Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fahrenheit Moore or Less
http://www.petetownshend.co.uk ^ | 7 July 2004 | Pete Townsend

Posted on 07/08/2004 7:27:46 PM PDT by Huck

Michael Moore has been making some claims – mentioning me by name - which I believe distort the truth.

He says – among other things – that I refused to allow him to use my song WON’T GET FOOLED AGAIN in his latest film, because I support the war, and that at the last minute I recanted, but he turned me down. I have never hidden the fact that at the beginning of the war in Iraq I was a supporter. But now, like millions of others, I am less sure we did the right thing.

When first approached I knew nothing about the content of his film FAHRENHEIT 911. My publisher informed me they had already refused the use of my song in principle because MIRAMAX the producers offered well below what the song normally commands for use in a movie. They asked me if I wanted to ask for more money, I told them no.

Nevertheless, as a result of my refusal to consider the use, Harvey Weinstein – a good friend of mine, and my manager Bill Curbishley – interceded personally, explained in more detail to Bill what the movie was about, and offered to raise the bid very substantially indeed. This brought the issue directly to me for the first time. Bill emailed me and told me how keen Harvey and Michael Moore were to use my song.

At this point I emailed Bill (and he may have passed the essence of what I said to Harvey Weinstein) that I had not really been convinced by BOWLING FOR COLUMBINE, and had been worried about its accuracy; it felt to me like a bullying film. Out of courtesy to Harvey I suggested that if he and Moore were determined to have me reconsider, I should at least get a chance to see a copy of the new film. I knew that with Cannes on the horizon, time was running short for them, and this might not be possible. I never received a copy of the film to view. At no time did I ask Moore or Miramax to reconsider anything. Once I had an idea what the film was about I was 90% certain my song was not right for them.

I believe that in the same email to my publisher and manager that contained this request to see the film I pointed out that WGFA is not an unconditionally anti-war song, or a song for or against revolution. It actually questions the heart of democracy: we vote heartily for leaders who we subsequently always seem to find wanting. (WGFA is a song sung by a fictional character from my 1971 script called LIFEHOUSE. The character is someone who is frightened by the slick way in which truth can be twisted by clever politicians and revolutionaries alike). I suggested in the email that they might use something by Neil Young, who I knew had written several songs of a more precise political nature, and is as accessible as I am. Moore himself takes credit for this idea, and I have no idea whether my suggestion reached him, but it was the right thing to do.

I have nothing against Michael Moore personally, and I know Roger Daltrey is a friend and fan of his, but I greatly resent being bullied and slurred by him in interviews just because he didn’t get what he wanted from me. It seems to me that this aspect of his nature is not unlike that of the powerful and wilful man at the centre of his new documentary. I wish him all the best with the movie, which I know is popular, and which I still haven’t seen. But he’ll have to work very, very hard to convince me that a man with a camera is going to change the world more effectively than a man with a guitar.

Pete


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: f911; fahrenheit911; fahrenheit911411; lyingliar; michaelmoore; michaelmoore411; michaelmoorelies; moore; moorelies; petetownshend; propagandista; rockandroll; rockmusic; thewho; townsend; who; wontgetfooledagain
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: ATOMIC_PUNK

Excellent my friend. A Picture is indeed worth a 1000 words.


21 posted on 07/09/2004 1:49:14 AM PDT by Memother
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Huck
Also here:

Fahrenheit Moore or Less (The Who's Pete Townshend Says Moore is Lying About Him Too)

22 posted on 07/09/2004 2:30:55 AM PDT by weegee (Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them. ~~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Bates

Only if you promise to continue as my sidekick.


23 posted on 07/09/2004 2:18:08 PM PDT by freekitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: PhilDragoo

Outstanding! You just know there has to be places he can't reach with a wash cloth. Oh Yuk! That`s an image you'll never get out of your head! Sorry bout that...


24 posted on 07/09/2004 3:40:12 PM PDT by RobUnger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: PhilDragoo
Thanks for the

(((PING)))
25 posted on 07/09/2004 5:43:46 PM PDT by Smartass ( BUSH & CHENEY IN 2004 - Si vis pacem, para bellum - Por el dedo de Dios se escribió.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: PhilDragoo

Oh no!! My eyes, my eyes! That gives me nightmares!


26 posted on 07/09/2004 7:39:02 PM PDT by potlatch (HECK IS WHERE PEOPLE GO WHO DON'T BELIEVE IN GOSH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson