Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Peak Oil reality? What do you think?

Posted on 06/17/2004 7:00:39 AM PDT by jimknopf

If it's for real, we have ~5 years before the end. If it's not, we have ~30 unless our "need" for it increases, in which case it's more like 20 before the inevitable destroys us.

If you are sure peak oil is a phony scare tactics, please tell us WHY. A bunch of "No, it's not real" posts with no substance behind it will NOT be considered.

I've seen lots of web sites clearly suggesting peak oil is possible.

Here are the very official figures, and my static calculation:

Source: Energy Information Administration

Here is an Excel-sheet that lists the world reserves as of Jan. 1, 2003. It already shows the Canadian tar sand.

On the same site you find an Excel sheet that shows the daily oil demand (currently 80 million barrels a day, or 29.2 billion barrels a year) worldwide.

Assuming in a very simplified calculation that the demand stays constant (due to the economic growth of India and China it will probably increase) and that no significant new reservoirs are found, these figures imply that the known oil reserves would last 41.5 years (taking the figures of Oil & Gas Journal; the figures of World Oil imply a reach of 35 years).

I think it's plausible to assume that the price would rise sharply long before the end.

Now it's time for a rebuttal.

Please calm our fears.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: oil; peakoil
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

1 posted on 06/17/2004 7:00:40 AM PDT by jimknopf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jimknopf

Price: The ultimate regulator of demand.


2 posted on 06/17/2004 7:02:29 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie (Islam: Nothing BEER couldn't cure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad Cloven

You are right. But the hypothesis that a "peak" in production could be reached soon is a physical aspect, not an economic question.


3 posted on 06/17/2004 7:05:29 AM PDT by jimknopf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jimknopf

OK. How about starting with the fact that the current figures and projections only include the Oil that can be Recovered, at Current Prices. As Prices go up, the feasability of Exploring for new sources, and recovering some existing sources not counted due to lack of viablity, will become producing sources.


That is a large what if, unaddressed by the Peak Oil hysteria/fallacy.


4 posted on 06/17/2004 7:05:41 AM PDT by hobbes1 (Hobbes1TheOmniscient® "I know everything so you don't have to" ;)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimknopf
Incorrect, it is a decidedly economic question. Even the capacity to refine, is currently an economic rather than a physical question, and as per your request, just saying it isn't is not sufficient.

Explanation is merited.

5 posted on 06/17/2004 7:07:16 AM PDT by hobbes1 (Hobbes1TheOmniscient® "I know everything so you don't have to" ;)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jimknopf

The DUmmies were soiling themselves over this issue the other day. Anything they take THAT seriously is probably bunk.


Look closely at who is pushing 'Peak Oil' and ask yourself "What are they selling?"


6 posted on 06/17/2004 7:08:57 AM PDT by Petronski (Ronald Reagan: 1015 electoral votes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimknopf

For fossil fuel wonks, I'm sure your discussion is pertinent. However, for us great unwashed, we need only care about the marginal cost of the next unit of energy produced.

For example, wind energy is only slighly uneconomic today. Here in North Dakota, we could economically put up a few hundred thousand windmills if other energy prices consistently rise, say 25%.

Plus, I have a friend who went to the Colorado School of Mines who claimed that one county in Wyoming had more energy in coal than all the oil in Saudi. That's a lot of BTUs. Sulfuric, sure, but I suspect scrubbing technology is only a matter of expense.

Which brings me back to my point: non-wonks need only care about the marginal cost of energy. Certainly, costs will rise, but in a moderate fashion, one which our modern flexible capitalist economy will quickly accomodate.

Have another cup of coffee, and a great and profitable day!


7 posted on 06/17/2004 7:12:23 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie (Islam: Nothing BEER couldn't cure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jimknopf
Assuming in a very simplified calculation that the demand stays constant...

Bad assumptions lead to bad results.

If production were to fall, demand will also fall. Oil will be priced in such a way that supply balances demand. If there is a shortage, prices will be bid up to such a level that the demand decreases and the shortage is eliminated.

This is all Econ 101. Nothing complicated here.

Now it is true that oil consumption is fairly inelastic in the short term. But over a number of years, people's consumption habits will adapt to the new price levels, as they start driving less or more fuel efficiently and consume less energy in general.

The actual result of Peak Oil will be a regime of structurally increasing prices and general inflation. But Peak Oil does not mean that we will run out of oil. As oil becomes more expensive, it will become less dominant as an energy source.

Think of whale oil. Whale oil used to be used in lamps all up and down the Eastern Seabord of the United States. Nowadays, it is practically non-existant. Cheaper and more reliable substitutes became available and the cost of whale oil became too high, reletively speaking. One could still produce whale oil today, but why would anyone want to?

A hundred years from now, oil will be an anachronism, mainly of interest to historical buffs and people with obsolete equipment.

8 posted on 06/17/2004 7:12:30 AM PDT by bondjamesbond (Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hobbes1
I agree that the economic viability of production depends on the price.

So you are right, the exact point of peak oil (if it exists) depends on the price, too.

But what I mean is if there simply IS no more oil, than the price is not important.

I don't think that the eia figures are based only on current prices. There is no disclaimer saying so.

The Canadian tar sand is included, and as of Jan. 2003 (with a lower oil price than today) it was perhaps not a good idea to explore it. Nevertheless it appears in the statistics.
9 posted on 06/17/2004 7:14:24 AM PDT by jimknopf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jimknopf

Hubbert's peak was very precise in predicting the time at which US domestic production would peak. It appears we are now approaching that point with respect to worldwide production. We won't run out of oil, but demand is beginning to outstrip the rate at which we can bring it to the surface. At 10.5 mil barrels/day the Saudis are approaching peak production levels. There's not a whole lot of swing left in that swing producer. Worldwide consumption is at 81 mil/day and growing rapidly. Permanently higher prices would appear to be on the horizon even if the radicals don't win out in the ME.


10 posted on 06/17/2004 7:14:32 AM PDT by bereanway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimknopf
Interesting subject.

Just listening in mostly, having no expertise on the subject.

But oil is a finite resource and there is a last barrel.

I will be glad when solar or wind power is affordable.

11 posted on 06/17/2004 7:17:09 AM PDT by No Blue States
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad Cloven
According to the published analysis based on Hubert's theory, what happens at the "peak" is that oil production can no longer increase, and instead begins to decline. We don't run out of oil. What happens is the price of oil increases to the point that conservation, and alternative sources of energy, reduce the demand for petroleum products to the level of existing supply.

That is why the study was called "The End of Cheap OIL."

You can find the original article published in Scientific American during March, 1998 here:

http://www.hubbertpeak.com/sciam983.htm

One might argue that in the time period since the article was written, oil supply, world oil demand, and oil prices have all tended to follow the pattern one might expect if the "peak" were real. However, we will not know for certain until several years after the "peak" occurs, if and when it does.

In any event, this is an economic scenario, which should at least be tested in any long range planning. Such planning would directionally encourage such things as tar sands development, increased use of hybrids car engines, distributed electrical generation, methane hydrate exploration, etc. All of these activities are being pursued as though someone thought the higher oil prices implicit in the "peak" theory had some validity.
12 posted on 06/17/2004 7:18:11 AM PDT by LOC1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bondjamesbond

Assumptions... There are good reasons to assume that China will increase the demand.

Qou are quite optimistic that the transformation process happens without frictions. But you seem to agree that in 100 years there won't be any more oil...


13 posted on 06/17/2004 7:19:51 AM PDT by jimknopf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: LOC1

Thanks for your link!


14 posted on 06/17/2004 7:20:53 AM PDT by jimknopf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: jimknopf
So you are right, the exact point of peak oil (if it exists) depends on the price, too.

Not exactly. A Rising price, could in fact put a peak on the Demand for Oil, rather than the ability to produce it, driving demand below production levels. (Theoretically, and in all likelyhood what would be more likely to happen.(See the poster above Hybrid Cars etc...).

15 posted on 06/17/2004 7:22:39 AM PDT by hobbes1 (Hobbes1TheOmniscient® "I know everything so you don't have to" ;)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Brad Cloven

Plus, I have a friend who went to the Colorado School of Mines who claimed that one county in Wyoming had more energy in coal than all the oil in Saudi. That's a lot of BTUs. Sulfuric, sure, but I suspect scrubbing technology is only a matter of expense.
Actually PRB coal(Powder River Basin) is low sulphur. Scrubbers are nevertheless required because of CAA.But yes they have several lifetimes of coal reserves known.


16 posted on 06/17/2004 7:22:45 AM PDT by BipolarBob (Yes I backed over the vampire, but I swear I didn't see it in my rearview mirror.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jimknopf

You are making a jump from NO MORE OIL NEEDED, to No More Oil, they are in fact opposites.


17 posted on 06/17/2004 7:23:32 AM PDT by hobbes1 (Hobbes1TheOmniscient® "I know everything so you don't have to" ;)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: jimknopf; Constitution Day; BlueLancer; Poohbah; hellinahandcart
If you are sure peak oil is a phony scare tactics, please tell us WHY. A bunch of "No, it's not real" posts with no substance behind it will NOT be considered. ... Please calm our fears.

If this question conforms to your rules, who is "us" and "our"?

18 posted on 06/17/2004 7:26:26 AM PDT by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bondjamesbond

The stone age didn't end because they ran out of stones :-)


19 posted on 06/17/2004 7:27:26 AM PDT by Eurotwit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Eurotwit

bump for an interesting lurk.


20 posted on 06/17/2004 7:44:00 AM PDT by Jalapeno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson