgles, passes it to Kerry, and Kerry exploits it by politicizing port security (in the press release in 101).----.30Carbine discovered that someone at Kerry04 had scrubbed evidence of this presumed exploitation from the Kerry website today, the day the Senators made their oblique accusation. This would indicate a sense of guilt at Kerry04."
Deserves a bump! Good find .30carbine!
One wonders how that would go over on pay TV?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.