To: SlickWillard; Miss Marple; PhiKapMom
Gosh, a negative article about the GOP by Bob Novak. Who'd a thunk it?!?
3 posted on
06/28/2004 9:31:33 AM PDT by
Coop
(Freedom isn't free)
To: Coop
Actually, this one doesn't seem to be negative to the GOP to me.
If just the idea that Republicans are starting to get in the mood to fight back (finally), well, I no longer see that as a negative.
Qwinn
6 posted on
06/28/2004 9:36:20 AM PDT by
Qwinn
To: Coop
It's not negative about the GOP? Did you read it? He's just stating facts: there is a division within the party on certain subjects.
I fail to see how speaking out about politics turns a church into a for-profit organization. Same goes for other non-profits. It's absurd that they are muzzled.
10 posted on
06/28/2004 9:50:50 AM PDT by
The Ghost of FReepers Past
(Legislatures are so outdated. If you want real political victory, take your issue to court.)
To: Coop
I meant to say it is NOT negative about the GOP!!!!! rather than "?". LOL! Punctuation makes a difference.
13 posted on
06/28/2004 9:53:17 AM PDT by
The Ghost of FReepers Past
(Legislatures are so outdated. If you want real political victory, take your issue to court.)
To: Coop
Why can't we muzzle the "reverend" jackson?
20 posted on
06/28/2004 10:08:16 AM PDT by
ampat
To: Coop
I am just shocked at Novak -- just shocked! (sarcasm) What I would be shocked at is if he wrote a positive article! :)
38 posted on
06/28/2004 3:06:33 PM PDT by
PhiKapMom
(AOII Mom -- Oklahoma is Reagan Country and now Bush Country -- Win Another One for the Gipper!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson