Posted on 07/14/2004 10:39:13 AM PDT by B-Chan
One of the greatest possible crimes is undoubtedly an attack upon sovereignty, no other having such terrible consequences. If sovereignty resides in one man and this man falls victim to an outrage, the crime of lese-majesté augments the atrocity. But if this sovereign has not deserved his fate through any fault of his own, if his very virtues have strengthened the guilty against him, the crime is beyond description. This is the case in the death of Louis XVI; but what is important to note is that never has such a great crime had more accomplices. The death of Charles I had far fewer, even though it was possible to bring charges against him that Louis XVI did not merit. Yet many proofs were given of the most tender and courageous concern for him; even the executioner, who was obliged to obey, did not dare to make himself known. But in France, Louis XVI marched to his death in the middle of 60,000 armed men who did not have a single shot for their king, not a voice was raised for the unfortunate monarch, and the provinces were as silent as the capital. We would expose ourselves, it was said. Frenchmen—if you find this a good reason, talk no more of your courage or admit that you misuse it!. . . .
Each drop of Louis XVI's blood will cost France torrents; perhaps four million Frenchmen will pay with their lives for the great national crime of an antireligious and antisocial insurrection, crowned by a regicide. . . .
Yet it is here that we can appreciate order in disorder; because it is evident, however little one reflects on it, that the great criminals of the Revolution can fall only under the blows of their accomplices. If force alone were to bring about what is called the counterrevolution and replace the king on the throne, there would be no means of doing justice.
Joseph de Maistre; from The Works of Joseph de Maistre, Jack Lively, ed. and trans., (NY: Shocken Books, 1971 [1965]), pp. 50–53.
Bump for the Crown crew...
Thanks B-Chan. I liked your Mecca Cathedral, btw, though I'd "settle" for Hagia Sofia.
Greetings from Switzerland, one of Europe's few legitimate republics! I haven't seen all of the above screennames before, though a couple are certainly familiar. If I may be forgiven a shameless plug, those interested in the excellent topic of monarchy might also enjoy a visit to my own website:
http://www.angelfire.com/in3/theodore
A few more who I thought should see this thread...
You don't say! I'll be passing through Verbier in about 8 weeks, trekking the Haute Route.
I'll be gone then (leaving August 2). It's beautiful here.
white with a black arm-band
...and I did get a little wicked laugh watching the republican dragoon fall of his horse in the march to the Arch of Triumph. However, though I realize why it is done etc, etc, it still annoys me that other monarchs take part or have their people take part in celebrating such a thing. A year or two ago the (Bourbon!!) King of Spain was present and this year I saw some of Her Majesty's redcoats taking part in the parade. Ah well, c'est l'politique.
Vive le Roi!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.