Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Will the Breck Boy make a difference?
1 posted on 07/06/2004 7:31:49 AM PDT by Mike Bates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Mike Bates

Ho-Hum in kerry-dum, the liar takes a wife......


2 posted on 07/06/2004 7:38:39 AM PDT by Red Badger (The Army makes the world safe for democracy....The Marines make the world safe for the Army...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Bates

He does bring a pretty face to the campaign but there's nothing that differentiates him from John F*ckin'. Unlike in 1960, this is one southern Democrat who isn't a conservative. So Kerry doesn't bring ideological as well as geographical balance to the presidential ticket. That wing of the Democratic party is history. Consider some history. Fellow Massachusettan Michael Dukakis' pick of Texan Lloyd Bentsen in 1988 didn't help him carry Texas. There's no chance a Southern liberal like John Edwards can succeed where a conservative Texas Democrat like Bentsen failed.


3 posted on 07/06/2004 7:38:49 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Bates

NO difference at all. Kerry is a dangerous snob. He will do as he has said leading this nation into a cesspool:

"I'm an internationalist. I'd like to see our troops dispersed through the world only at the directive of the United Nations."


10 posted on 07/06/2004 7:50:32 AM PDT by eleni121 (Mt. Rushmore welcomes the Gipper!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Bates

Even most of the moronic lib's hate TRIAL LAWYERS because they know who is responsible that they pay $5.00 a pack for cigarettes.


11 posted on 07/06/2004 7:51:48 AM PDT by Uncle George
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Bates

Everything you didn't like about John Edwards before (trial lawyer going into elective politics, pretty-boy Southern charm boy, stealth "third-way" strategist, intellectual lightweight, sometime metrosexual, no military service, faux "good old boy" air, dabbles in psychic phenomena) are still there. He would be the "Former Occupant of the Oval Office, 1993-2001" redux, without the womanizer baggage.

Now I don't know if John Edwards does any of this womanizing thing, and I will not speculate. But the "Former Occupant of the Oval Ofice, 1993-2001" did an awful lot of wrongful things that had NOTHING to do with forcing females to do things that everybody knows were "just wrong", as it has been put. The worst thing the "Former Occupant of the Oval Ofice, 1993-2001" did was to shirk from giving full performance in the duties of President. Perhaps he simply did not know how. Given opportunities to rise above the situation and be a decisive statesman, he chose to duck and hide, and take the easy (and wrong) course of action, passing responsibility to anybody else that blame could be shucked off onto.

And we want another faint-hearted character like that a heartbeat from the Presidency? Considering the shaky state of John Kerry's health, Edwards could very well assume the mantle before the end of Kerry's first term.


18 posted on 07/06/2004 8:02:56 AM PDT by alloysteel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Bates

Kerry probably wnet with the best choice ( for HIM) out of the pack.

"Then there’s always the possibility that some skeletons will emerge from Edwards’ closet."

But will the Republicans have the savy to find them and the cojones to publicize them? Only time will tell but recent behavior by the GOP does not leave me sanguine on that possibility.


29 posted on 07/06/2004 8:18:08 AM PDT by ZULU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Bates

Once again, John F'n Kerry decides to marry the richest woman in the room. You think Edwards insisted on a pre-nup?


30 posted on 07/06/2004 8:19:24 AM PDT by bondjamesbond (Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Bates

A Pair of Gucci Loafers


36 posted on 07/06/2004 8:46:53 AM PDT by joesnuffy (Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Bates

Flush the Johns!


42 posted on 07/06/2004 12:11:41 PM PDT by Taxman (So that the beautiful pressure does not diminish!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Bates

A second Ho-Hum. Too many Ho-Hums for me this year! Richard Clarke, Ho-Hum, Bill Clinton's Summer Book Tour, Ho-Hum, Hillary Clinton, Ho-Hum, Bob Woodward, Ho-Hum,etc. Now that John Kerry is moving to the "middle", I guess Michael Moore, Harvey Weinstein and F-911 will become Ho-Hum too! Methinks the entire "traitor" Democrat Party will become Ho-Hum this November! Boring! These idiots are going down! Much ado about nothing!!!!!


43 posted on 07/06/2004 12:16:19 PM PDT by JLAGRAYFOX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Bates

Kerrys running mate John Edwards IS ....

Jimmy Carter all over again. Watch how he approaches people to greet them and shake their hands. His demeanor and all is very Jimmy Carteresque. You know darn well Kerrys camp chose Edwards in order to get the southern vote.


46 posted on 07/06/2004 1:39:24 PM PDT by SunnySide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson