Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sandy Berger Hires Clinton Lawyer Lanny Breuer, Contacts Prosecutors..'willing to cooperate'
CNN Morning Grind Politcs Memo ^ | 7/20/04 | John Mercurio

Posted on 07/20/2004 9:54:48 AM PDT by gopwinsin04

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-135 next last
To: TontoKowalski; Mo1; Sacajaweau
If he has half a brain, those documents haven't been "misplaced" or destroyed. They are in third-party hands with instructions to release to the media in the event of a tragic accident/heart attack/suicide.

And he's let certain parties know this.

I think you are exactly right. And I'm sure he has half a brain. He was a politician BEFORE he was National Security Advisor under Clinton, so I imagine he knows exactly how all that works...

101 posted on 07/20/2004 10:59:38 AM PDT by Judith Anne (Just another Bush-bot biddy drinking that Republican KoolAid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: eureka!
Maybe he thought he could beat the rap or perhaps he didn't know what kind of evidence the Justice Department had. Normally, the subject of the investigation is one of the last people interviewed in-depth. Perhaps, Bergler got wind of the evidence and is now trying to short-circuit the investigation forcing the government's hand on what evidence they have. His admission is pretty damning in and of itself, which leads me to believe that the evidence is pretty strong.

As far as the timing is concerned, you could also make a case that Justice could have forced his hand. Whatever the reason, the timing is not bad for GWB. LOL.

102 posted on 07/20/2004 11:00:17 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: gopwinsin04
Sandy Berger is covering his ass.

How can 911 comission make a report when they didn't have all the documents.

But of course, it's just like WACO, they get rid of all the things damaging to them.

Sandy Berger believes, just like Mr. Perry, that our soventy should be turned over to the United Nations.

103 posted on 07/20/2004 11:00:33 AM PDT by take
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Solson

Possible but if he is on video tape, with "marked" docs, caught in a sting op, he's toast. Although Marion Barry got reelected AFTER his bust smoking/selling crack.


104 posted on 07/20/2004 11:05:06 AM PDT by gunnygail (Better my sister in a whorehouse than my brother voting DEMOCRAT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau; Judith Anne
I was of the mind that the leak was a McAuliffe calculation--get it out now, in July, instead of letting the Bush campaign use it in Oct.

However, you posit an interesting alternative theory.

Certainly, the very fact Berger did this at all suggests that the info contained in the documents was explosive.

It was an extraordinarily risky undertaking--and yet, Berger, weighing his options, apparently decided that stealing classified documents was LESS risky than leaving them there. Whatever consequences he might suffer for the theft did not, in his mind, rise to the level of what would happen if the documents come to light.

So now, having failed to complete the coverup, the very same consequences he so feared are back in play. Perhaps you're right. He'd rather take his chances with an ethical justice dept. than with whomever those documents finger.

105 posted on 07/20/2004 11:06:04 AM PDT by Eroteme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: eureka!

Another thought on timing. Bergler leaked to the press just prior to the release of the 9/11 report and the Dem convention to portray himself as a victim of a political attack by the GOP. He knows he is guilty, but he will get more public and Dem support by linking his investigation to these two upcoming events. After all, he is a Kerry adviser.


106 posted on 07/20/2004 11:06:12 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Dog
He wants to cop a plea..

Or will he pull a Web and back out at least minute??

The fact the Dems are blaming this on the big bad VRWC leads me to believe they were caught off guard about this investigation

107 posted on 07/20/2004 11:06:32 AM PDT by Mo1 (50 States .... I want all 50 States come November!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
The fact the Dems are blaming this on the big bad VRWC leads me to believe they were caught off guard about this investigation. I am a card carrying member of the VRWC and the board never authorized this! HAHA! I think that it was the ACLU (American Communists and Liberals Union) behind this. Trying to make us honest VRWC types look bad!
108 posted on 07/20/2004 11:09:21 AM PDT by gunnygail (Better my sister in a whorehouse than my brother voting DEMOCRAT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: kabar

Good points. ABC News on the hour did the "timing is suspicious" spin. Oh well, methinks Bergler is in a world of hurt and has got to be hating ever having hooked up with the Clintons...


109 posted on 07/20/2004 11:12:01 AM PDT by eureka! (May karma come back to the presstitutes and Rats in a material way.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: spectre

If he's no longer employed in a Government position, he should've had his Security clearance terminated, without prejudice, when he left that position.


110 posted on 07/20/2004 11:16:10 AM PDT by Inspectorette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: gunnygail
Sure, if the media actually paid attention to this. The media will sweep it under a rug as the final report of the 911 commission comes out.

That will be the main media focus. It won't matter if bin Laden was seen having lunch with Sandy Berger in 1998, the media's sole focus is the destruction of a Bush Presidency.

111 posted on 07/20/2004 11:17:14 AM PDT by Solson ("Ugly knows ugly though." - WorkingClassFilth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: A Citizen Reporter

I wonder if the NY Times is going to make as big a fuss over Sandy Bergler's UNDERWEAR as they did with the AbU Garbage UNDERWEAR story.


112 posted on 07/20/2004 11:18:01 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: bobo1
I read that Berger was given "marked" documents. It would have been stupid to have not made copies of those documents before allowing him access.

Surely the agency has copies of these documents and Sandy seems to be CYA mode right now.

...and he must stay in the open, out of small planes and be on the boob tube constantly...watch out for cars from AR. :/

113 posted on 07/20/2004 11:22:05 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass (Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: finnigan2
As an aside, I think that with the timing of the release of this information, Dubya has just raised and called the Dems in the poker hand of politics.

The dems have known about this since last October. They have had every opportunity to leak it at a time of their choosing.

114 posted on 07/20/2004 11:26:03 AM PDT by js1138 (In a minute there is time, for decisions and revisions which a minute will reverse. J Forbes Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: gunnygail
I am a card carrying member of the VRWC and the board never authorized this!

ROFL

It must have been John Kerry. He authorized it before he vetoed it. Or was it the other way around ?

Berger is his national security advisor ...

115 posted on 07/20/2004 11:27:43 AM PDT by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Eroteme
I was of the mind that the leak was a McAuliffe calculation...He'd rather take his chances with an ethical justice dept. than with whomever those documents finger.

Good point :))

116 posted on 07/20/2004 11:28:43 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass (Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

I doubt Clinton put Berger up to this. I'm betting that Kerry did it. Kerry is pulling ahead in the electoral vote now. He's not destructing--at least not yet. The polling now shows that he's ahead in Fla.

Don't expect that Clinton will knock off Kerry for us.


117 posted on 07/20/2004 11:29:03 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: TontoKowalski
BTW, I can't believe Berger was stupid enough NOT to realize that he wasn't being filmed as he shoved those documents in his pants and socks.

It is even scarier to think he was in charge of national security while Bill Clinton was playing Kobe Bryant.

118 posted on 07/20/2004 11:29:26 AM PDT by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Wil H
Oh yes he DID! there are documents MISSING .

Marked copies are missing.

That means either John Kerry or his staff have them, reporters have them (we'll consider all reporters to be foreign nationals until proven otherwise), or the dog ate them ...

I think Hillary Clinton can help with this investigation.

119 posted on 07/20/2004 11:31:43 AM PDT by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: gopwinsin04
Anybody else been wondering if all those FBI files that had gone missing for so long had been secreted in the ample recesses of a certain black pantsuit?
120 posted on 07/20/2004 11:53:48 AM PDT by atomicpossum (I give up! Entropy, you win!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-135 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson