Skip to comments.
Bush's cat India gets Indians enraged
Yahoo! India News ^
| July 2, 2004
| Indo-Asian News Service
Posted on 07/10/2004 7:09:06 PM PDT by k2blader
Friday July 2, 4:15 PM
Bush's cat India gets Indians enraged
By Indo-Asian News Service
Thiruvananthapuram, July 2 (IANS) Angry youths in this Kerala capital Friday burnt an effigy of US President George W. Bush, not because they are anti-American but because he has named his cat India.
Members of the citizens group Prathikarana Vedi assembled before the Kerala assembly saying that Bush calling his cat India was an insult to the country.
"This is a disgrace to our great country and this has come from none other than US President George W. Bush. This is nothing but an insult to India because there are hundreds of thousands of Indians in US, and many who occupy key posts in the White House," said M.A. Latheef, president of the group.
"He should make amends," Latheef added.
The members of the group walked to the front gate of the assembly building but were stopped by police. After a brief speech and some slogans, the members burnt an effigy of the US president.
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Political Humor/Cartoons
KEYWORDS: animalwhackos; bitter711rejects; bush; cat; goodgrief; idiots; india; layoffthehotcurry
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161-174 next last
To: annyokie
>>What's the big deal? Cats answer to the electic can opener only.<<
Ain't that the truth!
To: oyez
I think I can hear Don Henley singing, "Get ovet itKnowing Henley's politics, I wouldn't bet on it.
142
posted on
07/11/2004 6:02:27 AM PDT
by
dfwgator
(It's sad that the news media treats Michael Jackson better than our military.)
To: Mercat
I love that book. I read it to my boys when they were small. We even had a cat named Jennyanydots.
143
posted on
07/11/2004 7:54:04 AM PDT
by
annyokie
(Sure, take all the umbrage.)
To: PetroniDE; Lady Jag; SAMWolf
I didn't know the President had a cat.
144
posted on
07/11/2004 8:11:42 AM PDT
by
Springman
(God has called Ronald Reagan home 6-5-04)
To: Springman
Yeah, they have a cat. I saw this thread yesterday and avoided it because whiners make me puke.
The only publishable answer is to boycott all Indian products.
145
posted on
07/11/2004 8:37:18 AM PDT
by
Lady Jag
(Used to be sciencediet (AKA Tad Rad) but found the solution)
To: Paul Atreides
I can think of no better name for a pussy than Chiraq.BINGO, we have a WINNER!
146
posted on
07/11/2004 8:40:20 AM PDT
by
Chieftain
('W' in '04!)
To: cyborg
Members of the citizens group Prathikarana Vedi assembled before the Kerala assembly saying that Bush calling his cat India was an insult to the country. Yep, lots of people/cultures are easily insulted it seems. Does get to be tiresome after awhile.
To: k2blader
Holy Cow !!! Next thing ya know, somebody will get all worked up over Mahatma
® Rice ! Then there's UNCLE BEN'S
® Rice !
Everytime you turn around, you Gore somebody's ox !!
148
posted on
07/11/2004 9:39:57 AM PDT
by
Eagle9
To: k2blader
I think I'll make a few tech support calls and take an informal poll on the topic...
149
posted on
07/11/2004 9:46:01 AM PDT
by
mikrofon
(Flush the Johns in every state this November!)
To: k2blader
They are really going to be mad when they find out I named an oil well we drilled in New Mexico the "Gandhi #1".
To: k2blader
Angry youths in this Kerala capital Friday burnt an effigy of US President George W. Bush, not because they are anti-American but because he has named his cat India. This just in. . .
India threatens to withold all high tech and engineering infrastructure support from the U.S. unless and until George W. Bush changes the name of his cat.
151
posted on
07/11/2004 9:53:40 AM PDT
by
Euro-American Scum
(A poverty-stricken middle class must be a disarmed middle class)
To: cajungirl
I hear that Hershey is coming out with a new candy called
Mahatma sorry
152
posted on
07/11/2004 9:54:32 AM PDT
by
ditto h
To: Lady Jag
Avoid Indian products, kinda hard if you need tech support.
153
posted on
07/11/2004 1:04:13 PM PDT
by
Springman
(God has called Ronald Reagan home 6-5-04)
To: tapatio
154
posted on
07/11/2004 3:31:16 PM PDT
by
boop
To: muawiyah
Historically it includes Myanmar (Burma), Sri Lanka, Bengla Desh, Nepal, Kashmir,
errr.. Kashmir is part of the nation state of India.
155
posted on
07/12/2004 12:53:16 AM PDT
by
Cronos
(W2K4)
To: Dallas59
Are they gonna blow themselves up?
Nope, that's saudis, you know the folks we pay to get some oil from?
156
posted on
07/12/2004 12:55:28 AM PDT
by
Cronos
(Stop buying Saudi oil, drill Alaska!)
To: k2blader
Hope no one finds out about my pot-bellied pig, who's just a - MOHAMMAD ! ... GET OUT OF THERE! ... DON'T EAT THAT! ... MOHAMMAD!! ... DON'T MAKE ME GO OVER THERE!!! - just a real sweetie most of the time.
157
posted on
07/12/2004 1:02:53 AM PDT
by
dagnabbit
(Islamic Immigration is the West's Suicide)
To: Cronos
Not ALL of Kashmir is part of the nation calling itself "India". Some of it (78,000 sq.km. is part of the nation calling itself "Pakistan". Then there are the parts currently part of China (5,000 sq.km. contributed by Pakistan and 37,555 contributed by India itself) and Afghanistan (depending on who is drawing the lines).
The situation is actually far more complex than that, and if Tibet ever regains it's independence, Tibet and Kashmir will have overlapping claims to the same desolate mountains.
To: muawiyah
Not ALL of Kashmir is part of the nation calling itself "India". Some of it (78,000 sq.km. is part of the nation calling itself "Pakistan". Then there are the parts currently part of China (5,000 sq.km. contributed by Pakistan and 37,555 contributed by India itself) and Afghanistan (depending on who is drawing the lines).
Actually you are mixing up Kashmir withthe Indian state of JAmmus, Kashmir and Ladakh. The portion known as Kashmir is Indian with parts that were annexed by Pakistan in 1947. Ladakh was conquered in part by China during the 1962 war. Afghanistan has no claim on any part of Kashmir and doesn't touch Kashmir geographically.
The lands from India were not contributed, but "robbed"
Tibet existed as a separate nation state until 1949, so there was never a dispute about Tibet and India having overlapping claims to any territory
159
posted on
07/12/2004 5:57:04 AM PDT
by
Cronos
(W2K4!)
To: muawiyah
And here's a map to show that:
160
posted on
07/12/2004 6:01:22 AM PDT
by
Cronos
(W2K4!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161-174 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson