To: Sub-Driver
He stuck documents in his pants, and it was inadvertent!
15 posted on
07/19/2004 5:13:05 PM PDT by
Bahbah
To: Bahbah
"He stuck documents in his pants, and it was inadvertent!"
Maybe he couldn't locate his roll of dimes.
123 posted on
07/19/2004 5:40:07 PM PDT by
mass55th
(We are The Knights Who Say "Ni!" No! Not The Knights Who Say "Ni!" The same!)
To: Bahbah
He stuck documents in his pants, and it was inadvertent! It's even worse than that. He knowingly smuggled documents out of the room in his pants...inadvertantly.
All I know is if it were the republicans who had done this, the presstitutes would be shouting it from the rooftops. This would finally get abu graib off the front pages.
171 posted on
07/19/2004 5:51:27 PM PDT by
alnick
To: Bahbah
He stuck documents in his pants, and it was inadvertent!Well, I guess as long as you don't stick them in someone else's pants...[snicker].
195 posted on
07/19/2004 5:54:53 PM PDT by
Wolfstar
(Get off your duffs and VOTE for Bush-Cheney in Nov. Your life may depend on it.)
To: Bahbah
He stuck documents in his pants, and it was inadvertent!you know, if you didn't read the article it would still be a funny statement
602 posted on
07/19/2004 7:10:40 PM PDT by
InvisibleChurch
(I actually did vote for the $87 billion before I voted against it)
To: Bahbah
"He stuck documents in his pants, and it was inadvertent!"
His boss stuck interns in his pants and it was Starr's fault.
Makes perfect sense to a Democrat.
To: Bahbah
You said..........He stuck documents in his pants, and it was inadvertent!
Isn't that DISGUSTING??? I guess we are to be thankful that a Clintonoid had his pants ON!
1,104 posted on
07/19/2004 8:49:59 PM PDT by
Ann Archy
(Abortion: The Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
To: Bahbah
"He stuck documents in his pants, and it was inadvertent!"Well of COURSE he stuck the documents in his pants!
It was the Clinton Administration, after all, and they were ALL about pants.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson