Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Social Conservatives Locked Out of GOP Prime Time
NewsMax ^ | 7/12/04 | Phil Brennan

Posted on 07/12/2004 6:12:22 PM PDT by wagglebee

Social conservatives feel they are getting short shrift from the Republican National Committee’s lineup of speakers at the GOP convention in New York this year, reports the New York Times.

Thus far, prime time speaking slots are nearly bereft of those who share the views of the party's conservative majority - a vital voting bloc the Bush campaign desperately needs if it is to win in November.

Still, the Times writes:

Even though Karl Rove "emphasized the importance of turning out conservative churchgoers" who didn't vote in the numbers he expected in 2000, and even though they are a "major target of [GOP] voter registration efforts," it doesn't seem they will be well represented in prime time at the convention in NY.

The Rev. Donald E. Wildmon, founder of the American Family Association, told the Times the "Bush campaign had made mistakes, including its outreach to churches and the omission of more social conservatives from the convention so far. 'They have alienated people who they desperately need, big time,' he said."

The Bush/Cheney campaign has miffed some churchgoers with certain voter-registration tactics, including having congregations send the campaign their registries.

Richard Land, president of the Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission of the conservative Southern Baptist Convention, told the Times: "I'm appalled that the Bush-Cheney campaign would intrude on a local congregation in this way."

President Bush is the only visible national conservative who has "turned up his own talk of opposition to abortion and especially same-sex marriage," which is up for debate in the Senate this week.

Moderates like McCain, Giuliani, Pataki, and Schwarzenegger will all speak in prime time at the GOP confab, but no true social conservative other than President Bush will garner precious, limited network airtime.

The most like-minded person with a featured speaking role is Senator Zell Miller, a Democrat from Georgia.

He drew fire from National Review's Washington editor Kate O'Beirne, who wrote, "When the only Reagan Republican to enjoy a prominent supporting role at the party's convention is a Democrat, the GOP has a serious identity problem."

The roster of speakers, she added, "is not the mark of a self-confident party establishment."

More ominous was the warning from long time conservative activist Paul Weyrich: "I hate to say it, but... If the president is embarrassed to be seen with conservatives at the convention, maybe conservatives will be embarrassed to be seen with the president on Election Day."

More conciliatory was Gary Bauer, a social conservative candidate who sought the Republican presidential nomination in 2000.

Noting the Bush backs the Constitutional amendment defining marriage as being solely between a man and woman, now being debated in the Senate, Bauer, the founder of the American Values organization, added. "We had been assured months ago that as this vote happened the president would take an active role - both publicly and on Capitol Hill. So they are keeping their word and my hat goes off to them for that."

But he told the Times, "If they are going to win the values debate - and it looks like there is going to be one - it is important for the president's words to be reinforced by other major personalities at the convention."

He added that his fellow social conservatives continue to push for greater representation at the convention, and said that the President should address abortion, same-sex marriage and similar issues prominently when he speaks to the convention.

Answering conservative critics, Bush campaign spokesman Steve Schmidt told the Times Sunday: "The Republican Party is a national party, and the convention lineup will reflect the broad national appeal of the Republican Party. When the speaker lineup is complete, it will reflect that."


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: conservatives; conservativism; gopconvention; ncconvention; newshacks; zellmiller
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 201 next last
To: All
1. If that intolerant, pimply-faced, meglomaniac, dwarf speaks at the convention, I will spend Election Day in a brothel. I saw one self-appointed "conservative" inquisitor poison MY PARTY.
2. There are those who equate conservative with intolerance. I, personally, think of it more respectful of the Constitution, of individual and economic freedom, Pro-life of course. Anything that gets in my way should be a felony.
3. I doubt the intellectual honesty of those so concerned with the social conservatives speaking at the event.
4. I would have to believe Ms. Rice would be speaking.
121 posted on 07/12/2004 8:15:28 PM PDT by olde north church (Logic made me a conservative, circumstance made me a zealot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: olde north church
I saw one self-appointed "conservative" inquisitor poison MY PARTY.

You mean on the 8th at Radio City? They still won't release that tape.

There are those who equate conservative with intolerance.

You do. And the leftwing 'mainstream' agree.

I doubt the intellectual honesty of those so concerned with the social conservatives speaking at the event.

Yeah - they'll just futz-up the Party, right?

or is that left?

122 posted on 07/12/2004 8:20:43 PM PDT by sevry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: sevry; admin

I don't need this poser's b.s.. Am I wrong?


123 posted on 07/12/2004 8:25:36 PM PDT by olde north church (Logic made me a conservative, circumstance made me a zealot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: olde north church
If that intolerant, pimply-faced, meglomaniac, dwarf speaks at the convention

I'm quite sure that Robert Reich is not on the invite list. ;o)

124 posted on 07/12/2004 8:28:32 PM PDT by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: olde north church
to sevry: admin

I didn't realize my alias had changed to sevry: admin. Glad it got through, anyway.

125 posted on 07/12/2004 8:30:25 PM PDT by sevry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: malakhi

Oh, I forgot about that other etc, etc, thanks!


126 posted on 07/12/2004 8:31:07 PM PDT by olde north church (Logic made me a conservative, circumstance made me a zealot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
long time conservative activist Paul Weyrich: "I hate to say it, but... If the president is embarrassed to be seen with conservatives at the convention, maybe conservatives will be embarrassed to be seen with the president on Election Day."

Kerry WILL destroy this country the rest of the way. Ain't no way I won't vote for Bush...but if the bots could stop deluding themselves for 5 seconds, they would realize that Mr. Weyrich is correct.

It has been proven that without strong enthusiastic base support, you can not win.

IMO, Bush is making a very large mistake. Deja-Vu.. We'll see who gets to eat crow on election day!!!

127 posted on 07/12/2004 8:55:48 PM PDT by Indie (Ignorance of the truth is no excuse for stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear

Or they are seeing proof of the suspicion that Bush is not likely to sing the same song or perhaps even the same melody in his last four.

If he doesn't they would feel responsible for whatever makes that agenda depart from what they would have supported. Rather than bear the "responsible" guilt they would prefer to sit on their hands in the election. It's signaling a "stay home" message.

Question is, where would it leave them if he deceived them by promises and actions and then performed the same unsupportable agenda. That answer could be a third party.


128 posted on 07/12/2004 9:08:48 PM PDT by Spirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Spirited

Most social conservatives are not that dumb that they would vote for a third party. If they were then they damn well deserve what they get.


129 posted on 07/12/2004 9:16:48 PM PDT by newfarm4000n (Taxes for social security is theft)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Four years of Kerry could destroy our nation.


130 posted on 07/12/2004 9:45:41 PM PDT by jfreif (I like my money and my guns.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Scenic Sounds

Too reasonable. Get lost. ; )


131 posted on 07/12/2004 9:52:09 PM PDT by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet (They call it "PMS" because "Mad Cow Disease" was already taken.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: CajunConservative
We need to keep the moderate pubbies on board at least until after the election in order to win.

I suspect that the reality is that those 'moderate pubbies', led by Rove, are saying "We need to keep those goofy social conservatives on board at least until after the election in order to win."

I think my version is far more consistent with the observable facts. But this state of affairs is nothing new.
132 posted on 07/12/2004 10:17:50 PM PDT by George W. Bush (It's the Congress, stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: jfreif
Four years of Kerry could destroy our nation.

What do you think sixteen years of Kerry/Edwards will do to it?

133 posted on 07/12/2004 10:19:01 PM PDT by Howlin (John Kerry & John Edwards: Political Malpractice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Spirited
That answer could be a third party.

There's already about 50 third parties.

134 posted on 07/12/2004 10:20:02 PM PDT by Howlin (John Kerry & John Edwards: Political Malpractice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Indie
It has been proven that without strong enthusiastic base support, you can not win.

I'll tell you again: 97 percent of conservatives -- THE BASE -- support Bush. Period.

135 posted on 07/12/2004 10:21:08 PM PDT by Howlin (John Kerry & John Edwards: Political Malpractice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
George Bush
Dick Cheny
Laura Bush
Lynne Cheney


I would only count Lynne Cheney as a true social conservative on that list. She has a very long and consistent track record. Unlike the others, she has never fawned over increasing NEA funding or sending AIDS money to Africa or other liberal causes now funded by GOP patronage.

If only the others really were as reliably conservative as Lynne Cheney.
136 posted on 07/12/2004 10:21:45 PM PDT by George W. Bush (It's the Congress, stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Tamsey

Yes, again.

It's not a pretty picture, is it?


137 posted on 07/12/2004 10:22:58 PM PDT by Howlin (John Kerry & John Edwards: Political Malpractice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush

Well, you be the judge of who's real and who's not.


138 posted on 07/12/2004 10:23:29 PM PDT by Howlin (John Kerry & John Edwards: Political Malpractice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Folks, the speaking portions of the convention are, in essence, a show, meant to affect the swing voters. McCain, Schwarzenegger, and certainly Giuliani are very popular with swing voters (you can argue rightly or wrongly, but it is still a fact). McCain and Giuliani will almost certainly focus on security issues -- something that is definitely conservative.


139 posted on 07/12/2004 10:27:23 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I agree, but remember how Dole seemed to abandon the base and what happened.

They always lose when they abandon their base...ask Bush Sr.


140 posted on 07/12/2004 10:27:51 PM PDT by ETERNAL WARMING (He is faithful!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 201 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson