Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/15/2004 6:16:27 AM PDT by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: Howlin; riley1992; Miss Marple; deport; Dane; sinkspur; steve; kattracks; JohnHuang2; ...

2 posted on 07/15/2004 6:17:32 AM PDT by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
The media, said Evan Thomas, assistant managing editor of Newsweek, in a unusual moment of candour the other day, ‘wants Kerry to win’ and so ‘they’re going to portray Kerry and Edwards as being young and dynamic and optimistic ...

And the New York Times is worried about bias at Fox. Nothing Fox is accused of doing even comes close to that bias. Newsweek is boldly admitting their magazine is just propaganda for Kerry.

5 posted on 07/15/2004 6:24:13 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78

Larry Sabito was on Fox this morning. Very depressing. He thinks Bush has to lose Cheney for another VP. He says for Bush this election is tied at best. Now I have some questions about this. Isn't Kerry supposed to be receiving his Edwards bounce now? Tied at best? On the other hand, we hear this story about the indifferent black voter base every election, and every election they vote in huge numbers for Democrats. Sabito also says Bush is losing in Pennsylvania and Florida right now...and that the electoral map looks just like four years ago, except that Bush has to get Florida back, and has a chance at Pennsylvania and Wisconsin this time. Anybody have any substantively good news out there? Has this country moved very far to the left? It's so scary.


6 posted on 07/15/2004 6:28:12 AM PDT by rushmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
Fabulous: Should be read into the record at the Republican Convention.

But the other reason I’d bet on Bush is more basic: he tends not to lose.

This is what the kool-aid drinkers refuse to see.

7 posted on 07/15/2004 6:28:57 AM PDT by maica (Hitlary says; "We are going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78

Botoxicated Brahmin Bloviator from Massachusetts. LOL, I think I'll be using that one with my democratic friends!


9 posted on 07/15/2004 6:31:45 AM PDT by EmilyGeiger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
But to say that you believe in voting against what you believe because you don’t believe in believing in your beliefs is as close as you can get to admitting that the flip-flop perception is true: you stand for nothing; there’s no there there.

Another Steyn classic.

This guy needs to get out more. He's fantastic.

10 posted on 07/15/2004 6:31:55 AM PDT by sinkspur (There's no problem on the inside of a kid that the outside of a dog can't cure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
The 2000 census brought about, yet again, a further draining of electoral muscle from the Democrat north-east to the Republican south and west. This means that even if Bush won only the states he won last time round, instead of a squeaker, he'd beat Kerry by 278 electoral college votes to 260.

An excellent observation. I haven't seen this pointed out anywhere else.

11 posted on 07/15/2004 6:32:37 AM PDT by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78

I don't think it is possible to split Maine's electoral votes evenly--either they will split 3-1 or 4-0, depending on who gets more votes in each Congressional district. It isn't possible to lose in both districts and still have a statewide popular plurality, unless they have some really fuzzy math involved.


12 posted on 07/15/2004 6:33:10 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
The only thing Thomas got wrong was that 15-point bounce. There was no discernible Edwards bounce outside his hair.

That wasn't a bounce. That was a flounce of the Breck girl's hair.

13 posted on 07/15/2004 6:33:54 AM PDT by dennisw (Once is Happenstance. Twice is Coincidence. The third time is Enemy action. - Ian Fleming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
...it’s about American resolve in dangerous times, Kerry and Edwards look way out of their league.

Bingo. This is the main issue of the election. Kerry/Edwards call American resolve arrogance and they minimize dangerous times simply because they have no new ideas. Like Clinton's foreign policy team, Kerry/Edwards will focus on sending little boys back to Cuba and empty treaty cerimonies as an opiate for the simple minded.

14 posted on 07/15/2004 6:35:52 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
But to say that you believe in voting against what you believe because you don’t believe in believing in your beliefs is as close as you can get to admitting that the flip-flop perception is true: you stand for nothing; there’s no there there.

I almost pity the Dems-not having a Mark Steyn.

Almost.

15 posted on 07/15/2004 6:36:33 AM PDT by 91B (God made man, Sam Colt made men equal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: A. Pole; Willie Green; XBob
A DNC water-carrier ping!
16 posted on 07/15/2004 6:38:00 AM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78

"Like a caged hamster,"

Can't stop laughing.


18 posted on 07/15/2004 6:40:39 AM PDT by bad company ((<a href="http://www.michaelmoore.com" target="_blank">Hatriotism))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
Pure gold...

"This is a first: a candidate who boasts that his conscience is at odds with his voting record. If you believe that abortion is the taking of a life, you vote against it. If you lose the vote, then you say, well, I personally believe life begins at conception, but I respect the will of the legislature, blah blah. But to say that you believe in voting against what you believe because you don’t believe in believing in your beliefs is as close as you can get to admitting that the flip-flop perception is true: you stand for nothing; there’s no there there."

19 posted on 07/15/2004 6:43:49 AM PDT by new cruelty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
He’s happy on his little hamster wheel, going round and round and getting nowhere, occasionally pausing to chew his nuts.

I thought that was Teresa's job.

he doesn’t believe he has the right to inflict his deeply held personal beliefs on Jacques Chirac, or Gerhard Schröder, or whoever the Belgian guy is.

LOL. Take that, Belgium!

20 posted on 07/15/2004 6:46:04 AM PDT by Sloth (We have to support RINOs like Specter; their states are too liberal to elect someone like Santorum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
Unfortunately, every so often, they’ll linger by the TV a little too long, Senator Someone Else will start to talk, and his party will remember that he is, indeed, John Kerry, and it’s too late to get another Someone Else.

In every Presidential election held in my lifetime, the more charismatic or likeable candidate won the election. The only exceptions to that might be Johnson/Goldwater and Nixon/McGovern where neither of the candidates had much of an edge.

This year, it is again no contest in the likeability department. Senator Someone Else is a clear loser.

21 posted on 07/15/2004 6:58:42 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78

Classic Steyn.

BTW, I happened to be surfing on the radio yesterday, and Steyn was on the Hugh Hewitt show @ 6:15 pm. I've never heard Hewitt's show before. Does anyone know if Steyn is a regular guest?


22 posted on 07/15/2004 7:00:30 AM PDT by baseballmom (Michael Moore - An un-American Hatriot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
A caged hamster’s never struck me as being that interested in poking the perimeter. He’s happy on his little hamster wheel, going round and round and getting nowhere, occasionally pausing to chew his nuts.

*Coffee spew*

23 posted on 07/15/2004 7:01:20 AM PDT by Lunatic Fringe (John F-ing Kerry??? NO... F-ING... WAY!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
Key demographics — such as blacks and Hispanics — are reported to be antipathetic to the candidate and difficult to corral.

I've been saying this for weeks. Blacks aren't going to the polls for Kerry the way they did for their Brother Clintoon.

26 posted on 07/15/2004 7:04:27 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tax-chick

later


29 posted on 07/15/2004 7:15:54 AM PDT by Tax-chick (GUNS - the anti-liberal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson