Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.K. confirms loss of boat communication
AP | 6/21/04

Posted on 06/21/2004 7:24:52 AM PDT by kattracks

BAGHDAD, Iraq (AP) — The Royal Navy acknowledged Monday that it had lost contact with three small patrol boats after they went on a routine mission in the waterway between Iraq and Iran, a British military spokesman said.

The statement came shortly after state television in Iran said that Tehran had confiscated the three British military vessels and arrested eight armed crew members. British officials did not confirm the boats were captured or the crewmembers detained.

"I can confirm that three small Royal Navy patrol boats and eight crew have been out of communication since the early hours of this morning," said a military spokesman in the southern Iraqi city of Basra on condition of anonymity. "It is not unusual for the Royal Navy to be patrolling the Shatt-al-Arab."

The Royal Navy has been training Iraqi personnel in coastal defense for several weeks on the waterway, and it is possible that the vessels were part of that exercise.



TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: british; iran; maritime; royalnavy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

1 posted on 06/21/2004 7:24:52 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Whoa! This could ramp things up quite a bit. What is their game?


2 posted on 06/21/2004 7:40:56 AM PDT by thegreatbeast (Quid lucrum istic mihi est?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Join Us At Today's Iranian Alert Thread – The Most Underreported Story Of The Year!

Click on the link above!

"If you want on or off this Iran ping list, Freepmail DoctorZin”


3 posted on 06/21/2004 7:55:07 AM PDT by DoctorZIn (Until they are Free, "We shall all be Iranians!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thegreatbeast

Strayed into Iranian waters? Or did the Iranians come out and grab them? All without a trace of communication?


4 posted on 06/21/2004 7:57:36 AM PDT by LikeLight (__________________________)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Thats the bad news; the good news is that Israel just took delivery of air refueling tankers. Now they can easily fly to Iran and back, if need be.


5 posted on 06/21/2004 7:58:55 AM PDT by latrans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: latrans

I'm willing to bet the Brits have a nuke sub somewhere close by...


6 posted on 06/21/2004 8:09:27 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (STAGMIRE !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: thegreatbeast

"Whoa! This could ramp things up quite a bit. What is their game?"

Hostages?


7 posted on 06/21/2004 8:23:56 AM PDT by Califelephant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LikeLight

I tend to believe the Iranians just came out and grabbed them, from Iraqi waters. That's just a personal opinion, though, but they tried the same thing during the first gulf war but all it ended up with was a boatload of dead iranians (can't get into details however. That little "classified" thingie...).

They have a history of this type of behaviour.


8 posted on 06/21/2004 8:44:49 AM PDT by Chad Fairbanks (Welfare's purpose should be to eliminate, as far as possible, the need for its own existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

I say US and the UK call this a Hijacking, hostage taking, and act of war. And then launch all that is needed to turn Iran into a glass parking lot.


9 posted on 06/21/2004 9:10:48 AM PDT by ArmyBratproud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thegreatbeast

"ramp things up quite a bit"

Hmmmm? I'd say this was a very very stupid move by Iran.

If you attack the UK in a war zone .. isn't it logical to assume the USA would join with the UK in getting the boats back ..??


10 posted on 06/21/2004 9:13:53 AM PDT by CyberAnt (President Bush: a core set of principles from which he will not deviate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt


TEHRAN, Iran (AP) - Iran said Monday it had confiscated three British naval vessels and arrested eight armed crew members. The Royal Navy acknowledged it had lost contact with three small patrol boats on a routine mission in the waterway between Iraq and Iran.

British officials did not confirm the boats were captured or the crewmembers detained.

"I can confirm that three small Royal Navy patrol boats and eight crew have been out of communication since the early hours of this morning," said a British military spokesman in the southern Iraqi city of Basra on condition of anonymity. "It is not unusual for the Royal Navy to be patrolling the Shatt-al-Arab" waterway.

Iranian-British relations have been strained in recent days, since London helped draft a resolution at the International Atomic Energy Agency's board of governors meeting last week in Vienna that rebuked Iran for past cover-ups involving its development of nuclear technology.

Iran says its program is aimed only at producing energy, while the United States accuses Tehran of trying to develop nuclear weapons. Iran accused Britain of caving in to U.S. pressure on the resolution.

The three British vessels entered Iranian territorial waters not far from the Iran-Iraq border, the Arabic language Al-Alam television reported.

Iranian forces "confiscated" the vessels and eight military personnel who were on board, the report said.

Iran's Foreign Ministry spokesman Hamid Reza Asefi confirmed the report, according to Iran's main Persian language TV channel.

"Interrogation of those detained will continue until the matter is clarified," Asefi was quoted as saying.

The Royal Navy said it had lost contact with three small patrol boats early Monday.

"I can confirm that three small Royal Navy patrol boats and eight crew have been out of communication since the early hours of this morning," said a British military spokesman in Basra, Iraq, said on condition of anonymity. "It is not unusual for the Royal Navy to be patrolling the Shatt-al-Arab."

A Defense Ministry spokesman described the vessels as "river boat craft with outboard motors," used for training patrols.

The Iranian TV report said crew members were carrying maps and weapons. It also said the vessels were confiscated about 11 a.m. between the Bahmanshir and Arvand rivers, which would put them in the Shatt-al-Arab waterway east of the Iraqi city of Faw.

The ministry said there were no British warships operating in the Shatt-al-Arab waterway but some smaller vessels were there.

The Foreign Office said British diplomats in Tehran had been in contact with the Iranian government but it was still unclear what had happened.

The Royal Navy has been training Iraqi personnel in coastal defense for several weeks on the waterway, and it is possible that the vessels were part of that exercise.


11 posted on 06/21/2004 9:44:06 AM PDT by Rutles4Ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever

BTW, Iran needs to be dealt with...


12 posted on 06/21/2004 9:45:34 AM PDT by Rutles4Ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever

I'm just amazed at Iran.


13 posted on 06/21/2004 9:50:02 AM PDT by txhurl (~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever

In Iranian waters or not? Iran needs to return the sailors and the boats in either case--or face war.


14 posted on 06/21/2004 9:52:09 AM PDT by RightWhale (Destroy the dark; restore the light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: thegreatbeast
Whoa! This could ramp things up quite a bit.

Many wars have begun with far less provocation.

16 posted on 06/21/2004 10:05:51 AM PDT by Rockitz (After all these years, it's still rocket science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz

Iranian TV saying that they confiscated maps and weapons.


17 posted on 06/21/2004 10:14:02 AM PDT by jerseygirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: LikeLight

Kinda hard to figure out where the borders are at sea in small patrol boats.


18 posted on 06/21/2004 10:21:46 AM PDT by maquiladora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: maquiladora

If they had GPS and I'm sure they do, the Brits knew exactly where they were.


19 posted on 06/21/2004 10:23:40 AM PDT by Rockitz (After all these years, it's still rocket science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz
Spec Ops.

The question is whether the Brits were going on a radiation detection mission, or if they were going to arm the anti-Mullah Iranian students.

3 boats is a little large of a group for a recon mission, though...so the odds are that they were going for something a bit more valuable than mere intel.

20 posted on 06/21/2004 10:29:56 AM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson