Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Report: Trade Center Towers May Have Been Structurally Weaker Based on Faulty Wind Tests
AP ^ | June 17,2004

Posted on 06/18/2004 4:38:49 PM PDT by nuconvert

Report: Trade Center Towers May Have Been Structurally Weaker Based on Faulty Wind Tests

Michael Weissenstein/Associated Press

Jun 18, 2004

NEW YORK (AP) - The World Trade Center's designers may have severely underestimated the forces that wind exerted on the twin towers, leading them to design skyscrapers less able to handle the Sept. 11 attacks, a federal report says. Wind tunnel tests conducted as part of litigation over the buildings' collapse found wind loads 20 to 60 percent higher than those found in tests performed during the towers' design in the 1960s, according to the report released Friday by a federal institute examining the collapse.

The buildings would have been stronger and might have performed better during the 2001 attacks by terrorists in hijacked jetliners if the higher wind load numbers had been used, said Shyam Sunder, the lead investigator for the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

"It is relevant to evaluating the buildings' capacity to withstand an unanticipated event," he said.

A spokesman for the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, which owns the site, said he could not comment on the NIST findings. He repeated earlier statements that the towers were built according to building standards.

The report also provided the first official estimate of the number of people in the twin towers on the morning the planes struck.

The agency estimated that between 16,200 and 18,600 people were in the mammoth buildings, based on interviews with more than 1,000 of the occupants and with first responders.

The estimate does not vary greatly from newspaper estimates and statements by officials such as former Mayor Rudolph Giuliani, who had said rescuers saved 25,000 people that day. The NIST number does not include people who may have escaped surrounding buildings.

About 2,800 people were killed in the attack.

The institute's investigation began two years ago as an effort to determine why the buildings collapsed and apply the lessons to possible improvements in building codes and other standards. Its final report is due in December.

Investigators have found that north tower structural components that had been coated with thicker fireproofing during a 1990s upgrade had more than three times the ability to withstand fire than original components in the south tower.

The institute is examining whether fireproofing was a factor in the north tower's ability to stand twice as long as the south tower after it was hit.

The report also details the collapse of 7 World Trade Center, a 47-story building that was not hit by a plane but burned for hours before collapsing that afternoon.

The city's emergency operations center was located in the building, which housed diesel fuel to power the center and generators for other tenants. The NIST found that the collapse most likely originated around the fifth floor, near a distribution system for the fuel.

No one was killed in the collapse of 7 World Trade Center, but the Giuliani administration has been criticized for locating the city's emergency center in a building containing thousands of gallons of diesel fuel.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: newyork; nist; ny; skyscrapers; towers; twintowers; wind; wtc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: dighton

:)


21 posted on 06/18/2004 5:40:51 PM PDT by Iberian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

Hello. The World Trade Center did not collapse due to extreme wind loads. They fell because a huge fireball at the heart of each of the buildings caused loss of strength of the supporting columns of steel framework, resulting in buckling and collapse. The wind stress tests had ZILCH to do with the relative strength of the vertical columns.


22 posted on 06/18/2004 5:40:53 PM PDT by alloysteel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJSAMPLE
. Won't they ever stop trying to find an ounce of blame for somebody other than Al Qaeda?

Lawyers can't really sue Al Qaeda, so the search for blame (liability) continues.

23 posted on 06/18/2004 5:43:40 PM PDT by Blue Screen of Death (,/i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel

Yep, that too.


24 posted on 06/18/2004 5:45:00 PM PDT by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel

That's what I understand also.


25 posted on 06/18/2004 5:46:04 PM PDT by nuconvert ("America will never be intimidated by thugs and assassins." ( Azadi baraye Iran)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

If my uncle had boobs he'd be my aunt.


26 posted on 06/18/2004 5:46:41 PM PDT by Iberian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

They were stopped from using Asbestos just above the 64th floor. That's when the asbestos scare hit, so they went with something else for the highest floors.


27 posted on 06/18/2004 6:39:53 PM PDT by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SJSAMPLE
Right. I saw in on The History Channel, I believe!
28 posted on 06/18/2004 6:41:16 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
Typical Associated Press bullsh*t. The Towers did not fall because of high winds, or winds at all. They fell because the burning jet fuel caused the structural steel beams that held up certain floors to fail. The buidlings then pancaked down, floor on floor, just like buildings brought down by Controlled Demolition, Inc. (the folks in Towson, Maryland, who specialize in dropping obsolete buildings straight down on themselves).

And part of the reason those steel beams melted is that the enviro-weanies had stopped the coating of those beams with asbestos at the 70th floor. The asbestos itself never harmed anyone. However, the absence of it above the 70th floor may have doomed almost 3,000 people.

John / Billybob

29 posted on 06/18/2004 6:58:46 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob (www.ArmorforCongress.com Visit. Join. Help. Please.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson