Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: who_would_fardels_bear

Or they are seeing proof of the suspicion that Bush is not likely to sing the same song or perhaps even the same melody in his last four.

If he doesn't they would feel responsible for whatever makes that agenda depart from what they would have supported. Rather than bear the "responsible" guilt they would prefer to sit on their hands in the election. It's signaling a "stay home" message.

Question is, where would it leave them if he deceived them by promises and actions and then performed the same unsupportable agenda. That answer could be a third party.


128 posted on 07/12/2004 9:08:48 PM PDT by Spirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: Spirited

Most social conservatives are not that dumb that they would vote for a third party. If they were then they damn well deserve what they get.


129 posted on 07/12/2004 9:16:48 PM PDT by newfarm4000n (Taxes for social security is theft)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]

To: Spirited
That answer could be a third party.

There's already about 50 third parties.

134 posted on 07/12/2004 10:20:02 PM PDT by Howlin (John Kerry & John Edwards: Political Malpractice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]

To: Spirited
If the "answer" is fringe paarties,then the question had to be:

What do political naifs push,becuase they are only truly happy,when radical,lefty Dems hold every elected office in this land?

143 posted on 07/12/2004 10:31:47 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson