Skip to comments.
Ashcroft: Berger 9/11 Docs Reveal Clinton Security Lapse
NewsMax ^
| 7/19/04
| Carl Limbacher
Posted on 07/19/2004 7:24:23 PM PDT by wagglebee
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-127 next last
To: Howlin
Didn't Berger also take his classified, archived notes from some Mideast Peace Talks in the 90s?
The notes taken within the secure room at the Archives may have been taken because they needed the exact wording. Berger is no longer young and we all know how memory deteriorates.
I have this mental picture that the viewer watched this take place, while cameras recorded it, after Berger *lost* a previous copy of this document and was given a marked 2nd copy and then, after he left, they sat there dithering "What to do? What to do?" and finally first called Bruce Lindsay instead of the FBI?
Who called the FBI and when?
101
posted on
07/20/2004 4:10:10 AM PDT
by
reformedliberal
(Proud Bush-Cheney04 volunteer)
To: wagglebee
No, they always say they did something stupid and "didn't know" so they can deflect from their flaunting of the law.
Not unlike Craig Livinstone, et al.
So typical.
To: Howlin
103
posted on
07/20/2004 4:13:43 AM PDT
by
reformedliberal
(Proud Bush-Cheney04 volunteer)
To: wagglebee
What useless scum.
This is the true Clinton Legacy.
104
posted on
07/20/2004 4:20:32 AM PDT
by
Stallone
(Make love not war! ~ Lynndie England)
To: cyncooper
There is some obfuscation going on in the media reports (surprise):
Berger not only took his notes on the Millennium Report out of the secure reading room, he also had in his possession handwritten classified note cards from a Mideast Peace Talk in the 90s. I am not clear if he had these already classified and already archived note cards from the 90s in his possession when they searched his office for the current missing documents. If so, then this is not the first time he has pilfered from the archives and who knows what has been doctored and returned previously or is plain missing from the record. Someone hopefully is reviewing the Archives tapes from previous Berger visits as we speak or has already done so. Berger's lawyer is already trying to spin this down to a technical rule violation, which isn't going to wash if there is a pattern of this behavior.
NSA. God help us all.
105
posted on
07/20/2004 4:22:22 AM PDT
by
reformedliberal
(Proud Bush-Cheney04 volunteer)
To: wagglebee
OK. Now this needs to be capitalised upon. Do what the Dems would do if it were the other way around. Lets start a freeper e-mail campaign to start congressional hearings. This coulkd be almost as big as Watergate. I'm e-mailing my senators today. Get on board.
106
posted on
07/20/2004 4:24:34 AM PDT
by
dokmad
To: Tamsey
BERGER, SAMUEL
WASHINGTON,DC 20016
STONEBRIDGE INTL/PRESIDENT/PRESIDEN
10/11/2002
$1,000
Andreasen, Steven Peter
I remember this name. Clarke also donated to this guy, who was a DFL (Democrat Farm Labor=socialist) candidate for Congress in MN and a former NSC advisor. There was another MN DFLer that Clarke donated to, also a former NSC advisor.
107
posted on
07/20/2004 4:30:14 AM PDT
by
reformedliberal
(Proud Bush-Cheney04 volunteer)
To: reformedliberal
Fox and Friends this morning (Tues.) had a copy of the NYT. Searching it for the Berger story, they finally found it on page A-17......at the bottom of the page!
Does anyone here have a copy of the front page and can tell us what the NYT considered MORE important news?
108
posted on
07/20/2004 4:41:06 AM PDT
by
Carolinamom
(The media are not elected; THEY are selected.)
To: Toespi
When asked why he took the documents Berger said...
"Because I could."
After all he is a Clintonista... and they are never held responsible for anything they do.
To: MojoWire
Senator Kerry,
If you are elected will you pardon Sandy Berger for his crimes against the security of the U.S. the way Bill Clinton did for so many of his political supporters?
To: upchuck
Time to let "Ashcroft be Ashcroft" and truly make a federal case out of this. Partisan Republicans need some red meat to rally around and this looks bloody...
To: upchuck
>> But there comes a time when even the nicest of guyz has to stand up and fight.
Agree. If President Bush is the Christian he claims to be he will follow James 4:7, which reads, "...Resist the devil, and he will flee from you".
To: cyncooper
Yes, that's why I used the words "much of."
113
posted on
07/20/2004 5:14:51 AM PDT
by
ScottFromSpokane
(Re-elect President Bush: http://spokanegop.org/bush.html)
To: plain talk
Why weren't they trashing the dems and Clinton admin over their screwup on national security for years? The dems are still trashing President Bush for the low down dirty campaign he ran against Gore. Everyone and their dog (think Helen Thomas) reported that the campaign contradicted the "new tone" claim. Their biggest gripe - that then candidate Bush had the audacity to state that he and Cheney would bring honor and dignity back to the White House. Can you imagine the uproar if Clinton's cornucopia of national security failures were even mentioned much less completely exposed?
114
posted on
07/20/2004 5:27:05 AM PDT
by
Quilla
To: Don Joe
No. It's not FBI files or such hogwash. Not every single Republican congressman or administration official is being blackmailed. That's nonsense. What I am talking about extends across the board to all of them. It's really very simple. They're all intimidated by the left controlled media. They go on a talk show and it's two to one. They were briefly confident after 1994 but it disappeared with the the government shutdown fiasco.
To: Quilla
Right. The Republicans aren't supposed to say squat and just act like neutered pups. Even FReepers on this thread are scared to death of what Helen Thomas is going to say about Bush's "new tone" and thus don't want him to fight back for fear of offending the media. It's cowardly.
To: plain talk
I'm all for exposing each and every failure of the Clinton Administration. That's what brought me to Free Republic in the first place. I want that man behind bars.
117
posted on
07/20/2004 5:47:17 AM PDT
by
Quilla
To: wagglebee
The New York Times: (212) 556-7652
The New York Post: (212) 930-8000
ABC: 212-456-7777
CBS: 212-975-4321
NBC: 212-664-4444
CNN: 404-237-0234
Fox:1-888-369-4762
NY York Daily News (212) 210-NEWS
118
posted on
07/20/2004 8:20:50 AM PDT
by
votelife
(Calling abortion a women's issue is like calling war a men's issue!)
To: ScottFromSpokane
119
posted on
07/20/2004 9:50:37 AM PDT
by
votelife
(Calling abortion a women's issue is like calling war a men's issue!)
To: MizSterious
it's revealed that Berger stuffed them in his pants to sneak them out "Is that a secret document, or are you glad to see me?"
120
posted on
07/20/2004 9:53:48 AM PDT
by
steve-b
(Panties & Leashes Would Look Good On Spammers)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-127 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson