Posted on 06/19/2004 3:29:49 PM PDT by bboop
Michael Savage has a video, photos of Paul Johnson's beheading at this site. I suspect the Alphabet News will think it is too graphic to show to We the People, but frankly, we HAVE to know our enemies. The Truth will set you free.
One hundred for each one should be the response. Turn on the cameras at Gitmo and behead 100 of them for each American. Chain saws would be really good for that.
Make sure that CNN and Al-Jiz are there, so the word gets back.
Dirty rotten savage animal bastards! Turn nanotechnology loose on all the muuuslime in the world.
I wish to hell there was some way to indict them for this one too.
It's practices, brutality and hierarchical structure is closer to a crime syndicate than anything else.
Excellent observation.
That's why so-called moderate Muslims never protest; they'll be whacked.
There are no moderates in islam, just crooks and savages.
Till 911, the most moderate muslims took pride in al qaeda's butchery.
But then came 911 and these muslims could no longer enjoy western freedoms, while they condoned islamic butchery.
these former al qaeda cheerleaders were deported, fired from their jobs and rejected socially.
They condemned al qaeda only when al qaeda's works hurt them personally. Till al qaeda's work hurt the west, these muslims rejoiced in their acts of butchery.
Muslims have no respect for human rights or life.
These muslims only care about themselves.
They would stop supporting terror only, when it hurts them on a personal level.
we should use broad measures against the islamic world and punish entire nations for terror acts, so that the muslims can no longer blame the acts on a few radicals, while they continue to support these radicals.
if enough muslims lose their jobs and are made miserable by the acts of these terrorists, islamic societies would stop terror from within, not because of a change of feelings for the west, but because it would put their own survival at stake.
These liberal muslims enjoy western freedom and western women.
But they are just hypocrites and crooks. they don't grant their own women the same freedoms and never practice western values themselves.
a liberal muslim is a muslim who abuses western values, don't confuse him with one who would practice western values.
the pictures of johnson are nauseating. why do we have to look at such graphic stuff when we can read about it.
what is this stuff about dan rather? do you have the details on what he said?
I know the thread warned of that.
But out of respect for johnson and his family, i'd rather his photos not be displayed this way.
I find it iteresting how they posed his head in different places, as if they were unsure how to make the best visual impact. Reminded me of some very amature eBay listings by people selling garage sale junk. These terrorists are not professionals.
I find it amusing how they pose with their guns like they are trying to look like Rambo or something. Their obsession with their guns makes me wonder if they are tryint to compensate for something they are lacking.
I've been told this is quite a problem amoung Arabs. The whole misogyny thing is another symptom. But the basic flaw, of course, is their stupidity.
Did anybody else notice Abdulaziz al-Muqrin looks like he could be related to Bin Laden? He has Bin's odd fish lips. Or maybe Arabs are just inbred.
I have been calling for the harshest measures against the islamic world, long before these photos were posted.
I don't need blood and gore to awake me to the reality.
However, the scariest specter of them all would be to see pakistan- the creators of al qaeda and the taliban armed with a fleet of mobile nukes, and iran- the creators of hizbollah armed with another fleet of nukes.
This threat is far greater than any terror threat envisaged in the past and should be duly address regardless of the progress on other fronts of the terror war.
As far as other acts of terror are concerned, The terror threat is more than just a few radicals with guns. Its the islamic schools that churn out millions of these robots each year. The islamic political parties that find popular support for these acts. islamists within the bureacracy, intelligence and military who provide them with support ,and the islamic economic might that makes it all possible.
Terror has to be stopped from within the islamic societies. Knowing just how selfish the muslims are,they will continue to rejoice in the butchery of al qaeda, till al qaeda acts affect every muslim on a personal level.
When they realize that terror acts not just affect the west, but they would affect the muslims as well, it's only thenthat they would try to put a stop to it.
the palestinian intifadah died out and lost support, when israel built the wall and slapped economic hardships on palestinians for terror acts directed at israel.
Till the terrorists were killing israelis, they enjoyed the support of the palestinian population, however once the terror acts started robbing palestinians of jobs in israel, people started rejecting acts of terror.
it's been the same for 911. Before 911, even the most moderate muslims rejoiced in alqaeda's butchery, but once they started getting deported back to their countries and thrown out of work, they saw al qaeda not as an enemy of the west, but their own enemy as well.
Pakistan and saudi arabia continued to support terror till it was hurting the west. However once the terror acts threatened their own security with a US led war imposed on them,unless these guys restrained the terrorists.
These countries cracked down on terror to avoid an iraq and afghanistan like fate. I still don't know if they are just replacing the old crop of terrorits with a new one or just buying time to weather out the conservative
administration.
The war in iraq might not have found any WMD's but it sure did a lot to make libya, pakistan and saudi arabia comply.
These countries would have never got the message, had it not been for iraq.
finally since these acts enjoy popular support in islamic countries, their entire populations have to be de-energized and made to lose faith in islam.
This can only be done with poverty and misery either imposed through war as was the case against germany and japan or through sanctions as was the case with libya and somalia.
we have to reduce these terror sponsors to the same level of misery as that of libya and somalia.
Rob the nations of the wealth that gives them aspirations of global dominance and instead get them busy fighting poverty.
we would also need channelize islamic hate away from the west towards other muslims.
This can be used to cause islamic countries to disintegrate from within into small irrelevant states like former yugoslavia. states that would not have the numbers to field huge armies or the economic might to pursue WMD's or terror.
We could push islamic states into wars against each other. In the past iran-iraq war helped contain a militant iran.
i still feel that we need to go for an iraq like war against the three sponsors of terror, pakistan, iran and saudi arabia to flush them clean from within. The war on terror would buy us time, but never be decisive till these three countries are taken out.
We don't have to rob johnson of his dignity to do all this.
I want to afford johnson the dignity that those savages robbed him of.
MAKES ME GLAD I'M AN ATHEIST,LIKE ALL RELIGIONS,THEIR GOAL IS TO CONTROL YOUR POCKETBOOK,WHAT YOU EAT AND DRINK,WHAT YOU DO,AND MOST IMPORTANCE THE CONTROL OF YOUR MIND.
WE NEED MORE FREE THINKING PEOPLES AN LESS PUPPETS OF THEOCRACY LIKE WE HAVE HERE IN UTAH,AMERICA AND THE REST OF THE PLANET,BLESS OUR LEADER AND MENTOR,MADELYN MURRY O'HAIR,SHE SPOKE THE TRUTH,HER MURDERERS WILL NEVER SILENCE HER TRUTH AND THAT OF HER MURDERED GRANDSONS.
REX
MOUNTAINPAPA@WEBTV.NET
WWW.NOCIRC.ORG
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.