Posted on 07/10/2004 3:32:04 PM PDT by smonk
LANDRIEU FOLLOWS MOORE OFF THE CLIFF [07/09 07:03 PM]
Appearing on Fox News on July 8, Democratic Senator from
Louisiana Mary Landrieu endorses all of the facts in
Fahrenheit 9/11, including, presumably, the idea that the
U.S. attacked Afghanistan in order to build a natural
gas pipeline to make money for Dick Cheney:
LANDRIEU: Well, first of all, talk about security, let me
talk about the movie. If there's any senator or any
person that takes issue with anything in that movie, they
should lay their cards on the table. So far, that
movie's been out for several weeks, has grossed more
money than almost any documentary in the history, and I
haven’t seen one credible criticism that can't be backed
up with a fact so that's that on the movie.
FOX ANCHOR DAVID ASMAN: Let me stop you there. You are
saying there is nothing in the film that has not been
criticized factually?
LANDRIEU: I am saying there is a film out there, and it's
been out there for three weeks, and there is not one
criticism of that film that hasn't been backed up
substantially because of the fact checks.
what do you expect? mary has the iq of a frog. we likes our senators stupid...
Landrieu's probably boffing Moore and thinks she's lucky.
I knew from observation she was dull but, good Lord, brain damaged??
Oh, PLEASE tell me that there's either video or a replay somewhere..
no. just a louisiana democrat. i think they start em on whisky from the baby bottle. retards their brain development or something...
I've looked, but haven't found it . . . . can't even
find the transcript on the foxnews website. NRO is
the only place I've seen it.
i saw it when she said it. she's just embarassing to humankind...
I apologize for the election of both of our democrat senators. David Vitter is my representative and is running to fill the seat being vacated by John Breaux. He's a rock solid republican, and I'm praying for his victory.
Its too bad Vitter is all we've got. He is definitely no Reagan, or even Bush for that matter.
So9
Dumb as a fencepost. Remember when she stayed at Grand Isle when there was a mandatory evacuation order? She had to be rescued because she was too dumb to know that when an area floods, you can't drive out.
that's allright. I live in SC, and we kept sending fritz
"doddering old man" hollings to the senate for about a
zillion years.
you're not responsible for ALL the idiots in your state.
"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program." - President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998
"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face." - Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998
"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983." - Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998
"We urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." - Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin (D-MI), Tom Daschle (D-SD), John Kerry ( D - MA), and others Oct. 9, 1998
"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." - Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998
"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies." - Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999
"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has invigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies." - Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. BobGraham (D, FL,) and others, December 5, 2001
"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them." - Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002
"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country." - Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." - Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." - Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002
"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..." - Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002
"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force-- if necessary-- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security." - Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002
"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction." - Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002
"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do." - Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapon stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." - Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002
"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction." - Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002
"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation .. And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real." - Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003
SO NOW THESE SAME DEMOCRATS SAY PRESIDENT BUSH LIED, THAT THERE NEVER WERE ANY WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION, AND THAT HE TOOK US TO WAR UNECESSARILY !
TELL THE TRUTH ABOUT THE PRESIDENT LEADING US TO WAR!
true, he's no Reagan or Bush, but I think he'll back our great president every step of the way.
-PJ
I watched it live when it happened...it has to be out there somewhere.
No. She is in office because of the "sugar" lie.
-PJ
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.