Posted on 06/22/2004 11:01:17 AM PDT by kattracks
KANDAHAR, Afghanistan, June 22 (Reuters) - Afghan soldiers beheaded four Taliban fighters after guerrillas cut off the heads of an Afghan interpreter for U.S.-led forces and an Afghan soldier, a government commander said on Tuesday.The interpreter and the soldier were beheaded after becoming separated from a patrol of Afghan and U.S.-led foreign troops in the Arghandab district of Zabul province on Monday night, Namatullah Tokhi, commander of the government's 27th division in the province, told Reuters.
He said government troops later captured and killed four Taliban guerrillas in the same way. "They cut of their heads with a knife, so when our forces arrested four Taliban, we cut off their heads too."
Intimidating the terrorists is not on ajs playlist.
"This is all Bush's, Cheney's and Ashworth's fault."
Yeah, Ashworth, acronym for Ashley Longworth, he was Miss Emily's long ago suitor on "The Walton's" the guy liked the receipt. He would make a good Att. General too!
1 Week to go boys! Light em up.
The raghead islamofascist terrorists have just opened the largest can of Whoop Ass seen in the history of this planet!
Get ready to meet Satan, a$$holes!
Lets have some fun with this..The ones with the most beheaded muslim terrorists wins.
"However, silly comments like yours insult our anti-Isllamic allies who wear turbans. We're in a war with a cult not an ethnicity"
You think wearing a turban has anything to do with "ethnicity"? Who's making the silly comments again?
Hey now, I live downwind of that, and its summertime here. Last thing I need is reeky noggin stink gently wafting through my whole life. Load 'em up into a dump truck and drop 'em off in the town square in Fallujia, or let the Afghanis play Buzkashi with them or make a headalanche down a mountainside or use 'em for batting practice or raffle 'em off to the German weirdos that keep popping up in the news or give them to New Guinea tribesmen as foreign aid.
I understand and generally agree with the Christian sentiments that were expressed by another poster earlier. The hard, cold fact however, is that it was proven by the Soviets in the 70s that this crap stops when it's the terrorslime's turn. They love to dish it out, but they're scared merdeless of it being done to them. One Sov got grabbed and cut up in Lebanon or someplace. The GRU or somebody grabbed a few of these people and disassembled them with power tools, and boxed them up for return to where they came from. End of THAT little tactic.
These people are THICK. That's what it takes to get the message across. We'll continue to see this stuff happening until it is countered with a bonce for a bonce.
Don't cha think?
A friend of mine who helped to teach the Flying Tigers ended up later flying the Hump over Burma.
When they set up the airfield, the Japanese made life misearable for them.
Harry said these little guys came in. Each night they went out on patrol with their funny little knives. The day after, there was less of a problem from the Japanese. After a few weeks, the air base had a safe perimeter.
"I wonder if the Taliban will behead any more captured Afghans."
I believe you are on to something.
"Mohammadanism is nothing more than an organized criminal activity masqueradng as a religion."
Says it all. Nothing more, nothing less. Read the biography of the 'prophet' to understand. See my tagline.
Excellent, we can't do it so I'm sure glad they can and did!
bttt
Ya, NICE. Slaves in paradise never hurt. Right jihad warrior?
You guys ever hear that two wrongs don't make a right
I'm looking hard to find a second wrong. What's wrong with killing vermin?
Hmmm...which is worse, the tit for tat barbaric beheadings, or the barbaric cheering them on in this thread?
What's worse is not knowing the difference, or that there is a difference. What's worse is not wanting evil answered in the only manner evil can be answered. What's worse is feeling compassion for the perpetrators of evil, and being hostile to the ones who punish the evil doer.
Allahu Fubar!
Why would we want that? The Taliban choppers got chopped in return. End of story, happy ending.
Riley: "These people are THICK. That's what it takes to get the message across."
Eggsackly! I have long advocated turning Ashcanistan/Iwreck into one big glass parking lot, then turn to the next tin-can towel head and asking, "Who's next". The reason for this is that *that* is all they can understand. The cannot comprehend anything except absolute, overwhelming violence being visited upon them.
For the few "pacifist" posters who bemoan this mistreatment ('tit for tat') of the poor widdle terrorists, all I can do is paraphrase a story I heard when I was working in the EMS field (many years ago).
There was a bleeding heart liberal, socialist sociologist at some ivory tower university back on the east coast who loudly proclaimed how badly the police were treating the criminals, beating them and acting aggressively toward them, instead of entering into a dialog with them and discussing their (the criminal's) wrongful behavior and how it reflected badly upon them and demeaned society, etc., ad nauseating etc.
So the local police force, who were part of the brunt of this idjit's diatribes, invited him to go out with them on a 'ride along' and just show them exactly how the police should respond properly.
Long story short, they responded to an altercation in a bar and instead of physically interposing themselves by way of nightsticks into the argument, offered to let Mr. Social Conscience show them how to "talk" to the poor downtrodden, mistreated miscreants and handle it *his* way. After a few minutes of attempting to "discuss" with them their feelings and motivations, one of the miscreants got a bit tired of his BS and smacked him in the face, sending him flying backwards down on his sorry @$$ on the floor.
Mr. Sociologist apparently had gotten religion about 1 millisecond after the bully's fist met up with his nose and he got up off the floor screaming for the cops to arrest the bad guy, beat him senseless, shoot him and anything else that could come to the forefront of his foggy mind.
Apparently, after his baptism in the River Violence, he saw the light and determined that the way the cops handled the bad guys - force met with equal force - was alright and had his sociological blessing from then on.
I'm also reminded of the method of convincing a person who professes the idealism of pacifism of just how the real world works is to engage them in a discussion of their non-violence idea, then without warning, smack them in the face, knocking them down. If they get up and still profess non-violence, without any verbal argument, smack them again. They most assuredly will readily shed their unworkable theory of non-violence or non-agression most immediately.
For the "two wrongs don't make a right" poster, puleeeeez meet me at the local bar and let me discuss the theory of non-violence, non-agression and Geneva Conventions with you. I promise I won't have to use more than one or two words to convince you that the real world just don' work 'dat way.
Just my US$0.02 and probably worth just that. 8^)
No, but it makes JUSTICE.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.