Skip to comments.
High Bias: "Mainstream" reporters aren't just liberal – they're fanatical.
The Wall Street Journal Opinion Journal ^
| July 12, 2004
| Orson Scott Card
Posted on 07/11/2004 9:18:35 PM PDT by quidnunc
Edited on 07/11/2004 9:50:27 PM PDT by Admin Moderator.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81 next last
To: Paleo Conservative
"But the reporters covering science in America today are so wretchedly miseducated that they don't even know what questions to ask when interviewing biased sources." Yeah!
Like, "Can you prove that others' besides yourself have minds and aren't just pre-programmed robots?"
Like, "Are you aware that Albert Einstein laughed at pop-culture junk scientists like Carl 'The cosmos is all that is or ever was or ever will be' Sagan, when he acknowledged that, "The harmony of natural law ... reveals an intelligence of such superiority, that compared with it, all the systematic thinking and acting of human beings is an utterly insignificant reflection."
61
posted on
07/12/2004 8:18:23 AM PDT
by
Matchett-PI
(All DemocRATS are either relativists, libertines or anarchists.)
To: Valin
There really needs to be another term for the "mainstream media". I'm a news junkie, but it's getting to the point where I can't watch/read it.
There is a Nobel Laureate named Buchannan who developed an economic theory of politics - one conclusion of which is that there is no point in becoming a Congressman unless you pass laws. That is, power isn't power unless you use it, so everyone who gets power uses it - and even if it ain't broke, Congress will still fix it. If you apply that to PR power, you conclude that PR power isn't PR power unless you use it to in one way or another induce people to believe something which is not so. So journalists have to put something over on the public to prove that they are somebody, and the bigger whopper they can gull people into, the more of a somebody they are.
And the whopper that they can agree on is that "the sky is falling" - so you had better buy the paper and read all about it. And vote for whoever slings blame for "the problem" the best - vote for a lawyer like Edwards rather than a manager like Bush or Cheney.
62
posted on
07/12/2004 8:28:29 AM PDT
by
conservatism_IS_compassion
(Pseudo objective journalism is the noise and smoke brigade of the Democratic Party.)
To: Tolik
Wall Street Journal reprints Orson Scott Card article Hmmm; old news, eh? Good to see the WSJ pick it up even if they are running a little behind.
FGS
63
posted on
07/12/2004 8:51:53 AM PDT
by
ForGod'sSake
(ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
To: Valin
Hi Valin
There really needs to be another term for the "mainstream media".
Indeed. I like Orwell's about as well as any:
Ministry of Truth
FGS
64
posted on
07/12/2004 8:58:40 AM PDT
by
ForGod'sSake
(ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
To: conservatism_IS_compassion
"the sky is falling" - so you had better buy the paper and read all about it. And vote for whoever slings blame for "the problem" the best - vote for a lawyer like Edwards rather than a manager like Bush or Cheney."
Do I detect a hint of sarcasm? :-)
65
posted on
07/12/2004 8:59:45 AM PDT
by
Valin
(Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. It's just that yours is stupid.)
To: conservatism_IS_compassion
The "mainstream media" convey the perspective that they do because that perspective - "the sky is falling!" - attracts attention. Agreed to a point; "If it bleeds, it leads" mentality. It only explains part of their obsession with things utopian. I'd be willing to bet journalism as a profession(?) generally attracts non-producers. After all, what do they actually have to do to make a paycheck? Parrot the party(utopian) line? I knew there was a reason I never liked English 101.
FGS
66
posted on
07/12/2004 9:09:08 AM PDT
by
ForGod'sSake
(ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
To: Smartass; quidnunc
No, no, even they get it wrong! It is:
MaiMstream reporters!
67
posted on
07/12/2004 9:12:56 AM PDT
by
Lady Jag
(Used to be sciencediet (AKA Tad Rad) but found the solution)
To: Valin
68
posted on
07/12/2004 9:15:38 AM PDT
by
Lady Jag
(Used to be sciencediet (AKA Tad Rad) but found the solution)
To: Lady Jag
:-)
69
posted on
07/12/2004 9:33:12 AM PDT
by
Valin
(Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. It's just that yours is stupid.)
To: Lady Jag; Valin
MaiMstream reporters! Close - it'sMiasmaStream Reporters.
70
posted on
07/12/2004 9:50:47 AM PDT
by
conservatism_IS_compassion
(Pseudo objective journalism is the noise and smoke brigade of the Democratic Party.)
To: quidnunc
Quid,
Good catch on this article!....also, I never thought I'd see then day when a Mod would have to excerpt an article that you posted! :-)
Cheers from Toronto....
71
posted on
07/12/2004 9:52:30 AM PDT
by
ConservativeStLouisGuy
(11th FReeper Commandment: Thou Shalt Not Unnecessarily Excerpt)
To: MeekOneGOP
Good one...
72
posted on
07/12/2004 10:37:04 AM PDT
by
Smartass
( BUSH & CHENEY IN 2004 - Si vis pacem, para bellum - Por el dedo de Dios se escribió.)
To: conservatism_IS_compassion
No, it's
MaiMstream reporters!
73
posted on
07/12/2004 10:56:31 AM PDT
by
Lady Jag
(Used to be sciencediet (AKA Tad Rad) but found the solution)
To: concerned about politics
Here in NC we've got a former beauty queen (D) running against Rep. Robin Hayes (R). Her experience qualification is working for the TV WEST WING show. Her main campaign contributions have come from the producers and staff of that show.
To: Lady Jag
75
posted on
07/12/2004 11:17:00 AM PDT
by
Smartass
( BUSH & CHENEY IN 2004 - Si vis pacem, para bellum - Por el dedo de Dios se escribió.)
To: hang 'em
Hey, Wo Wo... Now that's the time to move in baby, YEAH!!!! You know what I'm say'n. Yeah baby, Yeah!!!!! She need help. Stick it to her!!!! SHe beggin fo'it. Liberal babes need serious attention.She wasn't exactley attractive, she was somebody's sister who tagged along that night.
After crying for awhile, she went home.
76
posted on
07/12/2004 2:12:12 PM PDT
by
Sonny M
("oderint dum metuant")
To: Smartass
77
posted on
07/12/2004 5:37:00 PM PDT
by
MeekOneGOP
(There is only one GOOD 'RAT: one that has been voted OUT of POWER !! Straight ticket GOP!)
To: Smartass
78
posted on
07/12/2004 9:13:22 PM PDT
by
Boazo
(LOSE THE TAG LINE)
To: GeronL
...and Greenich Village.
I believe that it should be spelled Greenitch village
To: GeronL
...and Greenich Village.
I believe that it should be spelled Greenitch village
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson