Posted on 07/12/2004 7:52:29 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
I clearly recall Buchanan's speech at the Houston GOP convention having watched it live and recoreded it on tape for future review.
I listened to it at least 3 times. This was when Pat was still a Republican and before he went off the deep end.
Personally, I thought this was one of the greatest speeched ever given at a convention. The media went NUTS. They talked about His hate filled, mean spirited speech for MONTHS on every single TV show and in every article written on the convention.
This year our convention will be full of moderates and boring speeches. Would you prefer conservative speeches that speak to many of our values AND the months of media criticism and labeling of the GOP as hateful? I would. Reagan spread the conservative word and I think the GOP of the 21st century should do the same and stop trying to run from our values.
Its a smart political move, but I would prefer watching a replay of the late-great Ronald Reagan's "Rendezvous with Destiny" speech. I may just have to do that after watching the GOP convention!
Regards, Ivan
Pataki is the governor of the state that the convention is being held in; it's SOP.
Care to explain why the Buchanan speech made you quit the party. That seems a little extreme, considering it was the speech of a man who had been beaten like a gong in the primaries. It's not like he was representing the main-stream Republican voice. He was representing his 5% of primary voters.
Did I miss something, or were the words "culture war" never mentioned. I looked at the speech and say that there is nothing hate filled about it. I guess the talk about the mobs of people at the LA riots was supposedly taken as racial?
Yeah, and I would much prefer that my mortgage company marked my account "paid in full" and that the IRS would lose all records that I exist. That ain't gonna happen either.
Pataki could put an amphetimine addict to sleep.
So did I.
To the "REAL CONSERVATIVE" Americans Buchanan, and his views have always been considered patriotic, America first, and very eloquent. The liberals will always throw labels at you to vilify you, if you are good.
Actually the biggest factor in Clinton getting elected, by FAR, was Perot. Look at the low pluralities he won in state after state and in the nationwide popular vote. Without the big-eared dummy it would have been a very close election and Bush1 might well have prevailed saving us from years of Xlintonism.
He was on in PRIME TIME.....he put the ugly face on the GOP.
Which would be whom??
zell miller
What does that have to do with anything?
Have you forgotten that Lynne and Dick Cheney will be speaking? Are they RINOS?
Have you forgotten that the networks are going to show ONE HOUR a night, if that? And don't pretend that during that hour, WHATEVER is happening, the networks' talking heads aren't going to be talking over it.
Perot have not had one single statement or an interview since 9/11? What is wrong with that?
Who watches the networks anymore. People will watch on the cable channels.
Of course. I forgot about Zell. That's one Dem I'd like to see as Pres. Not that he'd ever make it through the primaries without compromising his principles (which I don't think he'd do).
The point is that Buchanan ran against George H.W. Bush. Unlike Ronald Reagan's speech at the 1976 convention, Buchanan's speech was not the speech of a vanquished opponent, cheerfully conceding and promising to fight another day. It was a nasty screed that basically said "I'm still right and all of you who didn't vote for me are un-American idiots." It was the most obnoxious speech I have ever heard.
Pat Buchanan gave us eight years of Bill Clinton. He is a useless POS for that reason alone. I wouldn't pee on him if he was on fire.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.