What is a "WOT?" This is as asinine as a "War On Blitzkrieg" or a "War On Kamikazes."
Terror is only a strategy, not an ideology. You can't make war on a strategy.
Every time you read "War On Terror," you should be reminded that we are still too PC-ridden to even name the enemy.
Our enemies all have something in common: when they are slaughtering innocents, they scream "ALLAHU AKBAR!"
That should be a clue about who our enemies are.
Our enemy is not "Terror."
Well said. Terror is only ONE of the weapons.
Oh yeah, brilliant move, change it to the 'War On Islam', and watch a Saudi oil embargo end the recovery, giving us $4 a gallon gas and a President Kerry.
This bears repeating. Reagan stood there and called communism EVIL. The domestic commies (the Dems and the press) blew a gasket over it.
So far, Bush hasn't done this. In fact, soon after 911, Debbie Schlussel was drummed out of the press because she had the audacity to identify Jihad with Islam.
This PC stupidity is going to defeat us if we don't find a way to stop it. I for one am not fooled.
We get it Travis, (and so does Bush). It makes little sense to bring the whole of Islam to the battle ready state. It is sufficient to kill them as they pick up weapons, (and support those with weapons). The vast majority of islam will slink away for hundreds of years if enough of their leaders are slain. They don't have the will to fight, or organize but for those we label terrorists.
I am for killing them as they come over the barricade, and sooner or later there will be a sea change in the religion and it will dawn on them that the angel gaberael really meant for the children of Ishmael to get along with the children of David.
Now as to Sadar, I would not trust one word he says. Here I think Bush may be making a mistake, but time will tell.
Hehe, good point.