Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Microsoft Plugs IE; Warns All Browsers At Risk (Test Your Browser Here)
TechWeb ^ | July 2, 2004 | Gregg Keizer

Posted on 07/03/2004 9:46:15 PM PDT by Eagle9

As if to prove the point that security is like the Dutch boy at the dike, Microsoft on Friday released a stop-gap fix for one of several vulnerabilities that have plagued its Internet Explorer just as a security firm warned that virtually every browser -- not just IE -- can be spoofed by hackers.

The update, which Microsoft tagged as “Critical,” isn't a patch per se, but rather an change to Windows that disables the ADODB.Stream object within the operating system's Data Access Components (DAC).

Last week, an innovative attack launched by a Russian hacker group from previously-infected Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) servers compromised a large number of PCs with identity- and financial information-thieving Trojan horses and key loggers. The attack exploited a pair of vulnerabilities in Internet Explorer, one of which -- ADODB -- had not been patched by Microsoft.

While the Russian Web site that hosted the malicious code -- which was surreptitiously downloaded to the compromised computers -- was taken down last Friday to remove the immediate danger, Microsoft has still not released a patch. The ADODB disabler is meant only as a temporary fix, said Microsoft, until it can permanently fix IE.

“In addition to this configuration change, Microsoft is working to provide a series of security updates to Internet Explorer in coming weeks that will provide additional protections,” said Microsoft in a statement. Microsoft did not offer up a timeline for any future IE patches, saying only that “a comprehensive update will be released once it has been thoroughly tested.”

The update to disable ADODB should be downloaded and installed by all users of Windows NT, Windows 2000, Windows XP, and Windows Server 2003, Microsoft said. It's available on the Windows Download site, or via the Windows Update

service. Windows XP Service Pack 2 (SP2), which is expected to release in final form this summer, is not susceptible to the ADODB vulnerability.

Friday's update is one of the few pieces of good news IE users have heard in the last week.

After a rash of exploits against IE vulnerabilities -- including the Web attack of last week, password-stealing Trojans, and a new way for hackers to spoof, or fake, Web sites -- some security analysts questioned whether Internet Explorer was safe enough to use.

Even the U.S. Computer Emergency Response Team (US-CERT), part of the federal government's Department of Homeland Security, recommended that users consider ditching IE for an alternate such as Mozilla or Opera.

“We're recommending one of two things,” said Thomas Kristensen, the chief technology officer at Danish security firm Secunia. “Either use Internet Explorer under very restricted security settings -- which may not be possible for all companies -- or install a different browser.”

Wednesday, Secunia issued a warning saying it had discovered a vulnerability within IE that allowed scammers to spoof, or fake, the content of a site displayed in the browser.

On Friday, however, the security vendor modified the alert to claim that virtually every browser, from Internet Explorer and Mozilla to Opera and Netscape -- including browsers for both Windows and the Mac OS -- has this flaw.

“It's not a code vulnerability,” said Secunia's Kristensen, “but a design flaw.”

The problem stems from how browsers handle frames. “Some time ago, browser designers decided that one site needed to be able to manipulate the content of another, and the functionality was adopted by everyone,” said Kristensen. But hackers can use this to inject phony content -- say their own credit card-stealing form -- into a frame of an actual trusted Web site, such as a user's online bank.

“In these times of phishing attacks and other scams, this is a problem,” said Kristensen. “You're visiting a bank or an e-commerce site, and you're certain of that site, but meanwhile, it's [actually] open in the background to content change by hackers.”

Internet Explorer users can stymie such spoofing attacks by disabling the “Navigate sub-frames across different domains” setting under Tools/Internet Options/Security.

Secunia offered up a quick test that users can run to see if their current browser is vulnerable to this problem.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; Technical
KEYWORDS: browser; getamac; ie; internetexploiter; lowqualitycrap; microsoft; patch; security; securityflaw; technology; vulnerability; vulnerable; windows
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 201-207 next last
To: Eagle9

Thanks


101 posted on 07/04/2004 9:42:17 AM PDT by Friend of thunder (No sane person wants war, but oppressors want oppression.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eagle9

Netscape 7.0 failed on my Mac OS 9 system


102 posted on 07/04/2004 9:49:12 AM PDT by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eagle9; All
Test your browser.

I did the upgrade, Critical Update for ADODB.stream (KB870669) shut down my computer, restarted it and I am still was still vulnerable. Was that wrong upgrade?

103 posted on 07/04/2004 10:08:25 AM PDT by Friend of thunder (No sane person wants war, but oppressors want oppression.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FL_engineer; All
Thanks for interpreting all of that. By that I mean, I am not anywhere even close to being an expert on this subject. I just just barely enough to read and follow instructions from people like yourself. I had read that about the LMZ last night and all I got out of it was a headache. So, I decided not to even mention it and wait for someone who knew what they doing to interpret it.

Now, I just need to go back and read your instructions again ... no, I can do that later. I'm just gonna shutdown the computer, enjoy the day, and come back tonight or tomorrow. Again, thank you.

_________________________________________________________________

To everyone else: I posted this article for informative purposes only, and am not a technical expert. If you have technical questions, I can only suggest that you ask any those FReepers on this thread that are giving advice.

104 posted on 07/04/2004 10:23:58 AM PDT by Eagle9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Eagle9
Every browser that I have on my Virtual PC partition was vulnerable and every browser, except Firefox 0.9.1, on the Mac was vulnerable. The old version of Firefox (0.8) was vulnerable. I have always liked Firefox (by whatever name it has gone by). It's interesting to note that a version 0.9 of a publicly supported browser is more secure than a version 5.x of a Microsloth browser.

I normally use Safari as my primary browser, but I use Firefox a lot, as my secondary browser. The only reason that I use Safari as my primary browser is because of it's lightning speed in loading complex pages. I'll just switch around for a few weeks. In fact, if 0.9.1 continues to be as good as it looks, I may not switch back.

Microsloth's attention to security has always been so poor that the only reason that I even have Internet Exploder on my computer, is for testing the appearance and functionality web pages that I have just produced and even then, I close the app immediately after testing.

Netscape used to be a very fine browser, but Firefox has left them in the dust. Camino and Opera are promising, but they still have a long way to go.

For now, FIREFOX RULES!

105 posted on 07/04/2004 10:29:28 AM PDT by Action-America (Best President: Reagan * Worst President: Klinton * Worst GOP President: Dubya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Friend of thunder
See my post #104. I suggest you ask FL_engineer , or any of the others on this thread who know a lot about these tech subjects.
106 posted on 07/04/2004 10:30:44 AM PDT by Eagle9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: octobersky
Read why IE should be abondoned altogether:

http://channels.lockergnome.com/news/archives/20040615_why_you_should_dump_internet_explorer.phtml

107 posted on 07/04/2004 10:33:15 AM PDT by Swanks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: FL_engineer
LOL ! (at myself)     I left a couple of words out of my post to you, but I think you'll still get the gist of it.
108 posted on 07/04/2004 10:43:49 AM PDT by Eagle9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Action-America
Microsloth's attention to security has always been so poor that the only reason that I even have Internet Exploder on my computer, is for testing the appearance and functionality web pages that I have just produced and even then, I close the app immediately after testing.

I do the same thing with IE. I like FireFox 0.9.1.

109 posted on 07/04/2004 10:49:11 AM PDT by Eagle9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Eagle9

Thank you, I did not expect tech support just thought I would ask in case you knew. Thanks again.


110 posted on 07/04/2004 11:02:52 AM PDT by Friend of thunder (No sane person wants war, but oppressors want oppression.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: general_re

Thanks!

Your advice in post #37 worked, at least against the test site!


111 posted on 07/04/2004 11:14:38 AM PDT by Ethrane ("semper consolar")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: TenthAmendmentChampion
TenthAmendmentChampion, pardon the off-thread note, but seeing your screen-name makes me think that you might be interested in this article - http://www.ActionAmerica.org/constitution/amend10.html

It's a few years old, but still applies.

Now back to your regularly scheduled thread.

112 posted on 07/04/2004 11:17:21 AM PDT by Action-America (Best President: Reagan * Worst President: Klinton * Worst GOP President: Dubya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: octobersky

Mozilla Firebird fails.


113 posted on 07/04/2004 11:22:42 AM PDT by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: LTCJ
I had been using Firebird (v0.7 ?) - it failed. Just "upgraded" to Firefox - OK now.

Got a link for an update site?

114 posted on 07/04/2004 11:25:05 AM PDT by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: general_re

Big thanks from me and the IE browser. Any suggestions for NS v7.1?

It doesn't seem to have all those options at either Tools or Edit > Preferences, as IE does.


115 posted on 07/04/2004 11:37:51 AM PDT by 7.62 x 51mm (• Veni • Vidi • Vino •)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: WestVirginiaRebel

"... Incompetent Explorer ..."

I seem to Incontinent Explorer on the office machine.


116 posted on 07/04/2004 11:41:30 AM PDT by 7.62 x 51mm (• Veni • Vidi • Vino •)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Principled

Mozilla Firefox passes.

g :0)


117 posted on 07/04/2004 11:42:23 AM PDT by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: swilhelm73

Iuse Netscape 7.1 and though I can't seem to get logged on my Netscape account right now it still don't give me the problems that IE does.


118 posted on 07/04/2004 11:52:38 AM PDT by pctech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

My, my, Bush 2000 does have an attitudinal problem, doesn't he? Was he once suspended and recently reinstated or something?


119 posted on 07/04/2004 11:58:21 AM PDT by 7.62 x 51mm (• Veni • Vidi • Vino •)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: 7.62 x 51mm

Unfortunately, I haven't used NS since 6.2, and I honestly don't remember if there's a user-accessible setting for this - I don't think there is - so the only advice I can give is the not-very-helpful "switch"... ;)


120 posted on 07/04/2004 11:59:49 AM PDT by general_re (Drive offensively - the life you save may be your own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 201-207 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson