Posted on 07/15/2004 5:40:29 PM PDT by wagglebee
On Wednesday afternoon the United States Senate voted against moving forward on a proposed amendment which would have added to the constitution these words, “Marriage in the United States shall consist only of the union of a man and a woman.”
Some Americans are celebrating this as a triumph of tolerance while others are mourning it as the defeat of decency. However, I suspect that many Americans, whose basic credo is live-and-let-live, are ignoring it entirely.
It is to these readers, who regard the Senate vote as largely irrelevant in their lives, that I address myself.
The majority of us live our lives confronting challenges that demand that we make decisions many times each day. Should I invest this unexpected windfall or spend it on a long-awaited necessity? Should we send our children to private or public school? Should I remain in my job or switch careers? Should I marry the person I have been seeing or wait for someone else? Should I do my homework or go swimming?
Many of these decisions would be easy if we didn’t all live in a state of exquisite tension, constantly suspended between two opposing poles. Almost every decision forces us to choose between the two poles, each pulling us in a different direction.
Sometimes the two poles appear dressed as duty and pleasure. Other times they wear the costumes of our short-term interests versus our long-term interests. Often, in our own minds and for our own emotional convenience, we interpret the two conflicting tugs to be good and evil. However, for many of us, that distinction usually reflects nothing but our own pre-existing inclinations.
Often our basic two choices masquerade as continuity and change. For instance, do I divorce my spouse or remain in a flawed marriage? We all feel a pull to keep doing what we have been doing, because continuity is comfortable and change can be terrifying. On the other hand, we are also attracted by change with all its promise of excitement, novelty and perhaps improvement.
For many years now American public policy seems to have been guided by the false credo that instead of continuity, change is always the best path. To be sure, the abolition of slavery and the outlawing of child labor were overdue and good changes, but many public policy decisions have also caused dreadful changes.
Things don’t just happen. Many specific decisions, each made with only good intentions, gradually made life in these United States indescribably more squalid, more expensive, and more dangerous than it was only, say, about 50 years ago.
Violent and salacious lyrics that would have made a hardened convict blush back then now pound remorselessly through the earphones of almost every suburban teenager.
Do you recall how, in the 1950s, an enviable middle-class lifestyle could be maintained for a family by the earnings of one worker?
Back then, women could walk safely at any time of the day or night through the parks of any major city in the country.
We embraced the public policies that brought about these terrible changes. People like you and me failed to remember that life involves reconciling continuity and change, not just thoughtlessly accepting change.
Public policy decisions do have consequences in our lives. You may not feel the impact of a bill passing Congress until years have elapsed, but feel it you will. Eventually it will impact your children, your finances, and most other aspects of your life; and not necessarily for the better.
Whether you personally see the two poles as continuity and change, duty and pleasure, or present and future, they are alluded to by the opening words of the Torah: "In the beginning God created heaven and earth."
Rather than viewing this sentence as a cosmological insight into Big Bang theory, ancient Jewish wisdom reveals it to be a fundamental insight into the most basic dilemma of human existence: the need to choose between heaven and earth. Virtually every difficult choice resolves itself in terms of this dilemma — at every confusing crossroad, in the face of two choices, reality restricts our footsteps to only one path. The trick is to identify the real nature of the two paths regardless of what the signposts may say.
Clearly, the real nature of the two paths is hinted at by the terms heaven and earth, but what in our real lives do heaven and earth represent? Within no more than 20words, the biblical text provides a hint: The choice is light and darkness. For those of us still unsure, a later verse spells it out: "I have placed life and death before you, blessing and curse, therefore choose life so that you and your children should live."
Back in 1973, because people like you and me considered public policy to be irrelevant to our lives, and because some of us were seduced by the propaganda of choice and freedom, the country chose death. It took many years, but today in most states, your teenage daughter can get an abortion without your knowledge or consent.
At its deepest level, the existential choice we each confront many times each day is a choice between heaven and earth, a choice between eternity and mortality, and, yes, ultimately a choice between life and death.
The question we now ought to ask ourselves is whether publicly sanctioned homosexual marriage corresponds to the path of life or that of death. Can anyone really be sure of the impact this legislation would have upon the essence of all our lives a few years down the road?
To those who ignore the public debate on homosexual marriage and to those who feel it is irrelevant in their lives and to those who advertise their tolerance by singing "live-and-let-live," I say the time has come to choose continuity over change. The time has come to choose heaven over earth, and, yes, life over death.
The left will never understand that the easy and "non-controversial" thing to do is quite often the worst thing we can do.
The left will never acknowledge one very simple principle: The truth is true even if nobody believes it, and a lie is a lie even if everybody believes it.
I can sympathise with the Rabbi's exasperation.
This debate actually had 3 poles. There are those who do not believe in "gay marriage" but nevertheless do not see it as a matter for the Federal government to deal with. There are people who are very much concerned with judicial activism, but see it as a bigger threat to the Constitution, and state's rights, and democracy ... than to marriage per se.
Liberalism is by definition based on lies. They cannot choose the truth so they must of necessity live in their own make-believe world.
there's a reason He created Adam and Eve
and not Adam and Steve....
Actually, quite a few do.
Unfortunatly, this hasn't (yet, at least) become a truly galvanizing issue for conservatives. It almost seems the Republicans set up the senate vote to fail just to put this issue on the back burner until after the election.
Shame, since it has the potential to become a real "rallying point" for the Republican cause !
Yes, but on the other hand John Kerry and John Edwards look so "happy" to be together, who could deny them the life they choose together./sarcasm off
It almost seems the Republicans set up the senate vote to fail just to put this issue on the back burner until after the election.
Unfortunately, this is true, as well as several other issues that may polarize potential voters. I hope and pray that GW's administration has some major plans for addressing some of these issues immediately after the election. If ignored, our nation may have some serious problems.
Not to nitpick, but while rape statistics in the US are notoriously unreliable prior to the 1970s this was certainly not the case in the white blue-collar community where I grew up in the 1950s and early 60s.
It WAS the case in NYC. People often walked late at night in Central Park and they even, on hot nights, would sleep there.
The shops, even "uptown", didn't have those steel shutters that they ALL have now. Dynamite was left on the worksites at night in sheds boldly marked "DANGER,DYNAMITE! People rode the Subway at all hours.
Look at old pictures and News footage of the city from the pre-fifties long enough, and what are wild incongruities today will begin to appear.
"However, I suspect that many Americans, whose basic credo is live-and-let-live, are ignoring it entirely."
And people wonder what is wrong with our country...
Apathy breeds tyranny, in this case judicial tyranny.
And people wonder what is wrong with our country...
And it will get worse if the apathy continues. Next, the Man/Boy alliance will be like the Rotary club etc etc. We gotta stop it somewhere.
I believe it is too late to start it. Our reluctance to stand up to these deviants has paid off to their advantage. Major changes in this country will only come with major action, and I don't mean legislative action.
The bottom line is this-misuse of the courts has reversed the normal flow of public policy. There is no majority ANYWHERE for pretend "marriages". If the Constitution had to be amended to allow it, there would not be 50 votes in the House, or 20 votes in the Senate.
Now, because of the arrogance of the courts, the situation is reversed, so that WE have to amend the Constitution to forbid what is already forbidden by statute in all 50 states and by Federal law.
This is a standard which can never be met.
I believe it was Andrew Jackson who said (and I apologize I cannot remember the exact quote, but this is close), "the Supreme Court has made their decision, now let's see them enforce it."
I believe it is too late to start it. Our reluctance to stand up to these deviants has paid off to their advantage. Major changes in this country will only come with major action, and I don't mean legislative action.
Sadly, it will lead to intollerance and ultimately civil war in this country at some point. Sad, but it almost seems inevitable.
The left believes that if someone is harmed, it is better that they maximize the damage so as to maximize the blame, rather than mitigate damages and risk not having anything for which to blame anyone.
The left believes that if someone is harmed, it is better that they maximize the damage so as to maximize the blame, rather than mitigate damages and risk not having anything for which to blame anyone.
Could you imagine having a mind like that. If I woke up tomorrow and discovered I was a lefty, think I'd opt for the kool-aid.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.