Posted on 06/18/2004 11:53:00 AM PDT by jmstein7
John Kerry, the Democratic Party’s presumptive nominee for President of the United States, has been caught stealing from the American taxpayers – and he should be ashamed of himself.
Title 2, Section 39, of the United States Code clearly states that “[t]he Secretary of the Senate ... shall deduct from the [salary] of each Member ... the amount of his salary for each day that he has been absent from the Senate ... unless such Member ... assigns as the reason for such absence the sickness of himself or of some member of his family."
The plain and unambiguous meaning of this statute is that a Senator who misses work doesn’t get paid – just like ordinary Americans. Unfortunately, the Secretary of the Senate, Ms. Emily Reynolds, has improperly, and inappropriately, declined to carry out her statutory duty – i.e. to dock the pay of Senators who miss work. When pressed, Ms. Reynolds explained, in a response to a letter by David Keene of the Carmen Group, that since her predecessors in the position failed to carry out the law, she won’t either. This reasoning is absurd – and unlawful.
An officer of the Senate is bound by the law as it applies to that officer. When the law states that an officer of the Senate “shall” do something, that officer is bound to carry out the mandate of the law. If individuals were free to ignore the law as they pleased, our society would fall apart. The Secretary of the Senate is no exception – she is not above the law. Her failure to carry out the mandate of Title 2, Section 39 is a clear violation of federal law. However, ultimate culpability does not end with Ms. Reynolds.
Ignorance of the law, in American society, is never a valid defense to the commission of an unlawful act – thus, all Americans are charged with knowledge of the law. Lawyers, who are, ideally, learned in the law, should be held to a higher standard; though it sounds like an oxymoron, they are indeed held to a standard of lawyers’ ethics.
A United States Senator, charged with promulgating the law, and especially a Senator who is a lawyer, thus, must be held to the highest standard of legal and ethical conduct. John Kerry is both a Senator and a lawyer. As such, Senator Kerry is charged with knowledge of the law and must be held to the highest standard of legal and ethical conduct. In this respect, Kerry is a “miserable failure.”
John Kerry is charged with knowing that the Secretary of the Senate is to dock his pay when he fails to show up for work – and that there is no exception in the law for campaign activities. Thus, any payment made to a Senator in violation of Title 2, Section 39 is an illegal payment of funds from the U.S. Treasury and, legally speaking, theft of taxpayer money – John Kerry is presumed to know that these payments are illegal. Therefore, by knowingly accepting these illegal payments, Senator Kerry himself is breaking the law.
While, of course, this rationale applies to all Senators, John Kerry warrants special condemnation: Senator Kerry is running for President and he has the most dismal attendance record in the Senate; Kerry has been absent, without valid excuse, 87 percent of the time this session! Ergo, John Kerry is the most flagrant offender – and “everyone is doing it” is not a reasonable excuse. Further, an ordinary American who is absent from their job 87 percent of the time wouldn’t merely be docked pay – that person would be fired!
In the interest of restoring the rule of law, I have personally filed a formal ethics complaint against both Senator Kerry and the Secretary of the Senate with the Senate Select Committee on Ethics, which has jurisdiction over this matter. It is quite sad that it takes the efforts of a mere law student to force a candidate for the Presidency to obey the law that, if successful, he will be sworn to uphold himself.
This matter draws yet another bright line between Senator Kerry and President Bush. When then-Governor Bush ran for President, he declined to accept his salary, as Governor, when he needed to campaign full time – even though Texas law did not require him to do so. On the other hand, though Unites States law requires Kerry not to accept his salary when he campaigns full time and cannot be present in the Senate, Kerry has opted to accept his salary illegally.
BUMP!
Please keep us updated!
He's sick alright....
BUMP!
The other side of this is that he is personally required to repay the mortgage...the boytoy can't legally use Sexy's money. Without his Senate salary...he has essentially no income. He has trapped himself...either he breaks the law on taking his salary, or he breaks campaign finance law to pay back the mortgage.
BUMP!
"Stealing"?
Another histrionic NewsMax article.
BUMP!
This is happened more than once so maybe someone can help me out here.
WHAT'S WRONG WITH NEWSMAX??
What did they do or don't do? I've read more than a few people who complained about them so what's up??
Also remember that the Democrats screamed for Bob Dole to resign his Senate seat in 1996. Dole was Senate Majority Leader.
But laws don't apply to Lieberman in 2000, and now Ketchup Boy. Keep up the good work. You are indeed THE MAN!
Look, NewsMax is better than nothing. Even FOX isn't picking up this story. What's wrong with the media? Here is a US Senator violating the laws he was sworn to uphold.
Jon,
Several news agencies called this story last evening. Of course, we only saw the Assistant Governor of Mass on the news. You would think that Hannity would have contacted you.
Has anyone asked you to be on TV yet?
Knock it off...
>
Do you KNOW who I AM !?!?!
Has anyone found any statements from Kerry when Sen Dole resigned from the Senate to run for President???? I haven't, but it would be interesting if he did take a position..
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
