[LibFreeUSA]

-"President Clinton's national security advisor, Samuel R. Berger, inadvertently removed classified national security documents from the National Archives..."

I don't need to read beyond this.

[Indy Pendance]

That's as far as I got too.

[Spok]

-"President Clinton's national security advisor, Samuel R. Berger, inadvertently removed classified national security documents from the National Archives..."

In his sock. No spin here.

[Dane]

-"President Clinton's national security advisor, Samuel R. Berger, inadvertently removed classified national security documents from the National Archives...

What? You don't inadvertenly stuff papers in your socks and pants. Weirdo.(New DNC talking points)

[kellynla]

inadvertently
Must be the DNC talking point of the day...LOL

And "Fat Sandy Burglar" is inadvertently indicted!

Sandy will look sweet in an orange jump suit! LMAO

[Badeye]

Same here. Inadvertent my backside.

[Republican Red]

I was listening to the local news break during Rush's show. Paul Mann the news reporter at WGST also called it inadvertent.

I just emailed him a lengthy email asking how one inadvertently stuffs documents down his pants.

[BigLittle]

Berger Medium Well, please. Oh!, and I'll have it Willie style......hold the bun!

[BigLittle]

Berger Medium Well, please. Oh!, and I'll have it Willie style......hold the bun!

[FourtySeven]

"President Clinton's national security advisor, Samuel R. Berger, inadvertently removed classified national security documents from the National Archives..."

Indeed. The spin of the Slimes is so grossly apparent. While every other news source is correctly reporting that he INTENTIONALLY took his notes out (a violation of the Archive's procedures at LEAST, if not the law), he "inadvertently" took some actual documents too.

Point being of course, the Slimes here portrays his actions as completely inadvertent, which is simply not the case, even in Berger's own words!!!!!!!! Do they mention this elsewhere in the article? I don't know. Nor do I care anymore. That paper is such a rag I'm not going to waste my time looking at the entire piece.

The bias is obvious, as in the first sentence they already try to get the reader in a mindset that it was "all a mistake".

[teletech]

-"President Clinton's national security advisor, Samuel R. Berger, inadvertently removed classified national security documents from the National Archives..."

I don't need to read beyond this.

How does one "inadvertently" stuff documents in ones pants?