Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Los Angeles Times Cuts About 160 Jobs
Los Angeles Times ^ | June 22, 04 | Times Staff Writer

Posted on 06/22/2004 11:40:01 AM PDT by churchillbuff

Faced with lower than expected advertising revenue, the Los Angeles Times said Monday that it had cut about 160 jobs at the newspaper.

About 60 of those positions were held by reporters and others in the editorial operations of the Tribune Co.-owned paper — two-thirds of whom took a voluntary buyout. The business operations at The Times, meanwhile, lost about 100 positions.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Front Page News; US: California
KEYWORDS: lat; layoffs; media
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last
To: jveritas

hahahaaahahahahaaa


21 posted on 06/22/2004 12:02:42 PM PDT by TalonDJ (need more caffeeeeen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff

I hope that rag takes the same flight path of Air America... crash and burn, baby. Crash and burn!


22 posted on 06/22/2004 12:03:39 PM PDT by InsensitiveConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


"About 60 of those positions were held by reporters and others in the editorial operations"

Who needs them when it's easier to just make shite up???

23 posted on 06/22/2004 12:06:58 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist ©®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff

24 posted on 06/22/2004 12:07:34 PM PDT by Interesting Times (ABCNNBCBS -- yesterday's news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan

Let's have a party.

My 23 year old son and I were talking about the commie media last night. My boy is to the right of his old man, which is saying something.

His observation was that Clinton and Gore are the ones who let the internet genie out of the bottle, and now it's destroying the liberals' iron monopoly on information. Once people are allowed two choices and one of them is logical, it's all over for the libs. We are winning, folks.


25 posted on 06/22/2004 12:08:01 PM PDT by Luke21 (Christ is wonderful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff

Go see Cal, Go see Cal, Go see Cal...


26 posted on 06/22/2004 12:12:09 PM PDT by Old Professer (Interests in common are commonly abused.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff

I'm actually shedding tears over this news. Tears of laughter.


27 posted on 06/22/2004 12:12:16 PM PDT by Paul Atreides (Didn't your father tell you that unnecessary excerpting will make you go blind?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002
This is what happens when you only report the liberal side of the news, you lose half your customers.

That's what passes for liberal "economic theory." Naturally they probably want the taxpayers to make up their profit shortfall. Think of a World Without the L.A. Times.

28 posted on 06/22/2004 12:14:29 PM PDT by Bernard Marx (Is Karl Marx's grave a Communist plot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Luke21

T.V. was the death blow, they've been running on car ads since; soon, legal notices will be their only source of income.


29 posted on 06/22/2004 12:15:43 PM PDT by Old Professer (Interests in common are commonly abused.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day

Once I figured out it was a shad, not a trout, it was easy.


30 posted on 06/22/2004 12:15:51 PM PDT by Bernard Marx (Is Karl Marx's grave a Communist plot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
And the rejoicing of more job losses continues. Guess there are idiots who believe that an employee of the LA Times must in fact be a liberal.

If employees of the Wall Street Journal get fired, these same idiots will believe the fired were conservatives and be saddened.

31 posted on 06/22/2004 12:15:52 PM PDT by sakic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
Los Angeles Times Cuts About 160 Jobs

The LA Times will have an editorial tomorrow blaming Bush.

32 posted on 06/22/2004 12:15:52 PM PDT by b4its2late (John Kerry changes positions more often than a Nevada prostitute!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day

Once I figured out it was a shad, not a trout, it was easy. Good one!


33 posted on 06/22/2004 12:16:26 PM PDT by Bernard Marx (Is Karl Marx's grave a Communist plot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
Aw, that is too bad. I guess the Arnold S. & George W. bashing decisions in the editorial board hurt the bottom line.

I wonder if any of the jackals in that room are taking a pay cut. Probably not.

34 posted on 06/22/2004 12:16:30 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat (I'm so glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Does anyone know if the LAtimes is caught up in the circulation inflation scandal?


35 posted on 06/22/2004 12:18:54 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sakic
I don't believe the cheering is for the lost jobs, I believe the lost advetising revenue hence readership is the reason for rejoicing. Hopefully, if there is a more conservative leaning paper in lala land, they will pick up the slack.

Sure, it'll translate into jobs, but the same will happen at the NY Times. But the NY Post will be picking up the slack since their ad revenue and circulation is increasing.

36 posted on 06/22/2004 12:18:56 PM PDT by b4its2late (John Kerry changes positions more often than a Nevada prostitute!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day

lol


37 posted on 06/22/2004 12:18:56 PM PDT by SupplySider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Bernard Marx
Thanks!

CD

38 posted on 06/22/2004 12:24:49 PM PDT by Constitution Day (Burger-Eating War Monkey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff

"About 60 of those positions were held by reporters and others in the editorial operations of the Tribune Co.-owned paper — two-thirds of whom took a voluntary buyout. The business operations at The Times, meanwhile, lost about 100 positions."

Gee, what do you think happens when you print what the AP, Reuters and Al Jazera writes word for word? No need for all those high priced propagandists, errr journalists.


39 posted on 06/22/2004 12:25:09 PM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (How can you trust a man who will not risk his own Senate seat for a run at the presidency?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
I've got the answer, LA Times! I've got it! Listen to me, I have the solution! Are you ready?

Go even further left! Go all the way! Let it all hang out! You'll see your circulation go through the roof!

You're welcome.

(steely)

40 posted on 06/22/2004 12:27:48 PM PDT by Steely Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson