Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SHAKING WHOOPI
New York Post ^ | 7/15/04 | DEBORAH ORIN

Posted on 07/15/2004 12:11:55 AM PDT by kattracks

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last
To: P H Lewis

Wow, now I'm so confused, your post was so logical and yet I think I should reward SlimFast for their firing of Whoopi. I guess I better think about this one a little more.
Thanks for your thoughtful post.


41 posted on 07/15/2004 11:12:37 AM PDT by MontanaBeth (Conservative-says it all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: superiorslots
I agree, when a company makes a mea culpa, give them a break. Also, it wouldn't have been a big deal if she had conducted herself more responsibly in her endorsement of Kerry. Like other Rats, though, she didn't have anything good to say about Kerry, and the figuring among them is that nobody in their right mind would deliberately elect John Kerry, but they might find enough people willing to throw Bush out.

(it was the only channel I get in the garage when working on my Rustang)

What year? My brother had a cherry '65 with a four speed, but lost it in his divorce and his ex-wife wrecked it. Little light in the rear end, but the girls loved it.

42 posted on 07/15/2004 11:19:08 AM PDT by Richard Kimball (We sleep soundly in our beds because rough men are ready to do violence on our behalf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: P H Lewis

and you have every right to do as you see fit--I will join you in personnaly boycotting any company whose top execs give funds to Kerry and the lib cause to unseat our President. As a WW2 combat veteran, I am sure Kerry was an opportunist who put his crewmen in danger to get his "Purple Hearts" (3 with only a day off??)which he used to get out of the war---he would never receive my vote if a lizard was his opponent-


43 posted on 07/15/2004 11:37:42 AM PDT by cmotormac44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: MontanaBeth

MontanaBeth:

By all means, thank them if you wish as that's a decent and polite thing to do, but I'm just reluctant to "reward" them. I may even send them a thank you, too, inspite of what I said earlier, but I'm going to ask for more: An apology from Abrahams himself or the boycott continues. Don't stop the pursuit once you've got the enemy on the run! Don't let them regroup! To paraphrase Geo. C. Scott in "Patton":

"We're going to hold onto Unilever by the nose! We're going to kick it in the A$$! We're going to kick the hell out of them all the time, and we're going to go through them like $hit through a goose!"

(oddly, the dollar signs above are very appropriate.)

*cue the "Patton" theme music*

I'm off to polish my pearl-handled revolvers now. Dismissed! ;-)


44 posted on 07/15/2004 11:40:05 AM PDT by P H Lewis ("I wish somebody would tell me what diddy-wah-diddy means." - Blind Arthur Blake)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: P H Lewis

Excuse me...I meant my IVORY handled revolvers! *blush*


45 posted on 07/15/2004 11:45:16 AM PDT by P H Lewis ("I wish somebody would tell me what diddy-wah-diddy means." - Blind Arthur Blake)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: P H Lewis

Ad I mentioned in another thread if you really look into donations from corporations most give money to BOTH the Rats and the Republicans. All large companies lobby or have some dealings with lobby groups and work with both rat and Rpublican politicians. If a company gives only to the Republicans and a rat wins the rat may award contracts or have legislation that will hurt the company.

The company I work for gives just about equally. If somone really looks into Unilever I bet somewhere along the line money is gen to Republicans. Especially with Bush in office the last 4 years.


46 posted on 07/15/2004 11:53:59 AM PDT by superiorslots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: P H Lewis

I like your style.


47 posted on 07/15/2004 11:54:15 AM PDT by MontanaBeth (Conservative-says it all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Toespi

Let's keep pushing for the release of that fundraiser video!


48 posted on 07/15/2004 11:57:55 AM PDT by Ciexyz ("FR, best viewed with a budgie on hand")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Tamsey
I sent this message to support@slimfast.com:
Slim-Fast and Unilever made the right move in dropping the association with Whoopi Goldberg. I will pick up and extra case of Slim-Fast tonight!
49 posted on 07/15/2004 11:59:29 AM PDT by Chieftain ('W' in '04!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: P H Lewis

I also wanted to mention that everyone on this site has noted that Abraham has given plenty to the rats. I'm not disagreeing with that. However, has anyone posted how much Slimfast or Unilever has given to the Republicans? as a corporation?


50 posted on 07/15/2004 12:01:07 PM PDT by superiorslots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Richard Kimball

Quote: (it was the only channel I get in the garage when working on my Rustang)

What year? My brother had a cherry '65 with a four speed, but lost it in his divorce and his ex-wife wrecked it. Little light in the rear end, but the girls loved it.




Mine is a 64 1/2 convertible. It is a Mustang in name only.The body shell is mostly rust hence it's name Rustang.
I should have cut my losses and parted it out but I'm too far into the project to quit now.


51 posted on 07/15/2004 12:05:42 PM PDT by superiorslots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Irate Republican activists began burning up the Internet with calls to boycott Slim-Fast and Internet links to send protest emails to the company and its parent, Unilever.

The anti-Slim-Fast activists also traded proposed language for protest letters and phone calls as well as information on which alternate diet shake was the best substitute.

Thanks to all those who participated in the campaign to dump Whoopi as spokesperson.

52 posted on 07/15/2004 12:06:36 PM PDT by InHisService
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GailA

"Buying their product puts your money into hanoi john's pocket."

Exactly! I would still boycott.


53 posted on 07/15/2004 4:09:28 PM PDT by bluerose (I now begin the journey that will lead me into the sunset of my life. ..Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Jenya

I agree it is the end of her endorsements ... but we need to keep up the protests in case they ask that she is the emcee for the Oscars for instance. Republicans buy 50% of the goods and services in the US!


54 posted on 07/15/2004 4:19:28 PM PDT by BunnySlippers (Must get moose and squirrel ... B. Badanov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

I am still angry with Slimfast. According to their own conflict of Interest statement on their website:

"Unilever neither supports political parties nor contributes to the funds of groups whose activities are calculated to promote party interests."

Yea, right, tell that to your President Daniel Abraham, who donated 1.2 million to the democrats.

Link to another thread showing donations:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1171027/posts?page=254#254

I think Slimfast is hypocritical for firing Goldberg and not doing a thing about their own President.


55 posted on 07/15/2004 4:25:20 PM PDT by Republican Red (“‘I could give you an answer to that question if you give me a little time to think about it.’)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P H Lewis
I agree with you. I don't mind complaining to SlimFast and nagging them to stop using Whoopi ... but I won't buy their products again in any case. One strike, yer out!

And Unilever is a multinational. Chances are you will use one of their products without knowing it. Paint, wrapping paper, spring water, audiotape, plant food, computer circuits, metal alloys, dishwashing soap ... it's hard to keep track of multinationals.

56 posted on 07/15/2004 4:28:06 PM PDT by BunnySlippers (Must get moose and squirrel ... B. Badanov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Fun Bob

Most "entertainers" if you can call them that, think that they can just voice their unadulterated political opinions without recourse. We need to let them know that by selling themselves as a spokeman for a product that they are a "commodity" ... no longer an individual allowed to run off on their own. Ask Kobe!


57 posted on 07/15/2004 4:32:07 PM PDT by BunnySlippers (Must get moose and squirrel ... B. Badanov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Beautiful day for democracy. Maybe if she had stuck with that coathanger and layed off the booze.


58 posted on 07/15/2004 8:04:10 PM PDT by BC girl (Nero fiddled as Komrade Hillary sang, "We will take things away from you for the common good.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz
Michael Moore's

Moore may be in trouble in Trudeapia for breaking "their" election laws.

59 posted on 07/15/2004 8:35:21 PM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson