Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nader accuses Democrats of 'dirty tricks'
AP | 7/02/04 | WILL LESTER

Posted on 07/02/2004 12:13:00 PM PDT by kattracks

WASHINGTON (AP) - Independent candidate Ralph Nader, denied a spot on the Arizona ballot, on Friday accused the Democrats and presidential candidate John Kerry of engaging in political "dirty tricks."

Just hours before the developments in Arizona, Nader complained that the Democratic Party has "stepped up its obstruction tendencies" in challenging his ballot access. The consumer advocate said he had called the Kerry campaign three times Thursday, asking to chat with the candidate.

"We have to get a clarification if they're going to engage in dirty tricks," Nader told reporters at a news conference to criticize multinational corporations.

The Kerry campaign dismissed Nader's complaints, arguing that Democrats were following the rules when they legally challenged Nader's signatures to get on the ballot. "These are rules that have been on the books for years and they ought to be followed," said Chad Clanton, who added that the Massachusetts senator would be happy to talk to Nader.

In Arizona, supporters of Nader abandoned their effort to get the independent candidate on the presidential ballot after Democrats challenged the validity of thousands of signatures.

Nader's campaign had submitted more than 22,000 signatures to Arizona election officials June 9 ? far more than the 14,694 valid signatures required by state law to compete against President Bush and Kerry.

Two Democratic voters had filed a lawsuit last week, backed by the Arizona Democratic Party, questioning the validity of Nader's nominating petitions and other documents. The Democrats argued that more than 70 percent of the signatures were invalid.

As a Maricopa County Superior Court judge prepared to hear arguments in the case, Nader campaign attorney Richard Mahrle conceded there were "technical errors" in the ballot petition and said Nader would not contest the lawsuit.

Judge Mark Armstrong then issued an order that Nader be kept off the state ballot.

Nader told reporters that he expects to get on about as many state ballots as he did in 2000 when his name was listed in 43 states and the District of Columbia. So far, he has not gotten on any ballot independently. Nader acknowledged that complex state laws on ballot access could result in additional challenges.

"These statutes are so complex the secretary of states often don't know what they mean, so they are inviting targets for litigation," Nader said. "Democrats have an endless amount of money to throw against our efforts to get on the ballot."

Nader and Kerry met in May, with the two offering compliments following the session. Whatever truce existed was clearly gone on Friday as Nader campaign spokesman Kevin Zeese warned Democrats about future ballot challenges.

"John Kerry may be making an enemy of Ralph Nader if he doesn't stop the harassment," Zeese said. "We've been focusing our criticism on Bush rather than Kerry, but Kerry has a pretty lousy record himself."

Democratic National Committee spokesman Jano Cabrera said Friday that the national party supports efforts by state parties to validate Nader signatures, but it is not providing resources to help state parties in that effort.

"We feel that no matter how small a percentage of the vote he is drawing, he is drawing that support from John Kerry. A vote for Nader is a vote for Bush," Cabrera said.

Many Democrats blame Nader, the Green Party candidate four years ago, for taking votes from Democrat Al Gore and helping ensure President Bush's election.

Nader has struggled in some states to collect the thousands of signatures necessary to appear on the ballot as an independent candidate. He suffered a setback last week when the Green Party, which has ballot lines in 22 states and the District of Columbia, declined to endorse him.

Nader has been endorsed by the Reform Party, which has ballot lines in at least seven states.



TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004election; 2004electionfraud; 2004votefraud; ballotaccess; dems; dirtypolitics; dirtytricks; election2004; kerrycampaign; nader; nadervoters; ralphnader; rattricks; runnaderrun
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

1 posted on 07/02/2004 12:13:01 PM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Click The Logo to Donate Click The Logo To Donate


2 posted on 07/02/2004 12:17:44 PM PDT by Brad’s Gramma (Make Hillary happy.... IGNORE the Freepathon!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
DemocRATs pulling dirty tricks?

Nah, couldn't be.

3 posted on 07/02/2004 12:17:49 PM PDT by Joe Brower (The Constitution defines Conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Where does the 'rat party get off obstructing Nader's or anyone else's right to be on any state's ballot-that is worse than dirty dealing. Too bad if they don't like him-I hope he sues the Kerry campaign.


4 posted on 07/02/2004 12:19:03 PM PDT by Texan5 (You've got to saddle up your boys, you've got to draw a hard line)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Maybe he should call the UN to keep the rats off his back.


5 posted on 07/02/2004 12:20:16 PM PDT by cripplecreek (you tell em i'm commin.... and hells commin with me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Two Democratic voters had filed a lawsuit last week, backed by the Arizona Democratic Party, questioning the validity of Nader's nominating petitions and other documents.

Umm ... Do we know who these people were?

6 posted on 07/02/2004 12:21:19 PM PDT by Mo1 (I'm a monthly Donor ... You can be one too!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Dear Ralph;
At least they pulled their "courtroom hat trick" BEFORE the
election with you, whereas they did it AFTER the election
with me.

Your pal,
W


7 posted on 07/02/2004 12:21:55 PM PDT by smonk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower
"These are rules that have been on the books for years and they ought to be followed," said Chad Clanton,

NJ Senate Race: Toricelli...Laughtenberg

8 posted on 07/02/2004 12:22:56 PM PDT by Go Gordon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Also in the news, Ralph Nader declares that "Grass is green!"


9 posted on 07/02/2004 12:23:24 PM PDT by FormerLib (Kosova: "land stolen from Serbs and given to terrorist killers in a futile attempt to appease them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

let the dem's waste their efforts in AZ.
They should already know Bush will win that state anyway!


10 posted on 07/02/2004 12:23:46 PM PDT by Legion04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Bush haters who want the war stopped have only one candidate: Nader. I remind my liberal friends of this, explaining that a vote for Kerry is a vote to keep the war going just as Bush is doing.

I tell them to vote their convictions, vote Nader. Moore campaigned for Nader in 2000. They melt like the wicked witch at Nader's mention.

It's fun. Keep Nader in the race.


11 posted on 07/02/2004 12:26:29 PM PDT by moodyskeptic (www.WinWithHumor.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"These are rules that have been on the books for years and they ought to be followed,"

Like the 2000 FL election laws the Rats violated?

12 posted on 07/02/2004 12:27:12 PM PDT by ServesURight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

"Dirty Tricks" = McAuliffe's middle name.


13 posted on 07/02/2004 12:28:00 PM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The Kerry campaign dismissed Nader's complaints, arguing that Democrats were following the rules when they legally challenged Nader's signatures to get on the ballot. "These are rules that have been on the books for years and they ought to be followed," said Chad Clanton, who added that the Massachusetts senator would be happy to talk to Nader.

Just like the rules about what constitutes a valid vote in Florida. Oh wait, not those rules…

14 posted on 07/02/2004 12:29:23 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texan5

Agreed


15 posted on 07/02/2004 12:32:36 PM PDT by My Favorite Headache (Rush 30th Anniversary Tour Tickets On Sale Now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Welcome to reality, Mr. Nader. That's what RATS are all about.


16 posted on 07/02/2004 12:33:04 PM PDT by NRA2BFree (Life is not about how fast you run, or how high you climb, but how well you bounce.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun

Bend over Ralph and grab tour ankles here comes your friends the DNC.


17 posted on 07/02/2004 12:33:11 PM PDT by jocko12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

Her Most Royal Highness:"Use the stolen FBI files from Arizona and our Judges and end this, now."

18 posted on 07/02/2004 12:42:58 PM PDT by Diogenesis (We do only what we are meant to do)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

If Ralph Nader wants to learn all the tricks that the Democrats use to keep candidates off of primary and general election ballots, he should sit down and talk with Lyndon Larouche...


19 posted on 07/02/2004 12:46:34 PM PDT by weegee (Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them. ~~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moodyskeptic

Read the Kerry quotes from 1997 ("Why we fight") near the top of my profile page and share them with your liberal friends.

You could probably share those quotes (without date or attribute) and ask them if they could support a candidate who would make such bold comments including asserting that the US does not need UN approval to go to war or even to have all nations support a US military action against Iraq.


20 posted on 07/02/2004 12:49:50 PM PDT by weegee (Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them. ~~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson