Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: madprof98
$20 X 52 Weeks = $1,040 / $500,000,000 = 0.0002% of family assets. Way to go Senator!
2 posted on 07/06/2004 7:10:03 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie (Mullahs swinging from lamp posts.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Brad Cloven
20 bucks is all he gives???? This is like giving a penny for most of us! What a phony cheapskate and why is he letting people see what he gives?? Why is the Church still giving him Communion??

Pray for W and Our Shining City

17 posted on 07/06/2004 7:22:13 AM PDT by bray (Yaaaawn Tax , Tax , Tax & Kerry wants your paycheck!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Brad Cloven

effin's rationale for killing unborn babies was that due to "separation of church and state", he couldn't "impose his beliefs on Protestants or Jews". As usual, this attempt to be on all sides of every issue is completely irrational. If his argument were a viable one, he would have to apply it to other issues and people of other faiths. For instance, he would not be able to impose his views on radical islamists who believe in the "eye for an eye" adage, therefor he would have to pass legislation that allows people to chop each others hands off, or poke each other's eyes out. Also, he would have to vote to allow people to marry multiple partners, after all, who is he to tell them they can't? And let's not forget stealing, heck, if we don't listen to God's commandment "Thou shalt not steal", what reason do we have not to? Why not have a new law that says if I want it, and I saw it first, its mine. Or if I'm bigger and stronger than you, and I can take it from you, its mine.

Obviously, any civilized society's laws are based on the Big Ten given to us by God's own Hand. "Thou shalt not kill" is way near the top of the list, right after the ones about honoring, and not mocking, our Creator. If that feckless, flipflopping, disingenuous, metrosexual dandy really believed that unborn babies are babies, he would be obligated by conscience to vote to protect their unstained and innocent lives from senseless murder. And if he doesn't have a conscience, then he needs to be under the care of a psychological professional immediately, because that would mean he is a sociopath. (See description here http://home.datawest.net/esn-recovery/artcls/socio.htm - notice parallels to f'n's behaviors, at least those we have been privvy to hearing about.) Either way, his defense of his record holds no water, particularly his vote ****against**** the Laci and Connor's Law (Unborn Victims of Violence Act, I believe is the official name.) In that case, he voted to protect a felonious criminal's "right to choose", should he choose to kill a pregnant woman and her baby.

Give me a break! I think if jfk ever actually spoke the truth, his considerably large head would explode. He sickens me.


36 posted on 07/06/2004 9:42:54 AM PDT by VRWCer ("He was pierced for our transgressions... and by His stripes, we are healed." -Isaiah 53:5-6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson