"What does the guidon for company in a Balanced Combined Arms Battalion look like?"
Posted on 06/17/2004 7:27:49 AM PDT by Cannoneer No. 4
June 17, 2004: The U.S. Army is in the midst of transforming existing combat brigades to a new brigade sized unit with the uninspired name of “Unit of Action” (UA). The new UA organization is designed to bring all the elements the brigade needs to fight under one headquarters, make the brigade more modular, easier to deploy, and increase the number of combat brigades available within the army from 33 to 43 or 48, and therefore increase the combat power of the Army. In order to evaluate this, we shall compare the Brigade Combat Team (BCT) used during the 2003 invasion of Iraq, with the UA.
What is a BCT? Simply put, a BCT is composed of a Brigade Headquarters, maneuver (tank or infantry) battalions, a small brigade reconnaissance troop (company sized unit of about a hundred men), and supporting organizations. Only the maneuver units are directly under the command of the brigade commander, all the other units (Engineer, Field Artillery, Signal, Service Support, Air Defense, Military Police, and Military Intelligence) are all in a Direct Support role and still report to division support headquarters.
A UA is essentially the same as a BCT, except all forces are under the command of the UA Commander. A Heavy UA consists of a headquarters company, an MI (military Intelligence) Company, a Signal (communications) Company, MP (Military Police) Platoon, two Balanced Combined Arms Battalions (each with two Tank and two Mechanized Infantry companies), a reconnaissance Squadron (battalion), a Field Artillery Battalion, and a Support Battalion. It has a much more robust reconnaissance capability than does the BCT.
A UA maneuver battalion consists of a headquarters company, 2 tank and 2 mechanized infantry companies, and an engineer company while a BCT [manuever battalion] in OIF consisted of a headquarters and 3 maneuver companies (all either tank or infantry).
An “old” division controlled 3 maneuver brigades whereas the new Division (also called a Unit of Employment, or UE) will control up to four maneuver UAs, as well as an Aviation UA, a Strike UA, and probably a Support UA.
The unit of action is designed to be more modular, but is it really?
The BCT used in Iraq in 2003, and those that came before it, was a tailorable, modular force capable of being traded among divisions. Its only “assigned” unit was the brigade headquarters company, and it could control from two to five maneuver battalions, plus supporting arms.
During Desert Storm, nearly every division deployed with at least one brigade from another division. The 1st Infantry Division’s third brigade was from the 2nd Armored Division. The 1st Cavalry Division also deployed with a brigade of the 2nd Armored Division, and still a third brigade of the 2nd Armored Division served with the US Marines. The 24th Infantry Division left behind its National Guard round out brigade [48th SIB (Mech), GAARNG couldn't get through NTC] and deployed with the 197th Separate Infantry Brigade instead. The 1st and 3rd Armored Divisions deployed with elements of the 3rd and 8th Infantry Divisions. So modularity is nothing particularly new.
One of the hallmarks of the new UA is supposed to be its deployability. As can be seen from the below table, the UA has 16 more major combat systems than does the BCT. This total does not include the many other wheeled and tracked vehicles equipment that are found in the either the BCT or the UA.
Obviously, there is no effective way to deploy this size force by air, so sealift is the best way to deploy it or prepositioned equipment must be used. In order to shorten deployment times, the Army maintains prepositioned equipment in various parts of the world (Korea, the Persian Gulf, and some in Europe) as well as some afloat.
Currently, the Army has an Afloat Prepositioning Ship Squadron (ASPRON), designated ASPRON 4, operated by the Military Sealift Command. ASPRON 4 is currently permanently stationed in the Persian Gulf and consists of eight Large, Medium Speed, Roll-On Roll-Off (LMSR) ships: USNS Watson (T-AKR 310), USNS Sisler (T-AKR 311), USNS Dahl (T-AKR 312), USNS Red Cloud (T-AKR 313), USNS Charlton (T-AKR 314), USNS Watkins (T-AKR 315), USNS Pomeroy (T-AKR 316), and USNS Soderman. Each ship can carry about an Army Tank-Mechanized Infantry Task Force’s equipment, consisting of 58 heavy combat vehicles (M1 and M2/M3), 48 other tracked vehicles, and over 900 other support vehicles, such as trucks.
The squadron can carry enough equipment for balanced BCT (2 tank and 2 Mechanized Infantry Battalions, plus supporting units) and supplies for 15 days of combat or a Heavy Armored Cavalry Regiment such as the 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiment, so it is well capable of supporting a UA.
From our cursory look at the UA, it is no more modular or deployable than the BCT, though it does have more combat power available. A more deployable force will probably have to wait until the Future Combat System is fielded; its goal is to be deployable by air within 96 hours, just as are the Stryker Brigade Combat Teams. --Michael K. Robel
ping
That quote reminds me of the exact thing our military does currently.
I guess wardogs haven't changed all that much in 2000 years, just their equipment.
Bump. Sounds like the old German KampfGruppen.
Bump for later.
Meanwhile, the Stryker Brigade Combat Teams are infantry-centric.
What does the guidon for company in a Balanced Combined Arms Battalion look like?
Some things never change. What really used to bug the hell out of me was reorganization for its own sake. Nothing broken, but by gum we're going to fix it anyway!
it all makes the head swim, and it usually ends up not meaning much. As much as I'm no fan of inter-branch squabbles ['cause the Artillery is always right :) ], I don't see these mixed battalions as a good thing -- I think infantry, armor and artillery battalions need to be able to fight as units and as parts of larger, brigade and division sized units. If you never train as a battalion or division, how the hell to you answer a call for fire for a "div arty 8, DPICM in effect"
"Nothing broken, but by gum we're going to fix it anyway!"
The problem is that your statement is both correct and incorrect. The Army's main mission has to be to win the "big war", and the Army does not need fixing for that mission. The Army is ill equipped and/or organized to fight "little wars", and politics demands that the Army have a role in such conflicts. Hence, the Army needs to be fixed. What worries me is we'll get some sort of compromise that can't fight either the big or little wars worth spit, and the knowledge of how to fight big wars will be lost. The learning curve in big wars is too frightful to contemplate with today's media.
What bothers me is that they are magnifying rather than fixing one of the biggest problems: our tooth to tail ratio is too low. Not enough shooters.
All this to put 8 manuever companies on the ground? Based on our inability to do a reorg right, I suggest we simply increase the number of heavy cavalry regiments. That force structure is better than this.
"What does the guidon for company in a Balanced Combined Arms Battalion look like?"
Two centipedes in an embrace?
Actually it is one centipede committing an unnatural act.
I thought it looked like the Ultima Online 'U' symbol thingy.
Sounds like the Army reshaping into the USMC MEF.
History does have a way of repeating itself.
I was thinking of a blue guidon with a mech infantry symbol and a big "?" inside the "tracked" circle.
And If I could upload the pic I made of it, I would.
This "Unit of Action" is making my head swim .... will ADCs go away and BGs be the Commanders? Will O-6s now be Deputies like in the Berlin Brigade? Will Battalion Commanders now have their senior raters be the UE or the UA Commanders ..... a thousand headaches .... Can an UE now mass his fires on the "Main Effort". I think this is about 2 steps back. The BCTs were pretty good, but I always thought the ADC was a broken system. Yes, even for an infantry guy, I really do like the FA, US Army artillery was (and I hope still is) the best in the world.
LOL...that Petronius Arbiter quote has been floatimg around ever since he said it...LOL. I have seen that one on 'lavatory walls' in Mil facilities around the world...lol.
Mebbe they just use those flourescent antenna balls like ya see in the parking lots.
"What does the guidon for company in a Balanced Combined Arms Battalion look like?"
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.