Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mark Steyn: I still think Bush will win
The Spectator (U.K.) ^ | 07/17/04 | Mark Steyn

Posted on 07/15/2004 6:16:26 AM PDT by Pokey78

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-111 next last

1 posted on 07/15/2004 6:16:27 AM PDT by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Howlin; riley1992; Miss Marple; deport; Dane; sinkspur; steve; kattracks; JohnHuang2; ...

2 posted on 07/15/2004 6:17:32 AM PDT by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
"He’s happy on his little hamster wheel, going round and round and getting nowhere, occasionally pausing to chew his nuts."

I don't know why ... well, yes, I do (it's because I've got a dirty mind) ... but this is the funniest line in the whole article. I can just visualize John F'ing Kerry on this giant hamster wheel, running for all he's worth, and then stopping to chew on his ****

3 posted on 07/15/2004 6:23:18 AM PDT by BlueLancer (Der Elite Møøsënspåånkængrüppen ØberKømmändø (EMØØK))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78

This one immediately goes to the top of the Steyn list - very well said on all counts.


4 posted on 07/15/2004 6:23:50 AM PDT by TexasNative2000 (When it's all said and done, someone starts another conversation.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
The media, said Evan Thomas, assistant managing editor of Newsweek, in a unusual moment of candour the other day, ‘wants Kerry to win’ and so ‘they’re going to portray Kerry and Edwards as being young and dynamic and optimistic ...

And the New York Times is worried about bias at Fox. Nothing Fox is accused of doing even comes close to that bias. Newsweek is boldly admitting their magazine is just propaganda for Kerry.

5 posted on 07/15/2004 6:24:13 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78

Larry Sabito was on Fox this morning. Very depressing. He thinks Bush has to lose Cheney for another VP. He says for Bush this election is tied at best. Now I have some questions about this. Isn't Kerry supposed to be receiving his Edwards bounce now? Tied at best? On the other hand, we hear this story about the indifferent black voter base every election, and every election they vote in huge numbers for Democrats. Sabito also says Bush is losing in Pennsylvania and Florida right now...and that the electoral map looks just like four years ago, except that Bush has to get Florida back, and has a chance at Pennsylvania and Wisconsin this time. Anybody have any substantively good news out there? Has this country moved very far to the left? It's so scary.


6 posted on 07/15/2004 6:28:12 AM PDT by rushmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Fabulous: Should be read into the record at the Republican Convention.

But the other reason I’d bet on Bush is more basic: he tends not to lose.

This is what the kool-aid drinkers refuse to see.

7 posted on 07/15/2004 6:28:57 AM PDT by maica (Hitlary says; "We are going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlueLancer

I don't normally consider myself to have a dirty mind, but that line cracked me up too.


8 posted on 07/15/2004 6:29:25 AM PDT by texasflower (in the event of the rapture.......the Bush White House will be unmanned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78

Botoxicated Brahmin Bloviator from Massachusetts. LOL, I think I'll be using that one with my democratic friends!


9 posted on 07/15/2004 6:31:45 AM PDT by EmilyGeiger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
But to say that you believe in voting against what you believe because you don’t believe in believing in your beliefs is as close as you can get to admitting that the flip-flop perception is true: you stand for nothing; there’s no there there.

Another Steyn classic.

This guy needs to get out more. He's fantastic.

10 posted on 07/15/2004 6:31:55 AM PDT by sinkspur (There's no problem on the inside of a kid that the outside of a dog can't cure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
The 2000 census brought about, yet again, a further draining of electoral muscle from the Democrat north-east to the Republican south and west. This means that even if Bush won only the states he won last time round, instead of a squeaker, he'd beat Kerry by 278 electoral college votes to 260.

An excellent observation. I haven't seen this pointed out anywhere else.

11 posted on 07/15/2004 6:32:37 AM PDT by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78

I don't think it is possible to split Maine's electoral votes evenly--either they will split 3-1 or 4-0, depending on who gets more votes in each Congressional district. It isn't possible to lose in both districts and still have a statewide popular plurality, unless they have some really fuzzy math involved.


12 posted on 07/15/2004 6:33:10 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
The only thing Thomas got wrong was that 15-point bounce. There was no discernible Edwards bounce outside his hair.

That wasn't a bounce. That was a flounce of the Breck girl's hair.

13 posted on 07/15/2004 6:33:54 AM PDT by dennisw (Once is Happenstance. Twice is Coincidence. The third time is Enemy action. - Ian Fleming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
...it’s about American resolve in dangerous times, Kerry and Edwards look way out of their league.

Bingo. This is the main issue of the election. Kerry/Edwards call American resolve arrogance and they minimize dangerous times simply because they have no new ideas. Like Clinton's foreign policy team, Kerry/Edwards will focus on sending little boys back to Cuba and empty treaty cerimonies as an opiate for the simple minded.

14 posted on 07/15/2004 6:35:52 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
But to say that you believe in voting against what you believe because you don’t believe in believing in your beliefs is as close as you can get to admitting that the flip-flop perception is true: you stand for nothing; there’s no there there.

I almost pity the Dems-not having a Mark Steyn.

Almost.

15 posted on 07/15/2004 6:36:33 AM PDT by 91B (God made man, Sam Colt made men equal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole; Willie Green; XBob
A DNC water-carrier ping!
16 posted on 07/15/2004 6:38:00 AM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlueLancer
I don't know why ... well, yes, I do (it's because I've got a dirty mind) ... but this is the funniest line in the whole article.

I got to that line and had to scroll down to see if anybody had highlighted it yet.

17 posted on 07/15/2004 6:39:28 AM PDT by TheyConvictedOglethorpe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78

"Like a caged hamster,"

Can't stop laughing.


18 posted on 07/15/2004 6:40:39 AM PDT by bad company ((<a href="http://www.michaelmoore.com" target="_blank">Hatriotism))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Pure gold...

"This is a first: a candidate who boasts that his conscience is at odds with his voting record. If you believe that abortion is the taking of a life, you vote against it. If you lose the vote, then you say, well, I personally believe life begins at conception, but I respect the will of the legislature, blah blah. But to say that you believe in voting against what you believe because you don’t believe in believing in your beliefs is as close as you can get to admitting that the flip-flop perception is true: you stand for nothing; there’s no there there."

19 posted on 07/15/2004 6:43:49 AM PDT by new cruelty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
He’s happy on his little hamster wheel, going round and round and getting nowhere, occasionally pausing to chew his nuts.

I thought that was Teresa's job.

he doesn’t believe he has the right to inflict his deeply held personal beliefs on Jacques Chirac, or Gerhard Schröder, or whoever the Belgian guy is.

LOL. Take that, Belgium!

20 posted on 07/15/2004 6:46:04 AM PDT by Sloth (We have to support RINOs like Specter; their states are too liberal to elect someone like Santorum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-111 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson