Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/12/2004 6:35:54 PM PDT by Dr. Marten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Dr. Marten
we need an additional supply equivalent to four more Three Gorges hydroelectric dams, 26 Yanzhou coalmines, six Daqing oilfields, eight gas pipelines and 20 nuclear power plants, as well as 400 thermal power generators and the network to link them all together.'

And it's all sitting to the North ... in Siberia.

2 posted on 07/12/2004 6:38:42 PM PDT by Centurion2000 (Many a law, many a commandment have I broken, but my word never.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: *China stuff; HighRoadToChina; maui_hawaii; Slyfox; Free the USA; rightwing2; borghead; ChaseR; ...

Ping.


3 posted on 07/12/2004 6:39:08 PM PDT by Dr. Marten (I donated to the Democratic Party today, but I forgot to flush it down the toilet....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dr. Marten

Invest Now?


4 posted on 07/12/2004 6:40:04 PM PDT by maestro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dr. Marten

Interesting post..however, if as many assume..much of the Chines economic growth turns out to resemble the "Massachusets miracale"..or doesn'tmplode under a weight of bad/fradulent loans..then this is a handy,a nd face saving excuse..


5 posted on 07/12/2004 6:40:49 PM PDT by ken5050 (We've looked for WMD in Iraq for LESS time than Hillary looked for the Rose Law firm billing records)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dr. Marten

I just don't see the problem. The Chinese seem to have a pretty free market economy at this point, so it will adjust to balance demand versus supply. I only wish the US liberals would stop tinkering with our economy. With all of the regulations, taxes, and mandated employee programs, we handicap our economy. Of course, China is also more likely to experience a nuclear plant melt-down than we are! I guess some regulations are OK. 8)


6 posted on 07/12/2004 6:54:36 PM PDT by CitizenUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dr. Marten

Wasn't it the rationale of the environmentalists to shift the dirty manufacturing plants to developing nations in order to reduce pollution and energy use in the United States? Well, they've succeeded. Except that the pollution isn't gone, it's just transferred. And the energy use isn't lessened. It's multiplied many times with the accelerated industrialization of this major population center. Nice work, fellows. I'm sure you know where we can get some extra oil reserves, because the Chinese will be competing for all of the ones we have now.


8 posted on 07/12/2004 8:39:46 PM PDT by henderson field
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson