Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Revised Policy Treats Obesity Under Medicare
Yahoo! News ^ | Jul 16 04 | By Richard Simon and Carla Rivera Times Staff Writers

Posted on 07/16/2004 9:03:04 AM PDT by Serb5150

Revised Policy Treats Obesity Under Medicare

By Richard Simon and Carla Rivera Times Staff Writers

WASHINGTON — Federal officials Thursday announced a new policy on obesity that could make weight-loss treatments eligible for Medicare coverage.

"Obesity is a critical public health problem in our country that causes millions of Americans to suffer unnecessary health problems and to die prematurely," Tommy G. Thompson, secretary of Health and Human Services (news - web sites), said at a Senate subcommittee hearing where he announced that Medicare officials were removing the statement that "obesity itself cannot be considered an illness" from the Medicare manual.

Under the new policy, Medicare beneficiaries would be able to obtain coverage for treatments — such as gastric bypass surgery — if "scientific and medical evidence demonstrate their effectiveness in improving Medicare beneficiaries' health," the department said in a statement.

The new policy comes as obesity has generated fresh concern on Capitol Hill, triggering legislation — with titles such as the Healthy Lifestyles Act and the Obesity Prevention Act — designed to reduce the problem.

Poor diet and physical inactivity, two major contributors to obesity, are closing in on tobacco use as the leading preventable causes of death in the United States, according to a report in March in the Journal of the American Medical Assn.

According to the National Institutes of Health (news - web sites), nearly two-thirds of Americans are classified as overweight (with a body mass index over 25) or obese (with a body mass index over 30). Body mass index is a measure of body fat based on height and weight.

Studies have shown that obese people are at high risk for diabetes, hypertension, sleep apnea, some cancers and other life-threatening conditions.

"Treating obesity-related illnesses and complications adds billions of dollars to the nation's healthcare costs," Thompson told the Senate Appropriations subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services and Education. "With this new policy, Medicare will be able to review scientific evidence in order to determine which interventions improve health outcomes for seniors and disabled Americans who are obese and its many associated medical conditions."

Medicare covers medically necessary services for illness and injury for 41 million senior and disabled Americans.

The wording that obesity was not an illness could have barred Medicare from covering treatments for diseases related to obesity, the Department of Health and Human Services (news - web sites) said.

While treatment for some illnesses that can cause obesity, such as Cushing's disease and hypothyroidism, have been covered by Medicare, programs such as gastric bypass surgery — which can cost upward of $30,000 — have not.

"From the standpoint of Medicare coverage and the health of our beneficiaries, the question isn't whether obesity is a disease or a risk factor," said Mark McClellan, administrator of the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. "What matters is whether there's scientific evidence that an obesity-related medical treatment improves health.

"The medical science will now determine whether we provide coverage for the treatments that reduce complications and improve quality of life for the millions of Medicare beneficiaries who are obese," he said.

The new policy does not affect the existing Medicare coverage of treatments of diseases resulting in or made worse by obesity, in particular surgical treatments for morbidly obese individuals, the department said in a statement.

A joint study by the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (news - web sites) and the North Carolina research group RTI, published in January in the journal Obesity Research, found that Medicaid and Medicare spent $75 billion last year on obesity-related illnesses. In a report issued last year, U.S. Surgeon Gen. Richard Carmona said that the nation spent $177 billion on obesity-related health costs in 2000.

One key issue will be how the government determines which types of treatments will be reimbursed under the new policy, said James Hill, director of the Center for Human Nutrition at the University of Colorado Health Science Center.

"From what I've read, it will be programs with proven effectiveness, and that's a real key," Hill said. "Everybody and his brother claims to be able to treat obesity, and I would hope that there will be some way to hold programs accountable. From a research point of view, hopefully it will stimulate programs to begin collecting data."

In its revised policy, the department did not specifically define obesity as a disease, although advocates for the obese saw the action as moving in that direction.

Dr. Richard Atkinson, president of the American Obesity Assn., praised the policy change, declaring in a statement: "The decision by Medicare recognizes that obesity is not simply a cosmetic issue. It is a disease in its own right. In fact, obesity is the most prevalent, fatal, chronic disease of the 21st century. This decision will open the door not only for better insurance coverage but more medical research and increased education on obesity at the nation's medical and other health schools."

According to the association, a Washington advocacy and education organization, 37% of the Medicare population is overweight and 18% obese. From 1991 to 1998, the prevalence of obesity among people age 60 to 69 increased 45%, the association said.

Some public health experts said the policy shift legitimized their long-held view that obesity was a discrete and legitimate disease.

"This is very exciting, really meaningful and long overdue," said Dr. Peter Pressman, an obesity specialist at the University of Southern California. "This new policy opens up coverage for interventions — everything from medical and nutritional counseling, psychotherapy and bariatric surgery — for those who are obese. But it also makes Medicare receptive to reviewing scientific evidence to help us in the field determine which therapies are effective."

But Pressman said the new policy should also serve as a wake-up call for physicians.

"I'm hoping it will in effect coerce us as a profession to be more responsible about considering clinical nutrition and obesity as an expanding component of our formal education," he said.

Now that Medicare has changed its policy, consumers will be waiting for private insurers to decide whether to follow suit. In recent months, many companies have restricted coverage for expensive procedures.

Michael Chee, a spokesman for Blue Cross of California, said his company provided the sort of obesity coverage anticipated by Medicare, and the announcement would not have any effect on the company's policies.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2004; 229
Sorry if this has already been posted, searched for it and came up with nothing.
1 posted on 07/16/2004 9:03:05 AM PDT by Serb5150
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Serb5150

Please! No pictures on this thread.


2 posted on 07/16/2004 9:04:35 AM PDT by Tall_Texan (Ronald Reagan - Greatest President of the 20th Century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Serb5150

Unreal.

I'll bet this will add a few hundred billion dollars more the the medicare drug entitlement.


morons.


3 posted on 07/16/2004 9:05:10 AM PDT by WhiteGuy (Congress shall make no law... abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhiteGuy
"Obesity is a critical public health problem in our country that causes millions of Americans to suffer unnecessary health problems and to die prematurely,"

But but..I heard this morning on WBZ (Boston Globe/NYT/Pravda) That PEOPLE ARE STARVING IN THIS COUNTRY!

So....Which is it?

4 posted on 07/16/2004 9:10:47 AM PDT by Gorzaloon (Ah, the days of the Kerry Dancing! Every day a different tune!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: WhiteGuy

Next we'll have to subsidize treatment of thumb sucking, oversleeping trauma, workatosis (fear of work)and conscriptitus (fear of the draft).


5 posted on 07/16/2004 9:14:16 AM PDT by Uncle George
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: WhiteGuy
It's truly amazing, isn't it? I don't care what the medical association says, obesity is caused by choice, not a medical condition.
6 posted on 07/16/2004 9:15:39 AM PDT by Serb5150 (God Bless Ronald Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Gorzaloon

This might just turn into "Free Y Memberships" prescribed by your doctor...Like the hot tubs for arthritis.


7 posted on 07/16/2004 9:15:56 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Serb5150

The bankruptcy of America just picked up pace. This will cost MORE than the prescription drug program.


8 posted on 07/16/2004 9:16:01 AM PDT by Taliesan (fiction police)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Serb5150

"Poor diet and physical inactivity, two major contributors to obesity." Translation: Laziness and lack of self discipline is a disease.

This is plain and simple insanity.


9 posted on 07/16/2004 9:30:27 AM PDT by Integrityrocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Serb5150

I really feel bad for the kids in the all this. If the adults are telling kids that they have a disease this will never get better. Parents need to stop getting drive-thru, buckets of chicken, kick the crappy food out of school and cut the Soda intake.

By telling children they are the way they are for reasons they cannot control is just adding more narcissistic people into voting population. Seems like everyday the theory of “Internal Locus of Control” is falling farther and farther from memory. Let alone daily thought.


10 posted on 07/16/2004 9:39:55 AM PDT by ZeonZaku
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZeonZaku

I keep seeing the fat police busting in like the Ben Stiller fitness jerk in "Heavyweights".


11 posted on 07/16/2004 10:07:03 AM PDT by Alcibiades (Put a Hollywood type out of work --- turn off the TV and go fishin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ZeonZaku

If this is a 'disease', how come we never see obese people in Cambodia? Or Ethiopia? Surely this is a disease that knows no boundaries, right?


12 posted on 07/16/2004 10:24:14 AM PDT by Serb5150 (God Bless Ronald Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Serb5150

Another sad step in the march towards socialized medicine. We will cover everything, mandate a cap for those who can't afford the coverage and then sue the doctors into the poor house to make up the difference. For the first time in my life I actually envy Canada. They are in the process of fixing their system. The very system we seem to be adopting here.


13 posted on 07/16/2004 11:35:50 AM PDT by willyd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Serb5150
The very worst consequece of this disasterous policy is the social engineering and loss of liberty that will surely follow.

Witness the current "click it or ticket" campaign, and road blocks (yes, ROAD BLOCKS!) used to enforce seatbelt laws. These invasive and paternalistic laws are 100% a result of the socialist nature of who pays for accident costs.

Now think of the scale and invasiveness of laws needed to regulate your body weight! Literally everything you eat, and most all your activities will become targets.

Only an independent people can retain their liberty. Rely on the state and you'll become a ward of the state.

14 posted on 07/16/2004 11:49:14 AM PDT by freeeee ("Owning" property in the US just means you have one less landlord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: willyd

What angers me the most is that the people qualifying as obese are now essentially being rewarded for their irresponsible actions. Naturally, this reward comes out of our pockets.


15 posted on 07/16/2004 11:55:47 AM PDT by Serb5150 (God Bless Ronald Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ZeonZaku
This story isn't about children; it's about old people over 65. There are lots of fat old people who weren't fat as children or young people. Prevention would have been nice, but the horse already escaped the barn, and now we deal with the consequences.

Nor is all overweight in the elderly due to sloth and gluttony; there are medical conditions that cause it. Also, it's unclear if it's really good for many older people (especially women) to try and lose weight in their 70s, as it seems to cause osteoporosis in older women.

16 posted on 07/16/2004 12:09:26 PM PDT by valkyrieanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: valkyrieanne
Wow! Of course obesity is a medical problem! It may have a behavioral component, but so does breaking your neck while skiing, boating, or engaging in other risky behaviors. The fact is, many diseases have a behavioral component, including heart disease unrelated to obesity, diabetes, certain cancers, etc. Go to a rehab center and you'll find people who are in bed or in a wheelchair for life because they drove too fast; you'll see people being treated aggressively for all kinds of behavior-related activities. Elsewhere you'll find people being treated because they took too many drugs or drank too much, others because they self-inflicted wounds, tried to commit suicide, or got injured while earning money by being employed in a risky job (police, nurses, construction workers, firefighters... they all have choices too).
What would the naysayers do, steal health care benefits from all of these people? That is precisely what has happened in the case of obesity; insurance companies have collected hundreds of millions of dollars, BILLLIONS OF DOLLARS in premiums, and then they have sorted out those people that are less valued, more subject to public scorn and shame and have denied them the health care opportunities they paid for.
The ruling comes through Medicare, but ultimately it serves to force insurance companies to allow treatment for weight loss before somebody is 30... 50... 100% or more over the norm of weight for their body. And not all of these people are "lazy," "bored," "stupid," and selfish in the way they are typically characterized in the responses I read thus far.
17 posted on 07/19/2004 10:41:27 PM PDT by TillyCimer (Good News: Jesus Christ will come back one day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Serb5150

Since we don't see breast cancer in those country's either we should let people who get breast cancer die.


18 posted on 09/01/2004 3:48:01 PM PDT by Kenhi (Please understand the issue before you comment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson