Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

***Libya Expected To Announce in September Report That Iraqi WMD DID Exist And Were Develped THERE**
Fox News | Stardate: 0407.11

Posted on 07/11/2004 8:31:23 AM PDT by The Wizard

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 381-385 next last
To: gilliam

Post GOP convention bounce and people will actually be paying attention to the '04 election finally. Timing is everything.


161 posted on 07/11/2004 11:35:10 AM PDT by Agamemnon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Agamemnon

bttt and thanks to all for the additional info and links


162 posted on 07/11/2004 11:36:04 AM PDT by The Wizard (Democrats: enemies of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

Libya!!


163 posted on 07/11/2004 11:42:22 AM PDT by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
Man ! If TRUE, this is great ! haha !

164 posted on 07/11/2004 11:45:49 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP (I am the Will Rogers voter: I never met a Democrat I didn't like - to vote OUT OF POWER ! haha !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: The Wizard

It would certainly explain why Libya decided to roll over! LOL! No doubt they thought the truth would come out with the fall of Iraq, and they would jump to number one on the target list. Better to roll over and become a hero.


165 posted on 07/11/2004 11:48:14 AM PDT by TheDon (The Democratic Party is the party of TREASON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64

Why are they waiting to release it in September?

The greater question is what Kaddafy wants in return for vindicating the Bush and Blair administrations, I think.


166 posted on 07/11/2004 11:49:36 AM PDT by Solamente
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Agamemnon

And Libya wants Bush to win? I don't buy it.


167 posted on 07/11/2004 11:51:27 AM PDT by gilliam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: gilliam

Maybe we have him in a hammerlock!!!

Right around his scrawny neck!!!


168 posted on 07/11/2004 11:55:37 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (.New Linux SUSE Pro 9.1 user here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: Iwentsouth

Maybe this is why Libya got out of the WMD business right away .. and I believe the comment was .. "I saw what the USA did to Saddam and I was afraid". Surely Libya knew they were one on a list of NEXT!


169 posted on 07/11/2004 12:08:13 PM PDT by CyberAnt (President Bush: a core set of principles from which he will not deviate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt

indeed....they knew about the connection and probably wanted to get ahead of it...


170 posted on 07/11/2004 12:14:28 PM PDT by The Wizard (Democrats: enemies of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: mabelkitty; Grampa Dave; Miss Marple
My theory?
This was a repot by consensus, and Roberts used his clout vis a vis the Judicial Memos to get consent on wording.
Now, for some odd reason, Olympia Snowe, Rockefeller and all other liberal Senators on the Intel Committee are demanding Bush appoint a CIA head NOW NOW NOW.
I know there is a connection there somewhere, but, for the life of me, I don't know what it is.

If the Democrats (and moderate Republicans) successfully call for nomination of a new CIA director, it has to be approved by the Senate. That can shift the attention away from the WH to the Senate. The Democratic candidates are both Senators and their party can Bork anything that's nominated between now and the end of time on live television.

Plus, John Edwards is a sitting member of the Senate Intelligence commitee that oversees the initial hearing. That's a lot of free air time in a CFR-regulated world.

171 posted on 07/11/2004 12:28:40 PM PDT by jriemer (We are a Republic not a Democracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: The Wizard

Bookmarked and Bumped. Great thread. I love watching history in the making.


172 posted on 07/11/2004 12:28:58 PM PDT by keats5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peach

Zowie!


173 posted on 07/11/2004 12:30:08 PM PDT by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Peach

There also is information, if I recall, about nuclear information in CHinese found in Libya. It didn't get much press. From Clinton to China to Libya to Iraq. How quaint. /sarc.


174 posted on 07/11/2004 12:33:11 PM PDT by combat_boots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: The Wizard

Monica Crowley talking about this now on WABC radio in NYC.


175 posted on 07/11/2004 12:36:24 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All


If the "hollowed out mountain" and the scientists and potentially the uranium were all in Libya, then why didn't we go into Libya rather than Iraq?

(I haven't read the full thread yet, so perhaps this has already been addressed.)


176 posted on 07/11/2004 12:45:52 PM PDT by BagCamAddict
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Wizard

Bump for Reference


177 posted on 07/11/2004 12:47:33 PM PDT by TLI ( . . . ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA . . . . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Wizard; Peach; My2Cents; MEG33
Thanks for a great thread.

Peach, if you are going to keep a file on Libya/Iraq/WMD connection, please put me on your PING list for any new developments.

Finally the "Ali Sobree" that was mentioned by Loftus must be Naji Sabri Ahmad al-Hadithi

Here's what is written about him at:

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/iraq/sabri.htm

Dr. Naji Sabri, Minister of Foreign Affairs, was Ambassador of Iraq to Austria and Permanent Representative to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) and to the United Nations Office (Vienna) during 1999-2001. On April 18, 2001, he was appointed Minister of State for Foreign Affairs, and on August 4, 2001 he was named Minister of Foreign Affairs.

Note the underlined; quite a coincidence isn't it?

Further biographical notes from Online Newshour:

Iraqi Foreign Minister Naji Sabri Ahmad al-Hadithi's primary role is leading Iraq's diplomatic efforts to weaken support for a possible U.S. military attack. He has continued to lobby permanent United Nations Security Council members as part of Baghdad's efforts to shore up international support, including visits to Russia and China. Sabri has also met with a delegation from India and the 22-member Arab League.

He has also spearheaded efforts to reach out to former enemies in an effort to find new allies against the U.S. During a five-day meeting in January 2002 in Iran, once Iraq's central foe, he told Iranian President Mohammad Khatami that U.S. behavior "is not just a threat to us, but a threat to the Islamic world."

Sabri has been part of the ongoing high-level talks with U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan and chief U.N. weapons inspector Dr. Hans Blix. And it was Sabri, along with Arab League chief Amr Moussa, who delivered the letter in September from the Iraqi government to Annan saying Saddam Hussein would allow weapons inspectors back into Iraq.

Sabri was appointed Foreign Minister last year. A member of a historically powerful family, he holds a doctorate in English literature. During the Gulf War, he was Deputy Information Minister and, at one time, ran Iraq's press office in London. Before his appointment, he served as an ambassador to Austria.

Sabri is considered more of a technocrat than a political leader. Some view him as an interim figure in the Hussein cabinet though he is said to be close friends with Saddam's younger son, Qusay.

-- By Raven Tyler, Online NewsHour

Cheers,

ScaniaBoy

178 posted on 07/11/2004 12:49:49 PM PDT by ScaniaBoy (Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: mabelkitty
I just heard on Fox that information about WMDs may not be released because it could embarrass some of our allies???

I believe this is correct. The mountains of incriminating WMD evidence must be suppressed due to its potential to embarrass allies.

It seems the primary problem is who it would incriminate.
179 posted on 07/11/2004 12:50:54 PM PDT by George W. Bush (It's the Congress, stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

please let us know what she says


180 posted on 07/11/2004 12:56:59 PM PDT by The Wizard (Democrats: enemies of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 381-385 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson