Skip to comments.
Speed of light may have changed recently
New Scientist ^
| 6/30/04
| Eugenie Samuel Reich
Posted on 06/30/2004 1:35:28 PM PDT by NukeMan
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 261-264 next last
To: NukeMan
"String theory seemed too far from experiment. He suspected that the string theorists were not trying hard enough to prove themselves wrong"
Gleick on Richard P. Feynman
To: COUNTrecount
The Oklo reactor started up nearly two billion years ago when groundwater filtered through crevices in the rocks and mixed with uranium ore to trigger a fission reaction that was sustained for hundreds of thousands of years. -Eugenie Samuel ReichHey, I didn't know there had been a natural fission reactor. What a gyp!
To: NukeMan
Now Bush is screwing up the environment and changing the speed of light!
To: NukeMan
A varying speed of light contradicts Einstein's theory of relativity, Maybe not. IIRC, Einstein just postulated that nothing can move faster than the speed of light. Actually he postulated that the speed of light is the same for all observers, regardless of their relative motion. The rest followed from that assumption.
84
posted on
06/30/2004 2:17:57 PM PDT
by
El Gato
(Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
To: Shryke
4004 BC + 2004 AD = 6008 years.
Looser!
;^)
85
posted on
06/30/2004 2:18:10 PM PDT
by
null and void
(The light pours out of me/It jerks out of me/Like blood/In this still life/Heart beats up love)
To: NutCrackerBoy
There have been more than one. There was another in what is now called Brazil.
86
posted on
06/30/2004 2:18:22 PM PDT
by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
To: Blood of Tyrants
Faster. I used to see just a little bit of darkness when opening the door, but now it seems to be instantly light. Someone tried telling me that the light always stays on, but I'm not that dumb.
87
posted on
06/30/2004 2:18:31 PM PDT
by
Cap Huff
To: Shryke
Ahem. Nothing existed 6000 years ago, Mr. Beelzebub. Can "nothing" actually "exist", or does it just sort of non-exist?
88
posted on
06/30/2004 2:19:19 PM PDT
by
Ichneumon
("...she might as well have been a space alien." - Bill Clinton, on Hillary, "My Life", p. 182)
To: Ichneumon
Can "nothing" actually "exist", or does it just sort of non-exist? Nothing definitely exists. I've got quite a bit of it in my pocket.
89
posted on
06/30/2004 2:21:05 PM PDT
by
PatrickHenry
(Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas.)
To: Ichneumon
Can "nothing" actually "exist", or does it just sort of non-exist?Nobody knows the answer (of course, he's the only one who would.)
90
posted on
06/30/2004 2:21:14 PM PDT
by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
To: VadeRetro
The important thing is that science has changed its story again, thus proving right all the people who say science is wrong. Hardly, that is the nature of science. New observations contradict old theories and lead, eventually, to new ones. The important thing is the observations.
91
posted on
06/30/2004 2:21:21 PM PDT
by
El Gato
(Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
To: COUNTrecount
A fascinating experiment, but when we had to do it in Physics lab, they never labeled the frequency on the microwave unit, so we had to ask the lab T.A., Kenneth...
92
posted on
06/30/2004 2:21:29 PM PDT
by
mikrofon
(Not a physicist, but played one at a university for a year or so)
To: Doctor Stochastic
There have been more than one [natural fission reactor]. There was another in what is now called Brazil.Thanks, Dr. Stochastic! Did you also know geckos reproduce parthenogenetically?
To: The_Victor
Bump for a later read when I have time to think.Calvin and Hobbes are laying on small hill on a warm afernoon, lazily watching the clouds drift by.
Hobbes: "I just lay here and think and think...and then I wake up."
94
posted on
06/30/2004 2:24:02 PM PDT
by
yankeedame
("Born with the gift of laughter & a sense that the world was mad.")
To: null and void
Looser! Ahh! Ahh! Personal attack! Vitriol! DAMN you tree-worshipping heathens to HELL! I'm not looser!
It's also a known fact that I win the debate when you misspell "loser", despite your false, unprovable, devil "math".
As I often tell PatrickHenry: FEEL the burn of my scalding, undefeatable logic!
95
posted on
06/30/2004 2:25:10 PM PDT
by
Shryke
(Never retreat. Never explain. Get it done and let them howl.)
To: Shryke
FEEL the burn of my scalding, undefeatable logic!Yow!
To: Poohbah
Two billion years ago, the interstellar highway patrol were a lot more strict.But now, thanks to the Supreme Court....
97
posted on
06/30/2004 2:28:05 PM PDT
by
yankeedame
("Born with the gift of laughter & a sense that the world was mad.")
To: Shryke
As I often tell PatrickHenry: FEEL the burn of my scalding, undefeatable logic! Logic is the devil's tool. I am impervious to its effects.
98
posted on
06/30/2004 2:28:12 PM PDT
by
PatrickHenry
(Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas.)
To: Ichneumon
Can "nothing" actually "exist", or does it just sort of non-exist?Um, that's a toughie. I don't have my required amoount of JB to correctly answer that question. Therefore, I'll settle for labeling you a.....blasphemer!
Take that.
99
posted on
06/30/2004 2:28:22 PM PDT
by
Shryke
(Never retreat. Never explain. Get it done and let them howl.)
To: PatrickHenry
I think he deduced it as a consequence of Maxwell's equations. While you can deduce the speed of light from Maxwell's equations, it's something of a trick, and doesn't get into the notion that it must be the same for all observers regardless of relative motion. Eisten started with the speed of light being constant for all observers, and deduced that is was also the maxium possible speed, and that E=mc2. The observations that suggested this assumption were the Michelson-Morely eperiments that attempted to deduce the "true" motion of the earth through the "ether" by measuring differences in the speed of light in different directions. No difference was found.
100
posted on
06/30/2004 2:28:28 PM PDT
by
El Gato
(Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 261-264 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson