Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Osama's Revenge: THE NEXT 9/11: What the Media and the Government Haven't Told You
NewsMax.com ^ | July 16, 2004 | NewsMax Store Staff

Posted on 07/16/2004 1:05:47 PM PDT by CHARLITE

I'm wondering how liberals can laugh this off. Seems to me that the same people now scoffing at any such threat would have busted a gut laughing on Sept. 10th at "any such threat" of 4 planes loaded with jet fuel, being used as deadly missiles aimed at the WTC, US Capitol and White House. Read below..........then continue to laugh, if you can. Paul Williams must be just another "nut," maybe like Brian Sullivan who hand-delivered (APRIL,04) proof TO JOHN F. KERRY, that planes from LOGAN AIRPORT were about to be used as weapons against cities in America! Kerry ignored the URGENT! marked on the material given to him by Sullivan. Which one was the "nut?"

Osama's Revenge: THE NEXT 9/11: What the Media and the Government Haven't Told You Hardcover – 261 pages

Does Osama bin Laden have nuclear weapons and other weapons of mass destruction? Is so, where are they? Are they in the hands of al Qaeda sleeper cells in the United States? Should Americans be bracing for a nuclear attack?

Former consultant for the FBI an organized crime and international terrorism and a seasoned investigative reporter, Paul L. Williams reveals the potential for nuclear terrorism on US soil in this shocking expose. Based on the findings of US, Israeli, Pakistani, and British intelligence, Williams describes how the theft of tactical nuclear weapons from Russian arsenals have in all likelihood made their way to al Qaeda cells throughout the United States in preparation for the next terrorist attack.

Williams presents clear evidence showing that, in the chaos following the breakup of the Soviet Union, the Chechen Mafia got its hands on portable Russian nuclear weapons. Between 1996 and 2001, mafia members negotiated the sale of twenty nuclear "suitcase bombs" to representatives of Osama bin Laden. Far worse than so-called "dirty bombs," each suitcase bomb is capable of killing millions of Americans while exposing millions more to deadly radioactive fallout. According to Williams, reliable sources indicate that these bombs may already be in the possession of al Qaeda operatives in such major cities as New York, Washington, Miami, Chicago, Las Vegas, Houston, and Los Angeles. In addition, bin Laden has recruited former Soviet scientists and technicians to maintain these weapons and recharge their nuclear cores so that they may be deployed immediately on his command. In 2001 he issued a statement boasting of his intent to have America experience a "Hiroshima."

Also included in the book are bin Laden's "Letters to America" and his "Declaration of War against the Americans Occupying the Land of the Two Holy Places," as well as the World Islamic Statement declaring "Jihad against Jews and Crusaders." These crucial documents highlight the rationale behind and the depth of bin Laden's hatred for the United States. Moreover, Williams documents that Osama has the international network of embedded terrorists to carry out his threats.

Although the media have reported on some of these threatening developments and government insiders have acknowledged the threat of nuclear attack, until now no one has put all the pieces together in a coherent, nonsense way. Williams makes a persuasive case that bin Laden and his deputies have the motive and the means and are just waiting for the opportunity to launch an apocalyptic attack on the "Great Satan" of America.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: attackamerica; bodanisback; bogdan; bogdanishere; bookreview; jihadinamerica; majoruscities; nukebombs; osamasrevenge; paullwilliams; paulwilliams; russiantechs; targets; twentysuitcases; warnings
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 last
To: Lady GOP

Everything I have learned about suitcase nukes (and Walmart), I have learned here on FR.

1) They exist
2) They probably work only as dirty bombs due to maintenance considerations
3) Al-Quaida may have them in the US and EU
4) They are a good terrorist weapon, whether used or not


81 posted on 07/17/2004 8:03:21 AM PDT by Cold Heart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Cold Heart

82 posted on 07/17/2004 8:54:03 AM PDT by Lady GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: OSHA

Dear Great America friend what is limp.


83 posted on 07/17/2004 9:10:53 AM PDT by anonymoussierra (Hello to great America country Grupa Reagowania Operacyjno Mobilnego)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

placemark.


84 posted on 07/17/2004 9:12:36 AM PDT by little jeremiah ("You're possibly the most ignorant, belligerent, and loathesome poster on FR currently." - tdadams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus; dighton; Thinkin' Gal; Jackie-O
Catch of the year.

Catch kinda ripe. Bogdan supposed to sleep still with fishes.

85 posted on 07/18/2004 6:40:31 PM PDT by hellinahandcart (mrs. sauropod)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: aculeus; dighton; Thinkin' Gal; Jackie-O
Catch of the year.

Catch kinda ripe. Bogdan supposed to sleep still with fishes.

86 posted on 07/18/2004 6:40:36 PM PDT by hellinahandcart (mrs. sauropod)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: ladtx

I think that if they had them they would have used them first. Why would they pull off a much smaller attack like 9/11 which would allow us to regroup, identify the enemy and destroy them instead of killing as many of us as possible when they were not being watched?

And is it possible that AQ has somehow acquired these WMDs since 9/11? I think that it is not likely given the hightened state of surveillance since 9/11. Let's just hope that our guys keep killing those animals until they are all gone and can do us no more harm.


87 posted on 07/18/2004 6:47:21 PM PDT by Constitutional Patriot (George W. Bush is a leader and John Kerry is not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Brad Cloven

We got problems, no doubt, but Russian Suitcase Nukes are probably not worth losing sleep over. I would worry about the Iranians.

I would also worry about the Pakistanis who seem to have a track record of assisting others with nuclear technology, i.e., Iran, Libya, and North Korea. Based on personal experience, I have found the Paks to be the most devout and radical Islamicists in the world. They have the knowledge and fissile material to assist AQ in maintaining or rejuvenating suitcase nukes.

88 posted on 07/18/2004 6:47:47 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

bump


89 posted on 07/13/2005 4:11:27 PM PDT by kimosabe31
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kimosabe31; Fred Nerks; Stopislamnow; backhoe; Eastbound; Marauder; tuffydoodle; Seaplaner; ...
Thanks for reviving one of my year old posts! I'm reading it now with renewed interest. I post so many items that I don't keep track of them (don't keep a list).

Thanks very much. This one really should be recycled, and I appreciate your unearthing it. How did you find such a "golden oldie?"

Char :)

90 posted on 07/13/2005 5:14:45 PM PDT by CHARLITE (I propose a co-Clinton team as permanent reps to Pyonyang, w/out possibility of repatriation....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

I came to the party late, but read every post....

is #16 supposed to be a joke?


91 posted on 07/13/2005 5:40:16 PM PDT by bitt ('We will all soon reap what the ignorant are now sowing.' Victor Davis Hanson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

Char...Michael Savage interviewed Paul Williams today...the first I heard of him and his thesis. So I did a freerepublic search hoping to find additional information and came up with your post.


92 posted on 07/13/2005 5:42:16 PM PDT by kimosabe31
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: ladtx

He doesn't need nukes yet. What would attacking us again do for him? He's recruiting more than he ever has before, US troops are out of Saudi Arabia, Israel is pulling out of some settlements, and he's free. What would setting off a nuclear bomb do for him?


93 posted on 07/13/2005 5:45:29 PM PDT by eddie65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bitt
"I came to the party late." How KEY YEWT! I was glad to see this one from summer of '04!

Thanks, bitt!

Char :)

94 posted on 07/13/2005 5:48:58 PM PDT by CHARLITE (I propose a co-Clinton team as permanent reps to Pyonyang, w/out possibility of repatriation....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: kimosabe31

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1442391/posts


95 posted on 07/13/2005 5:59:11 PM PDT by bitt ('We will all soon reap what the ignorant are now sowing.' Victor Davis Hanson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: backhoe

Paul Williams discussed last year. He was interviewed on Savage last night and claim he's meeting with Tancredo today.


96 posted on 07/14/2005 4:41:02 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March (<<< Ad Campaign for Durbin the Turban in profile)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson