Skip to comments.
Mark Steyn: I still think Bush will win
The Spectator (U.K.) ^
| 07/17/04
| Mark Steyn
Posted on 07/15/2004 6:16:26 AM PDT by Pokey78
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-111 next last
1
posted on
07/15/2004 6:16:27 AM PDT
by
Pokey78
To: Howlin; riley1992; Miss Marple; deport; Dane; sinkspur; steve; kattracks; JohnHuang2; ...
2
posted on
07/15/2004 6:17:32 AM PDT
by
Pokey78
To: Pokey78
"Hes happy on his little hamster wheel, going round and round and getting nowhere, occasionally pausing to chew his nuts."I don't know why ... well, yes, I do (it's because I've got a dirty mind) ... but this is the funniest line in the whole article. I can just visualize John F'ing Kerry on this giant hamster wheel, running for all he's worth, and then stopping to chew on his ****
3
posted on
07/15/2004 6:23:18 AM PDT
by
BlueLancer
(Der Elite Møøsënspåånkængrüppen ØberKømmändø (EMØØK))
To: Pokey78
This one immediately goes to the top of the Steyn list - very well said on all counts.
4
posted on
07/15/2004 6:23:50 AM PDT
by
TexasNative2000
(When it's all said and done, someone starts another conversation.......)
To: Pokey78
The media, said Evan Thomas, assistant managing editor of Newsweek, in a unusual moment of candour the other day, wants Kerry to win and so theyre going to portray Kerry and Edwards as being young and dynamic and optimistic ... And the New York Times is worried about bias at Fox. Nothing Fox is accused of doing even comes close to that bias. Newsweek is boldly admitting their magazine is just propaganda for Kerry.
To: Pokey78
Larry Sabito was on Fox this morning. Very depressing. He thinks Bush has to lose Cheney for another VP. He says for Bush this election is tied at best. Now I have some questions about this. Isn't Kerry supposed to be receiving his Edwards bounce now? Tied at best? On the other hand, we hear this story about the indifferent black voter base every election, and every election they vote in huge numbers for Democrats. Sabito also says Bush is losing in Pennsylvania and Florida right now...and that the electoral map looks just like four years ago, except that Bush has to get Florida back, and has a chance at Pennsylvania and Wisconsin this time. Anybody have any substantively good news out there? Has this country moved very far to the left? It's so scary.
6
posted on
07/15/2004 6:28:12 AM PDT
by
rushmom
To: Pokey78
Fabulous: Should be read into the record at the Republican Convention.
But the other reason Id bet on Bush is more basic: he tends not to lose.
This is what the kool-aid drinkers refuse to see.
7
posted on
07/15/2004 6:28:57 AM PDT
by
maica
(Hitlary says; "We are going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good"...)
To: BlueLancer
I don't normally consider myself to have a dirty mind, but that line cracked me up too.
8
posted on
07/15/2004 6:29:25 AM PDT
by
texasflower
(in the event of the rapture.......the Bush White House will be unmanned)
To: Pokey78
Botoxicated Brahmin Bloviator from Massachusetts. LOL, I think I'll be using that one with my democratic friends!
To: Pokey78
But to say that you believe in voting against what you believe because you dont believe in believing in your beliefs is as close as you can get to admitting that the flip-flop perception is true: you stand for nothing; theres no there there. Another Steyn classic.
This guy needs to get out more. He's fantastic.
10
posted on
07/15/2004 6:31:55 AM PDT
by
sinkspur
(There's no problem on the inside of a kid that the outside of a dog can't cure.)
To: Pokey78
The 2000 census brought about, yet again, a further draining of electoral muscle from the Democrat north-east to the Republican south and west. This means that even if Bush won only the states he won last time round, instead of a squeaker, he'd beat Kerry by 278 electoral college votes to 260. An excellent observation. I haven't seen this pointed out anywhere else.
11
posted on
07/15/2004 6:32:37 AM PDT
by
malakhi
To: Pokey78
I don't think it is possible to split Maine's electoral votes evenly--either they will split 3-1 or 4-0, depending on who gets more votes in each Congressional district. It isn't possible to lose in both districts and still have a statewide popular plurality, unless they have some really fuzzy math involved.
To: Pokey78
The only thing Thomas got wrong was that 15-point bounce. There was no discernible Edwards bounce outside his hair.That wasn't a bounce. That was a flounce of the Breck girl's hair.
13
posted on
07/15/2004 6:33:54 AM PDT
by
dennisw
(Once is Happenstance. Twice is Coincidence. The third time is Enemy action. - Ian Fleming)
To: Pokey78
...its about American resolve in dangerous times, Kerry and Edwards look way out of their league. Bingo. This is the main issue of the election. Kerry/Edwards call American resolve arrogance and they minimize dangerous times simply because they have no new ideas. Like Clinton's foreign policy team, Kerry/Edwards will focus on sending little boys back to Cuba and empty treaty cerimonies as an opiate for the simple minded.
14
posted on
07/15/2004 6:35:52 AM PDT
by
rhombus
To: Pokey78
But to say that you believe in voting against what you believe because you dont believe in believing in your beliefs is as close as you can get to admitting that the flip-flop perception is true: you stand for nothing; theres no there there.I almost pity the Dems-not having a Mark Steyn.
Almost.
15
posted on
07/15/2004 6:36:33 AM PDT
by
91B
(God made man, Sam Colt made men equal.)
To: A. Pole; Willie Green; XBob
A few months ago the Democrats were jeering about the Bush recession. Then the recession ended. So they started jeering about the jobless recovery. Then the jobs kicked in. So now theyre moaning that the jobs dont pay enough. Get the feeling this whole economy thing just isnt going anywhere for them?
A DNC water-carrier ping!
To: BlueLancer
I don't know why ... well, yes, I do (it's because I've got a dirty mind) ... but this is the funniest line in the whole article. I got to that line and had to scroll down to see if anybody had highlighted it yet.
To: Pokey78
"Like a caged hamster,"
Can't stop laughing.
18
posted on
07/15/2004 6:40:39 AM PDT
by
bad company
((<a href="http://www.michaelmoore.com" target="_blank">Hatriotism))
To: Pokey78
Pure gold...
"This is a first: a candidate who boasts that his conscience is at odds with his voting record. If you believe that abortion is the taking of a life, you vote against it. If you lose the vote, then you say, well, I personally believe life begins at conception, but I respect the will of the legislature, blah blah. But to say that you believe in voting against what you believe because you dont believe in believing in your beliefs is as close as you can get to admitting that the flip-flop perception is true: you stand for nothing; theres no there there."
To: Pokey78
Hes happy on his little hamster wheel, going round and round and getting nowhere, occasionally pausing to chew his nuts. I thought that was Teresa's job.
he doesnt believe he has the right to inflict his deeply held personal beliefs on Jacques Chirac, or Gerhard Schröder, or whoever the Belgian guy is.
LOL. Take that, Belgium!
20
posted on
07/15/2004 6:46:04 AM PDT
by
Sloth
(We have to support RINOs like Specter; their states are too liberal to elect someone like Santorum.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-111 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson