Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ronald Reagan's Message Of Inclusion (Bill Boyarsky On How The Gipper Tamed A Rough Right
Los Angeles Times ^ | 06/7/04 | Bill Boyarsky

Posted on 06/12/2004 3:15:49 AM PDT by goldstategop

When Ronald Reagan emerged on the California political scene in the mid-1960s, the conservative movement was a collection of ineffective, naysaying right-wingers huddling in Orange County and San Gabriel Valley backyards, feverishly parsing school books for signs of communist or pornographic influence and flirting with the oddball extremists of the John Birch Society.

Reagan taught manners to these misfits and, in the process, gave them respectability. He shared their intense patriotism, their economic and social conservatism and their militant anti-communism, but he was likable, more genial than fierce.

Most important, Reagan understood that a successful political movement had to be inclusive. Ironclad adherence to right-wing philosophy would not win the votes of moderate Republicans or of the growing number of Democrats disenchanted with their party's support of strong civil rights laws and its soft attitude toward student demonstrations.

Charmed by his personality, enthralled by his speeches and celebrity and wowed by his political skills, California conservatives lined up behind him enthusiastically, as did conservatives around the nation in the years that followed. They became an essential part of what he called "a prairie fire," sweeping through the growing suburbs of the West and the South and ultimately into the once reliably Democratic working-class neighborhoods of the Midwest and ultimately into the once reliably Democratic working-class neighborhoods of the Midwest and East.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: conservatism; inclusion; politicalstrategy; pragmatism; presidentreagan; ronaldreagan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
Bill Boyarsky's point is the conservative movement can't be ideologically pure. We have to reach out to people who don't agree with us 100% on all of our goals so we can have a majority. We want to be in so we can get what we can take and fight for the rest later. Ronald Reagan understood this. So does Arnold Schwarzenegger. As along as we make conservatism inclusive without sacrificing our principles, we will win.
1 posted on 06/12/2004 3:15:53 AM PDT by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Are you proposing a return to country club Republicanism?
2 posted on 06/12/2004 5:29:03 AM PDT by Little Bill (Welcome to the Gay State!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Little Bill

No I'm not. All I'm point out with 36% of the population, conservatives are not yet a majority. We have to convince people who aren't brain-dead liberals they're better off with us than with the other side. That's why Ronald Reagan made a connection with people who didn't agree with him on every issue. We need to do the same.


3 posted on 06/12/2004 5:33:18 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
The conservative "movement" has always consisted of a number of smaller "movements" and conservative-based belief systems. Always. The genius of Ronald Reagan is that he knew this and managed to corral all the various segments of the Right under one tent. Reagan knew intrinsically that 75% is better than 0%.

Early in his first term, many on the social conservatives were openly disappointed with Ronald Reagan (Paul Weyrich, President of the CSFC stated his own early disappointment in a Newsmax column this past week). Richard Viguerie, Howie Phillips, Ed McAteer, all publicly expressed various degrees of disappointment. The core groups most enthralled by Reagan early on were the neo-cons, the supply siders, and the more libertarian leaning rightwingers. They were more willing to work with the social conservatives than the social conservatives were willing to work with them - yet Reagan for the most part managed to hold the whole thing together by his overall set of beliefs and the courage he had in expressing his convictions.

For all President Reagan did for his country (and does now even in death), what makes me smile most is when I look at just how many talented and energized younger Republicans (under 35) there are today who say they are Republican because of Ronald Reagan or because of their respective parents - who were, or became, Republicans because of Ronald Reagan.

This group of younger GOP'rs, at least the voluminous number of those with whom I have worked directly and personally, are more libertarian leaning and neo-con than many of our social-con brethren would like - but they are Reagan Republicans through and through.
4 posted on 06/12/2004 5:47:29 AM PDT by NCPAC ("Tax me a dollar a week for defense,...and leave me alone,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Conservative Politics is like Conservative Churches, if you have principles you grow, as long as you maintain them.

We are 40% of the Republican Party, 50% in Mass, and our Rino's still ignore us. Ronnie would have been a Greater Prez if he hadn't listened to the FDR pubbies. People loved Reagan because he had a core set of values that were unwavering, in guy talk, he had nads that clanged.

He got into trouble when he deviated and played politics, Reagan Rats want a Prez that stands for what they stand for, Home, Country, and Family with out compromise.

5 posted on 06/12/2004 5:53:32 AM PDT by Little Bill (Welcome to the Gay State!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Little Bill

I don't think Reagan ever represented "country club Republicans" --- in fact it was that type who turned off his mike when he demanded it be turned back on. Reagan was a true Conservative --- but he actually had gay friends like Rock Hudson even though he wouldn't have promoted the homosexual agenda. Maybe he saw the good in people.


6 posted on 06/12/2004 6:15:32 AM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Reagan was a true leader, I can see people who are actually liberals but when they talk about Reagan they agree with him and start talking like Conservatives --- not that they really changed completely. Some Conservatives can lead people who are already Conservatives but Reagan had the rare ability to move people into the Conservative area.


7 posted on 06/12/2004 6:19:59 AM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FITZ
I don't think so either but people of his era, my father for example; a couple of years younger, were much further to the left than my grandfather or I for that matter.

Modern Conservatism is defined by the Goldwater agenda and revulsion to the 60's agenda. Reagan was the first to exemplify this and I don't think that, in his second term, he was well served by his advisor's.

8 posted on 06/12/2004 6:31:25 AM PDT by Little Bill (Welcome to the Gay State!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

"Reagan understood that a successful political movement had to be inclusive. "

The republicans MUST be inclusive or they will cease to exist. To obsess about so called rinos instead of going after democrats is just plain head-in-the-sandism.


9 posted on 06/12/2004 6:39:24 AM PDT by tkathy (nihilism: absolute destructiveness toward the world at large and oneself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Little Bill

I agree with that --- the other type of Republicans got right to work trying to reign in Reaganism --- they never wanted Reagan to win the Republican nomination in the first place. Reagan represented the Conservative takeover of the Republican party.


10 posted on 06/12/2004 6:52:33 AM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: FITZ
Look at post 9, for an example of why we are known as the stupid party.
11 posted on 06/12/2004 7:04:41 AM PDT by Little Bill (Welcome to the Gay State!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Little Bill

It depends on what is meant by inclusive --- Reagan was a uniter and brought people toward the Conservative side which is why he won real landslide elections. He never promoted welfare programs or homosexual agendas or abortion to be inclusive --- he liked everyone and invited everyone to follow him. He slashed government programs because he believed that people were equal and skin color or ethnic background wouldn't hold someone back and he won higher percents of minority votes than those who try other ways to be inclusive.


12 posted on 06/12/2004 7:27:48 AM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: FITZ
Reagan was an American and pointed out things that we hadn't heard during the reign of the peanut, of Killer Rabbit fame. Mainly we like being as FRee as the feds will let us, LOL, and we like to have the slaves of the world have the same FReedom.

That was a strong message to the future frogs of this world, there are some things that detente can't buy, and he backed it up, love the man.

13 posted on 06/12/2004 7:47:50 AM PDT by Little Bill (Welcome to the Gay State!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Bill Boyarsky's point is the conservative movement can't be ideologically pure. We have to reach out to people who don't agree with us 100% on all of our goals so we can have a majority.

That's because Bill Boyarsky lacks the creativity to show how conservatism works to solve problems for people who would otherwise find coercive government appealing.

naysaying right-wingers huddling in Orange County and San Gabriel Valley backyards, feverishly parsing school books for signs of communist or pornographic influence

From this vantage point and considering the current product of the public schools, it looks like they were right to be parsing those books.

14 posted on 06/12/2004 7:52:37 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (There are people in power who are truly gutless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
. . . naysaying right-wingers huddling in Orange County and San Gabriel Valley backyards, feverishly parsing school books for signs of communist or pornographic influence

Parents who don't check out their children's textbooks, teachers and schoolyard buddies are on the same level as parents who feed their children junk food and unlimited TV. This generation of parents is hardly aware of the 40% illiteracy rate and those who do know about it don't connect it up with their local schools.

15 posted on 06/12/2004 10:15:38 AM PDT by Liberty Wins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
There is room for a lot of folks on the conservative side, just no socialists/communists. And no gun-confiscators. Can't and won't have that.

That said, Reagan was smart enough to take half a loaf and then come back later for the other half. Winning by increments is still winning.

16 posted on 06/12/2004 10:19:44 AM PDT by LibKill (Once more into the breach, dear friends!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Bump
To read later
17 posted on 06/12/2004 10:22:22 AM PDT by Fiddlstix (This Tagline for sale. (Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tkathy
"The republicans MUST be inclusive or they will cease to exist. "

Too much inclusion and the Republicans become meaningless, and it doesn't matter if they exist.

18 posted on 06/12/2004 12:49:49 PM PDT by slowhandluke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: LibKill

Exactly. Reagan was a "Big Picture" conservative: Supply side economist, anti-communist, pro-defense, rugged individualist values from head to toe. He believed in jobs as an ecnomic program, and the family as the truest governing unit.

Further, Reagan was brilliant in his understanding (that you point out) that winning incrementally is still winning - even if the increments come years later, as in when Clinton signed the "End of Welfare As We Know It" bill. THAT was pure Reagan,...nearly a decade after Reagan had left office.

Lastly, all true Reaganites follow his 11th Commandment: "Thou Shalt not speak ill of a fellow Republican." That is how you build majorities. That is how you win, even if incrementally.


19 posted on 06/12/2004 12:54:49 PM PDT by NCPAC ("Tax me a dollar a week for defense,...and leave me alone,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: NCPAC
He believed in jobs as an ecnomic program, and the family as the truest governing unit.

Very well said. Jobs are the best way to get into the American Dream. Family is basic.

I know some immigrants, LEGAL immigrants. They came in by the law, not under the border.

They work hard, they want to make something of themselves. They give good value on a day's pay.

They're getting a piece of the American Dream, by EARNING it.

I'd trade 10 of our layabout 'the world owes me a living' types for one more of them.

20 posted on 06/12/2004 1:18:29 PM PDT by LibKill (Once more into the breach, dear friends!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson