Posted on 07/19/2004 8:42:16 PM PDT by Roscoe Karns
This is why he stole the documents and "lost" them: http://www.nationalreview.com/levin/levin200404151634.asp
Same here, regarding GWB. Let's hope this story has LEGS...
Levenworth for this girlieman, unlessmaybe, he can get Webb Hubble to do the time for him. Experience counts in these things.
Looks like they screwed up on this one, and got caught, though.
so is Mr. Berger the reason Kerry didnt think he needed to attend Whitehouse security briefings? hmmmmm......
The material he stuffed down his pants must be very damaging. He was delusional and paranoid. Never figured he'd be taped.
Now he won't be able to get a job as a security guard at K-Mart.
ping!
Unless of cours we put on our tin foil hats and assume Hillary leaked it as to torpedo the Kerry campaign and then knowing all this will blow over by '08.
The only way these jack-in-the-box clowns on the scumbag 9-11 Commission are going to "connect the dots" is if the dots form a picture of Bush. It is indeed fortunate that the commission has the credibility of a mouse turd. Sitting right there on the commission is the single most important witness they have (Gorelich), and she has yet to be publicly questioned. The commission's "final report" will not be worth the paper it's printed on.
Regards,
LH
Now that I have it on, you're right...that makes perfect sense!
Well done Sir well done
From Ashcroft testimony, we learned that the Clinton team did not tell anyone on the Bush team about a highly classified review. The review warned of al Qaeda cells and the danger they were posing inside the U.S. We were unbelievably lucky to keep LAX from being blown apart on the eve of the new Millenium. It was basically a fluke and one alert agent.
Here are Ashcroft's words:
I did not see the highly-classified review before September 11. It was not among the 30 items upon which my predecessor briefed me during the transition. It was not advocated as a disruption strategy to me during the summer threat period by the NSC staff which wrote the review more than a year earlier. --- end quote ---
We now find out that Berger stole the documents from a secured reading room. This story is going to absolutely explode! Kerry is going to have to dump Berger. Our side has a monumentally important issue that will not only damage Kerry but also damage the Clintons. Wow.
It defeats the campaign purpose if one is officially briefed and then gagged.
And then? He sent his national security advisor to steal the documents? Wow!
I would ask how deep does this go? Did Clinton KNOW an attack was about to take place and turned a blind eye because he WANTED it to happen? How deep does this go!
As long as our side gets some spine and.... finally.... goes for the throat.
Its a good thing Clinton is in France right now
.
No kidding. I have to wonder, though, why no one approached him and asked for the papers. If we now know that he stuffed them in his pants and jacket, someone must have seen it happen at the time. Maybe this "secure room" needs more security or, at least, more assertive security personnel.
WE can blame the media for their silence, for their slience is expected. But the Administration, for once, has to raise holy hell about something the Democrats do for cryin' out loud!!!
ABC News tonight had a segment about the Senate Intelligence Report and the Butler Report from Britain that discredited Joe Wilson's claims about the "yellow cake" uranium from Niger.
If they couldn't ignore that, I don't see how they could ignore this.
bttt
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.