Posted on 07/17/2004 6:42:27 PM PDT by faludeh_shirazi
AIN'T IT ABOUT TIME?
Time to saddle up and start another operation. May I suggest we use ALL the weapons at our disposal this time?
Provides ammunition for taking to UN and Security Council.(if need be)
Lets take out the Mullahs - support opposition in country and not hit Iranian people - jesus we Iranians hate the mullahs more than anyone else!
This is what I posted on anothe thread on why we Ivaded Iraq, not Iran::
Because by invading Iraq, we established a western front against Iran
We are in their south in the gulf
we are in their east in Afghanistan
we are in their west in Iraq
and we have Russian bases we can attack from if they let us
We are now in a place to monitor and possible strike against any position in Iran on a moments notice or with little buildup.
My tin foil hat theory of the Iraq war is deeper than terorism of Saddam, it is terrorism of Iran, the world's most prominent supporter of terrorism since 1979.
By now surrounding Iran, we have them in a box.
If we can get a new Afghan Army or the Pakistanis with us, and the Saudis who HATE the Iranians, we will go in in a heartbeat.
God help the Iranian men and women who actually like us. If we do invade, that wont last too long when they see our 'allies' in that war.
There is NO WAY we can invade Iran without a draft, not a chance in the world.
One of the strategic realities of the Iraq campaign is the fact that strong American armored and air formations lie on the Iranian frontier. Iran is basically open to invasion. However, the terrain, especially in the Zagros mountains, can be forbidding in some spots.
Now then; what does this mean politically? A whole can of worms, of course. The Dems will say we aimed at the wrong target (not that they ever intended to do anything against anybody, of course). How and ever, Bush can go back to his 2002 SOU speech in which he defined the Axis Powers and say to the American people that he told them it was going to be a long war, with several enemies.
There is good and bad in this, but there is also clarity.
We are very close to having the casus belli needed to take down Iran's nuclear program.
Be Seeing You,
Chris
Checked out your site. Nice. I'll be back.
The following is not quite the hot smoking gun required in lieu of the lukewarm reception the UN generally gives Anglo warnings:
Something about this just does not compute.
Iranian "people" chose their fate in 1979. They went from a prestigious monarchy to a militant, islamic nightmare. Democracy alone will not cure your country's ills. You must remove ISLAM as well as the MULLAHS.
Bttt
ahm and lets leave reporters behind this time
I saw the Big Picture early on, when Iraq followed Afghanistan. Notice how Iran and even Syria is surrounded!
We have no quarrel with the majority of Iranians. We had no quarrel with the majority of Iraqis. Iran is allegedly on the brink of overthrowing the mullahs - if we had the proper number of CIA agents on the ground in Iran, we could aid in getting rid of the islamofacists running the country w/o having to drop a bomb.
I agree we need to take the Mullahs out HOWEVER I don't agree with you using the name of my Savior in such a manner
One flaw; otherwise your strategy is perfect: Russia, if I am not mistaken has signed a recent pact with Iran. If so we cannot use their bases.
Thanks for sharing that.
Some forget that the regime does NOT represent the people. The Iranian people are victims of the regime. It's important to distinguish between the population and the government of Iran.
Actually = I'm catholic, so I guess it's the name of my savior as well ehh? Every met an Iranian Catholic? They exist..
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.