Posted on 07/19/2004 5:07:42 PM PDT by Sub-Driver
Thanks--I'm reading my pings and making my way through the thread and will keep an eye out for #624. I just found several articles and the tone was just as I recalled. Make it seem the Bush administration was holding information back when here was Berger destroying it.
The audacity is breathtaking. This is just like it was all the time during that administration. Good GOD.
"Charles Ruff - Heart attack."
You're correct. Don't know why Bob Bennett popped into my head.....he was also involved in the defense as I recall but it was Ruff that argued at the impeachment hearing.
I can't believe how stupid and arrogant Clinton and his people are. This makes Watergate look lame.
"I remember that something that Rumsfeld said to Hillary! really seemed to rattle her."
I also remember her being rattled....but I believe Hillary made a comment about something, and Rumsfield replied, "I don't know how you would know that....when the Pentagon hasn't seen it." I am sure I quoted this wrong, but it was something like that. Really can't remember what Hillary's comment was. Sure someone here can clear this up for us. My old brain is tired right now!!
It all might be informative in understanding why the Dems have been going after Cheney from day one. I love the President, but when it comes down to political war, Cheney strikes me as having both the experience, relationships and mind to outwit the Dems.
"Maybe Hillary knew this shoe would drop and that is why she was hesitant about speaking and Dem Convention."
"WASHINGTON - President Clinton (news - web sites)'s national security adviser, Sandy Berger, is the focus of a criminal investigation after admitting he removed highly classified terrorism documents from a secure reading room during preparations for the Sept. 11 commission hearings, The Associated Press has learned."
Initially that is what I thought, however, if the leak had come from the Bush administration the AP would have made sure that came out. So maybe it was from Hillry's camp that did this huge dump just prior to the convention.
Just broke on AP that they think Berger took
documents that replaced documents he took earlier.
Link?
Perhaps the reason the WH didn't turn over all the Clinton records Lindsay demanded was this....they were too busy comparing them with the originals - to see just what Berger had replaced. LOL. I do love a good conspiracy!
Hmmmmm ... the plot thickens
I don't have the link.
I am being mailed this info.
The originals and copies do not match, someone doctored them and Berger was attempting to correct.
Yeah, and you probably think that Terry McAwful wasn't investigated for insider trading because of political consideration just because he made so much more than Martha.
We know that Ashcroft is totally fair,but if he investigates all these rats three months out from Nov 2, we know the criminal media will say it is partisan GOP out to get the innocent rats.
Of all the sitting members on the commission, who was in the best position of knowing which documents might be the most incriminating towards the Clinton administration?
I’m not calling any names, but the initials are Jammie Grolick.
So, in order to "get" the documents they needed to see, the commission had to know the document existed and ask for it?
I still remember Albright criticizing Bush for naming Iran as part of the axis of evil. She said that the Clinton administration had made real progress in the relationship and that Bush's remarks threatened their work.
Could this be what Berger REALLY did?
We need to keep our eyes open and our keyboards at the ready.
We're aware that the Dims love playing the "victim" card.
It's the only thing that makes the disturbed self-haters feel good about themselves.
They are frantic to begin the whining, and assuming the position of "victim" ....to deflect blame and save their sorry rumps.
Watch Kerry start expresiing his "tolerance and compassion" for that Pantload Berger.
We'll just see about that.
Look in AOL Update news.
That's what I have just been told.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.