Imagine that! Ted Kennedy and John Kerry must be throwing fits right now!
To: georgiadevildog
It's all about Miss Hillary
To: georgiadevildog
Well a lot of the intelligence was gathered during the Clinton years - what else can Bubba say (don't answer that).
3 posted on
06/17/2004 11:18:26 AM PDT by
rhombus
To: georgiadevildog
Well of course he is.
He knows that his Justice Department obtained an indictment of OBL in 1998 that cited OBL's long standing relationship with Iraq.
4 posted on
06/17/2004 11:19:07 AM PDT by
Peach
(The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
To: georgiadevildog
Clinton will be interviewed next week by...... Sean Hannity of Fox News.
5 posted on
06/17/2004 11:21:04 AM PDT by
Reagan Man
(THE CHOICE IS CLEAR..........RE-ELECT BUSH-CHENEY)
To: georgiadevildog
If you recall, Richard Clarke testified before the 9/11 commission that Clinton wanted to get rid of Saddam Hussien but didn't feel he could get the support of the American people behind him. Of course it's hard to say what was factual after Clarkes self opposing testimonies in public and private.
6 posted on
06/17/2004 11:21:38 AM PDT by
cripplecreek
(you tell em i'm commin.... and hells commin with me.)
To: georgiadevildog
What does supportive mean? I haven't heard clinton speaking out in defense of Bush any time recently. Or for the past year. He has other things on his mind, like chasing after his mythical historic legacy and young women.
7 posted on
06/17/2004 11:22:20 AM PDT by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: georgiadevildog
If he comes out publicly like that, I'll be the first in line to thank Mr. Clinton, and to give him his due.
8 posted on
06/17/2004 11:23:49 AM PDT by
Paradox
(Occam was probably right.)
To: georgiadevildog
No surprise. First, he needs to ensure that Bush wins the election in order for Hillary to mount a campaign in '08. Secondly, he's all about "Legacy" building. His grandstanding bellicosity against Saddam needs to be interpreted as something other than his "anti-Monica" diversionary tactic.
To: georgiadevildog; Mitchell
"it will surprise some people."
Only because the media is treating Iraq as if it came out of the blue with the Bush Administration.
In fact, Clinton tried to drum up support for the final reckoning with Saddam, but only partly succeeded with the Iraq Liberation Act.
10 posted on
06/17/2004 11:26:44 AM PDT by
Shermy
To: georgiadevildog
Clinton Supportive of Bush on Iraq, says Dan RatherSave the bull s&it, Klinton. I heard you spewing your filth about GW in Brazil.
You CONVICTED LIAR, you.
11 posted on
06/17/2004 11:27:17 AM PDT by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
To: georgiadevildog
Oh, really? The Weinsteins coming to Michael Moore's rescue suggests otherwise. And that's just for starters...
12 posted on
06/17/2004 11:27:36 AM PDT by
mewzilla
To: georgiadevildog
13 posted on
06/17/2004 11:27:50 AM PDT by
jmstein7
(A Judge not bound to the original meaning of the Constitution interprets nothing but his own mind.)
To: georgiadevildog
x42 returning the favor for Bush's kind remarks about Clinton this week at the White House.
15 posted on
06/17/2004 11:31:28 AM PDT by
My2Cents
(Well.....there you go again.)
To: georgiadevildog
Probably just using more of Dick Morris' triangulation so that he can suck in the moderate suckers. Call me cynical.
21 posted on
06/17/2004 12:08:36 PM PDT by
FreeAtlanta
(never surrender, this is for the kids)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson