Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MEDIA SUING TO OPEN KERRY'S SEALED DIVORCE PAPERS
AM 570 WMCA - NY ^ | 6.30.2004

Posted on 06/29/2004 8:31:10 AM PDT by KMC1

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 next last
To: KMC1

Its about time.

I find it wrong to open sealed records, but if it was done to one candidate, than it must be done to another. Why is it of public concern for a congressional candidate, yet not for a presidental candidate?

It is stooping to the dims level, but sometimes you must.


21 posted on 06/29/2004 8:42:08 AM PDT by backinthefold (9/11 changed me, and I will never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeeperFreeper

Only Republican divorce cases or DWI cases may be opened to the media. It's like Teresa's tax return. Not to be made public.


22 posted on 06/29/2004 8:42:11 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
"This is really none of my business and I see no reason for the state to be opening records of private citizens against their wishes. Even idiot private citizens."

I believe, should you check, parts, or all, of divorce records are public information.

At least those parts of a divorce that are litigated before a judge.

You may not wish to be aware of the information, as it may, or may not, relate to a candidate for public office, but I dare say there are others that do.

23 posted on 06/29/2004 8:42:15 AM PDT by G.Mason (A war mongering, red white and blue, military industrial complex, Al Qaeda incinerating American.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nuffsenuff
I think they should have let the media do it without prodding from any political figures.

And you managed to keep a straight face delivering the punch line...My hat is off to you, FRiend.

24 posted on 06/29/2004 8:42:15 AM PDT by L,TOWM (From the "Party of Jefferson" to the "Party of Shmeagle" in less than 200 years...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker

The former Mrs Ryan! Mamma mia! She is hot hot hot! Seven of Nine? I give her a Ten of Ten!


25 posted on 06/29/2004 8:42:34 AM PDT by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: KMC1
Divorce proceedings are public record. That's why permission from the judge is needed to have them sealed. Politics, hidden under the guise of the media's plea of "public has a right to know", stinks. But none on the RAT side squawked when it was happening to Jack Ryan.

Like the Office of Independent Council law, the RATS never squawked about it, until it was used against x42i.
26 posted on 06/29/2004 8:42:54 AM PDT by stylin19a (parking on the curb is not off-roading)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07

But Kerry is not a private citizen. He's a public servant and could be one who governs us all.


27 posted on 06/29/2004 8:43:44 AM PDT by rvoitier (There's too many ALs in this world: AL Qaeda AL Jezeera AL Gore AL Sharpton AL Franken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: laotzu
...this is wrong.
As we say down here: "yep, show nuff".
28 posted on 06/29/2004 8:44:23 AM PDT by GrandEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

IllinoisLeader.com plans to sue for Kerry divorce records

Posted on 06/25/2004 2:31:12 PM PDT by Mini-14

This afternoon, Leader Media President Dan Proft announced that IllinoisLeader.com plans to file suit to obtain Massachusetts' Senator John Kerry's, the presumptive Democrat nominee for President, sealed divorce records from his first marriage to Julia Thorne which was later annulled.

29 posted on 06/29/2004 8:44:33 AM PDT by george wythe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: KMC1

Go baby go!

What's good for the goose...


30 posted on 06/29/2004 8:44:44 AM PDT by jmstein7 (A Judge not bound to the original meaning of the Constitution interprets nothing but his own mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VisualizeSmallerGovernment
Dan Proft, President of Leader Media, and former advisor to former Senate Candidate Jack Ryan

The headline is false. It's isn't 'The Media' suing for opening Kerry's records, it's Jack Ryan's former advisor suing. So Ryan got caught with his pants down so he is going after someone else's divorce records. I seriously doubt that Kerry was taking his first wife to sex clubs and trying to get her to have sex in front of strangers.

This move is almost psychotic and makes Ryan and/or his advisor look like petty fools.

31 posted on 06/29/2004 8:45:06 AM PDT by Hillary's Lovely Legs (I am trying to stop an outbreak here and you're driving the monkey to the airport.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: L,TOWM

(Bows)

Thank you.


32 posted on 06/29/2004 8:45:14 AM PDT by nuffsenuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a

I agree Divorce proceedings are public records - it's done all the time with celebrities but I don't see any need to do this. What is it going to accomplish? The American people get turned off by this kind of stuff during an election year.


33 posted on 06/29/2004 8:45:14 AM PDT by areafiftyone (Democrats = the hamster is dead but the wheel is still spinning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: RightthinkinAmerican
That's what they want you to think...

Thanks for the insinuation that I think what they want me to think.

It is wrong based on principle. There's a bad word you can have fun with at my expense.

Please; praise the pragmatism of socialism, and ridicule the principles of decency.

34 posted on 06/29/2004 8:45:18 AM PDT by laotzu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: KMC1

Just another thing Republicans will be beat up over -- just watch! I can hear the talking points now.


35 posted on 06/29/2004 8:45:31 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KMC1

Theres no guarentee that they will even find anything of substance. I think there is more traction to be gained if the request is denied. If it is made public that Ryans files were opened and JF'nK's were denied, it will make people distrust the liberal judges/media even more - and hopefully add to the distain of Ketchup boy.


36 posted on 06/29/2004 8:47:27 AM PDT by thepatriot1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker

How would you like to be their kid when he looks at his friend's locker at school and sees that pic of his mom there.....And they are worried about court records bothering him. These parents need to be replaced.


37 posted on 06/29/2004 8:48:19 AM PDT by Pure Country
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Pure Country

Hell. You should see the pictures I chose not to post!


38 posted on 06/29/2004 8:51:11 AM PDT by NativeNewYorker (Don't blame me. I voted for Sharpton.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: RightthinkinAmerican
If Ryan's records were their business, this is our business. Fire with fire. Dirty bastards ruin Ryan and now they want to get sanctimonious.

Once again I see the conservatives amongst us getting all noble and wishy-washy. This is NOT the way to go.

The Dems are waging an all-out war and we're gonna sit around and wallow in our nobility?

Or maybe the Repubs will get so fed up they'll start cursing in the senate and such?

The ONLY way to stop their dirty wars is to, as the poster says above, fight fire with fire. When they realize two can play their games, maybe everyone will back off.

I am a former Democrat and knew how to rig a voting machine when I was 8 years old. LEARN!

39 posted on 06/29/2004 8:51:17 AM PDT by Fishtalk (Once a liberal and victim of all the spin. Ask me to interpret.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7
"What's good for the goose..."

Exactly what I was thinking.

40 posted on 06/29/2004 8:52:18 AM PDT by georgiadevildog (Get to work. You aren't being paid to believe in the power of your dreams.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson